You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   The superweeds are coming!
The GOAT Blog

The superweeds are coming!

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Enter amount:

$
Danielle Venton | Mar 22, 2012 10:30 AM

The enemy grows among us, and it's spreading. Worse, its powers stand to increase.

Invading legions of superweeds have taken root in our fields. In California, growers battle at least 24 different types of herbicide resistant weeds, in nearly 2,000 sites across more than 200,000 acres. Idaho weed scientists report infestations across 240,000 acres. Around the U.S. the number of acres infested with weeds resistant to a single herbicide, glyphosate, totals 14 million. These plants, which once withered away with an application of glyphosate, known commercially as Roundup, now laugh in the chemical's face and sprout bravely on.

Such brazen pluckiness is becoming a major problem for farmers. Many growers routinely rely on Roundup to clear their fields for planting. Many others plant Monsanto's "Roundup Ready" crops, plants that have been genetically engineered to withstand the herbicide. This allows them to spray during the growing season, clearing out weeds growing amongst the crops. It is a convenient system, and since 1996, the year Roundup Ready soybeans became commercially available, glyphosate use has risen sharply. Today, the majority of crops grown in the U.S. are Roundup Ready.

But this trait of herbicide resistance, birthed through years of painstaking work into soybeans, corn, cotton, canola, alfalfa and sugar beet crops by Monsanto's scientists, weeds have achieved naturally. The constant application has unintentionally selected for and breed resistant weeds. It's elementary evolutionary biology: Apply a selection pressure and watch an organism evolve in response. And while this, allegedly, was a surprise to Monsanto scientists, the plants are only behaving exactly as we'd expect them to. (And as several scientists predicted they would. [PDF])

"What I'm really concerned about," said Don Morishita, a research scientist and extension adviser at Twin Falls Research and Extension Center in Idaho, "would be any situations where farmers are growing Roundup Ready crops in rotation, such as sugar beets, corn or alfalfa. This isn't the typical crop rotation around here, but it's something I'm really trying to caution farmers against."

There are no confirmed glyphosate resistant weeds in Idaho yet, Morishita says, (confirmation is a lengthy and involved process) but weed scientists suspect them in the western part of the state. "Farmers are reporting weeds that are difficult to kill with Roundup," he says. "It takes a couple of generations to reach full resistance. So this problem is literally knocking on the doors of Idaho."

To fix the problem, Monsanto and Dow are developing new crops with "stacked" herbicide resistance. Monsanto is pairing glyphosate and dicamba resistance, Dow glyphosate and 2,4-D. Using these crops, farmers would spray several weed killers at a time, instead of one, in the same way doctors treat resistant infections with multiple antibiotics.

Beyond more Roundup, this would mean far heavier applications of 2,4-D and dicamba, an older pesticide known commercially as Banvel, Oracle and Vanquish. Both chemicals are more volatile than glyphosate, and more prone to drift. While the US Environmental Protection Agency has classified both herbicides as being relatively benign to mammals, birds and fish, they're highly toxic to other plants. One farmer's crops could be damaged by another's application of herbicide.

Beasts of the Field

Nor, from a human perspective, are the chemicals worry-free. Dioxin, for example, is a contaminant produced in the 2,4-D manufacturing process. Even at low levels, dioxin is a potent neurotoxin. Out of these concerns, the Natural Resources Defense Council filed a lawsuit against the EPA in February for their failure to respond to a petition to ban the chemical.

And of course, stacked resistance is not a true solution, merely a delay of the problem. The application of multiple herbicides would promote multiple herbicide resistant weeds, in the same way that the abundance use of multiple antibiotics has lead to multiple antibiotic resistant bacteria. The medical field has reacted to this problem by escalating the number of antibiotics they use to treat infections. Seed/chemical companies are poised to do the same.

"You have a patents from DuPont where they envision having as many as seven or more herbicides [stacked in resistance], " says Bill Freese, a science policy analyst at the Center for Food Safety (see paragraph 33). "Monsanto has plans for triple resistant crops."

This, laments Freese, would lead to an ever-increasing dependence upon companies who supply seeds and the chemicals to use those seeds. "It shouldnt surprise us," he says. "It makes great business sense, it’s just a really bad idea from almost every other perspective."

There has been considerable outcry over this and related developments. Academics have protested stacked resistance in peer-reviewed literature and penned joint letters to the EPA (PDF), over pesticide-resistant insects evolved in fields of GM corn.

We're at a critical juncture, says Dave Mortensen, an agro-ecologist at Penn State. "Now is the time to decide whether we'll repeat past mistakes."

The stacked-resistant seeds have been developed and ready for market for a while now, but the Environmental Protection Agency and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the two agencies that review genetically modified crops, are just starting their first reviews.

