The assumption underlying new county ordinances is that grazing permits are the “intangible” property of the permittee. Federal agencies, meanwhile, insist that grazing permits have always been a privilege, not a right.

To read this article, click the “View a PDF from the original” link below, or download entire issue: http://www.hcn.org/issues/24.3/download-entire-issue

Close window X

Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Our articles are available for republishing, but images are only available on a case-by-case basis. You can’t republish photographs or illustrations without written permission from High Country News and/or the photographer. Please reach out to syndication@hcn.org to request illustrations and photography for specific stories. Republishing guidelines

• Credit the author and High Country News - We prefer Author Name, High Country News at the byline.  At the top of the story, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by High Country News.”
• Check the image requirements - Images that are clearly marked CC or from federal agencies are in the creative commons and are available for republishing. Outside of this, you can’t republish photographs or illustrations without written permission from High Country News and/or the photographer. Please reach out to syndication@hcn.org to request more information.
• Don’t change anything significant - Articles must be republished in their entirety. Revisions for house style or references to time (“yesterday” to “today”) are allowed. If larger revisions are necessary, including significant trims or an editor’s note, contact us at syndication@hcn.org to get approval for the change ahead of republishing.
• Share on social media - When sharing on social tag High Country News in your post and note the story is from @highcountrynews
  • Twitter: @highcountrynews 
  • Instagram: @highcountrynews
  • TikTok: @highcountrynews
  • Facebook: @highcountrynews
  • LinkedIn: High Country News
• Stay in touch - Let us know you republished the story. Send a link to syndication@hcn.org once you’ve republished the story and let us know how it’s resonating with your readers.

Sagebrush Rebellion II: Some rural counties seek to influence federal land use

by Florence Williams, High Country News
February 24, 1992

<h1>Sagebrush Rebellion II: Some rural counties seek to influence federal land use</h1> <p class="byline">by Florence Williams, High Country News <br />February 24, 1992</p> <p>The assumption underlying new county ordinances is that grazing permits are the “intangible” property of the permittee. Federal agencies, meanwhile, insist that grazing permits have always been a privilege, not a right.</p> <p>To read this article, click the “View a PDF from the original” link below, or download entire issue: <a class="external-link" href="download-entire-issue">http://www.hcn.org/issues/24.3/download-entire-issue</a></p> <div class="wp-block-group hcn-print-edition-box"> <p>This article appeared in the <a href="/?p=188822">print edition of the magazine</a> with the headline <span class="hcn-magtitle">Sagebrush Rebellion II: Some rural counties seek to influence federal land use</span>.</p> </p></div> <p>This <a target="_blank" href="https://www.hcn.org/issues/24-3/sagebrush-rebellion-ii-some-rural-countie-seek-to-influence-federal-land-use/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://www.hcn.org">High Country News</a> and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.<img src="https://i0.wp.com/www.hcn.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cropped-HCN_Logo-Monogram_White_Sq-2.png?fit=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;"><img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="https://www.hcn.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=109029&amp;ga4=G-0NS3WVPPTN" style="width:1px;height:1px;"></p> Copy to Clipboard

1