Road rage on the Front Range
By Heather Hansen, Red Lodge Clearing House
Momentum is building for the
construction of a controversial, 10-mile
toll road through a wildlife refuge outside of Denver. Embroiled in the
road row are warring counties, a powerful mining company and one man obsessed
with asphalt.
Now that it seems the road may
become a reality,
the question that remains largely unanswered is, who is this parkway supposed
to benefit?
The Jefferson Parkway would run
roughly northeast from Colorado 93, north of Golden, to Colorado 128 near the
Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport. Its construction would supposedly improve
“regional connectivity” by bringing closer to completion the elusive “loop” around metro Denver.
What the Jefferson Parkway Public Highway Authority
(JPPHA) calls the “Beltway To Tomorrow” has been something of a pet project for
Jefferson County Commissioner and parkway board chairman, Kevin McCasky. For
years he has argued that, because Jefferson County (JeffCo) charges no general
sales tax, the road is key to his
county’s economic growth. The authority’s report rationalizing the
parkway’s construction links a number of
“approved and proposed
activity centers” that would be built alongside the road.
The latest proposed route is
only possible with the Highway Authority's purchase of a small portion of the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge.
The $2.8 million sale
would mean paving a 300-foot wide, 3.5-mile-long piece of
the refuge. Late last
week, JPPHA expressed its intent to buy the parcel of land.
No one has yet discussed the impact the four-lane,
high-speed roadway would have on resident wildlife
including deer, jackrabbits, painted turtles and rattlesnakes. This is a unique
area of wetlands, grasslands, shrublands and woodlands, that has just begun
to recover from the indignities of the arms race. Paving part of it before it
has a chance to fully recover is a disservice to all Coloradans.
While neither Boulder nor Golden truly want
the tollway, the new route is less controversial
because it allays some of the angst expressed by the two cities, making the
$204 million road more attractive to private bidders who would construct and
manage it.
The former route along a
northern section of Colorado Highway 93 was fought
bitterly by Boulder County, which was worried about development pressing up
against its border, and by Golden, which feared increased congestion. While the
new route still links the toll road to Highway 93, which runs through Golden,
officials there have been enticed by incentives JPPHA has been
dangling in front of them. JeffCo has suggested that millions of dollars
for improvements and rerouting of existing roads in Golden may come their way
if city officials green-light the new toll-road route.
What has hushed Boulder is a deal that’s harder to
understand. There is a one-mile-square wedge of land that borders the southwest
edge of Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge called “Section 16.” The surface
rights to the 640-acre plot are owned by the Colorado State Land Board.
The mineral rights to Section 16 have been leased since 1992 to LaFarge, a
manufacturer of construction products. LaFarge has an active permit to unearth
the estimated 15 million tons of underground gneiss,
a type of rock used in concrete and asphalt.
Boulder has agreed to drop its opposition to
the toll road if Section 16 is acquired and preserved as open space. The land
board, which uses the revenue from the mineral
rights’ lease for public education, may be convinced to sell Section 16 for
$10 million if it secures another piece
of land with mineral rights to lease. The land board will also only sell if it is convinced that the open space designation will
end the fighting between the counties. JeffCo would pitch in $5 million toward
the sale, and the other
half would have to come from the city and county of Boulder.
Of course, liberating Section
16 means that the mineral rights must also be acquired. If gneiss is worth $30
per ton, there’s potentially $450 million worth of mineable materials
underground there. Nevertheless, LaFarge has expressed
interest in being bought out for a rumored $6.6 million, a price which may
come down if the company foresees a potential PR windfall (i.e. ‘miner devoted
to preserving green space’).
That brings the price of
one-square-mile of land, adjacent to property that until recently contained
weapons-grade plutonium, to $16.6 million. Curiously, if the sale does not go
through, LaFarge has said it will start mining Section 16 in 2012 (after nearly
20 years of non-activity there).
No doubt Boulder appears stuck
in a Catch 22--it couldrefuse to take part in the Section 16 sale and risk both having a
huge quarry scar the landscape, and having JeffCo revert to its original
toll-way route which would straddle the border between the two counties,
possibly opening the door to undesirable development.
If the tollway as it’s now
being proposed goes forward, two stakeholders clearly stand to benefit: JeffCo
and LaFarge. Boulder will pay millions of dollars to buy a small piece of land
in a county other than its own, and will hope the mineral rights are subsequently
secured. Golden will withdraw opposition on the promise it will gets some
kickbacks someday.
A truce is great, in theory,
but this elaborate trade-off scheme is costly and risky, and it perpetuates sketchy
politics in order to get public works projects done in Colorado. McCasky is
either chasing a legacy, or is misguided by a Field of Dreams
build-it-and-they-will-come delusion. (We have to look no further than the
financially-beleaguered Northwest Parkway to learn a lesson about how most
people, especially in an economic downturn, are not willing to pay for a
shortcut.)
This tollway is a bad deal for
Colorado, and it’s time for Front Range cities to call the bluff.
Essays in the Range blog are not written by High Country News. The authors are
solely responsible for the content.
Heather Hansen is an environmental journalist working with the Red Lodge
Clearinghouse /Natural Resources Law Center at CU Boulder, to help
raise awareness of natural resource issues.
Image of Rocky Flats courtesy Fish and Wildlife Service.