There are other paths for farmers, Mortensen says. Focused crop rotations, cover crops, mulches and reducing the number of annual sprays would all be better options than embracing stacked resistance.

We could, of course, simply keep throwing our heavy artillery at weeds. But, given the ingenuity of plants, they're liable to incorporate the metal casing into their armor, to deflect all our military might. We know how plants behave. How we will behave remains to be seen.

Danielle Venton is an intern at High Country News.

Images: 1) "Scouting for Glyphosate Resistance," from the North Dakota State University and University of Minnesota Extension, via YouTube; 2) The beasts of the field come in all forms, image from Friends of the Prairie Learning Center at the Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge/Flickr.

Charlie Hohn
Charlie Hohn
Mar 22, 2012 11:43 AM
They've taken another potentially useful tool (round-up) and ruined it through greediness and laziness.
John Thurston
John Thurston
May 24, 2012 05:16 AM
What's amusing is that Charlie believes that round-up is actually useful. It's useful if you want to your food sprayed with the active ingredients in agent orange, but hardly useful in terms of ensuring sustainable nutritious agriculture. The answer has always been something the government doesn't want to contemplate because given the campaign contributions from Monsanto, Dow, etc the idea of organic food is an anathema to them since they cannot flock useless synthetic chemicals on the population. Have you guys ever considered using radio or microwaves the facilitate the growth of and the protection of various agricultural products? It's alot cheaper, safer and sustainable solution than any chemical.
Tim Baker
Tim Baker Subscriber
May 24, 2012 01:53 PM
John, I hate to burst your bubble but glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup wasn't a constituent of Agent Orange -- that was a 50:50 mixture of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. And even those herbicides weren't the real problem, it was that the rush to manufacture the 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T made for shoddy production and they allowed dioxin, a contaminant by-product, into the mix.

The resistance of weeds to herbicides is analogous to anti-biotic resistant bacteria because of the overuse of these useful compounds. We will all pay the price down the road for what looks like short-term gains.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. Trappers catch a lot more than wolves | Mountain lions, eagles, bobcats, geese and domesti...
  2. In the field with a Montana couple hunting wolves | Amid bitter controversy over allowing hunters and ...
  3. Seeking balance in Oregon's timber country | Can logging towns and old-growth forests both thri...
  4. (Still) getting the lead out | When will hunters stop poisoning condors with ammu...
  5. Rants from the hill: Trapping the bees | What to do when 50,000 honeybees hive up inside th...
  1. Don't mess with the Forest Service | How a determined and feisty Forest Service held of...
  2. Sacrificial Land: Will renewable energy devour the Mojave Desert? | An unlikely group of activists is championing a ne...
  3. California's carbon market may succeed where others have failed | The Golden State's new cap-and-trade program aims ...
  4. How right-wing emigrants conquered North Idaho | Conservative transplants largely from California h...
  5. The Forest Service battles placer mining with an obscure law | A little-known 1955 law gives the Forest Service a...
More from Mining & Agriculture
It's time to see exactly how the sausage gets made "Ag-gag" farm protection laws are the wrong way to go for the meat industry
A win for Monsanto on GMO crops A "Roundup" of news about genetically-modified crops and their apparently unstoppable rise.
How technology detected a huge mine landslide before it happened Employees at a Kennecott copper mine outside Salt Lake City knew an April 10 landslide was coming
All Mining & Agriculture

Most recent from the blogs

 
© 2013 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire | design by Ryan Foster

HCN Logo High Country News in your inbox!


Sign up now to receive our weekly email newsletter!

• The best weekly collection of Western environmental news

• An at-a-glance look at our latest news and analysis


This box was designed to only appear once. It uses a "cookie" (a small file stored on your computer) to remember that it has shown the box to you.

If you are seeing this box appear multiple times, then something is not allowing the cookie to be stored properly. Browsers can be set to not allow cookies, and some people choose to disallow cookies for security reasons. If your browser is setup this way, please consider adding "www.hcn.org" as an exception to your no-cookies rule. For information about how to do this, just search the Web for "browser cookie exceptions."

If you're sure this isn't the problem, then it could be related to how your browser has stored information from our site in previous visits. Browsers often "cache" images, text and other website content in order to make them appear faster if you ever go back. Sometimes the browser's cache can be corrupted or become outdated. The simplest fix for this is to try reloading the page. If that doesn't fix the problem, it may be necessary to clear your temporary items from your browser. Again, a web search will provide you with lots of options and instructions.

Either way, we're sorry to hear that this box is getting in the way of your enjoyment of the HCN website. If you continue to have trouble, please contact our Subscriber Services team.