States pay to re-open national parks and fuel anti-feds fire


Last Thursday, the complaints of business owners and restaurant workers in national park gateway towns around the West hit home when my boyfriend’s parents, who were about to embark on the Southwestern leg of their once-in-a-lifetime cross-country road trip, realized the shutdown had foiled their entire itinerary for the region. Instead of snapping pictures from the South Rim of the Grand Canyon or the shadow of Arches National Park’s Delicate Arch, they motored through, stopping at tribal parks and taking pictures from the car window.

They were two days too early. On Saturday, governors in Utah, Arizona and Colorado reached a deal with Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell to re-open select national parks with state and private funds. While the timing of the re-opening was frustrating for my boyfriend’s parents, it came not a moment too soon for tourism-dependent towns like Moab and Springdale, Utah, Estes Park, Colo., and Tusayan, Ariz., which were reeling at the prospect of a Columbus Day weekend – and possibly an entire October – without visitors. Indeed, as a report released last week by the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees makes clear, the closure of our national parks has already taken a huge economic toll on surrounding communities and on the National Park Service itself.

But the use of state funds to pay national park staff fuels the arguments of people like Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah), who believe states should have more control of federal land. “’If anything,’ the shutdown has shown that states and localities may be able to manage the properties better than the federal government,” he told E&E News.

Point Reyes National Seashore in California closed for the federal shutdown.

Though the state control issue has reared its head around the West for years, the momentum is strongest in Bishop’s home state, where in March 2012 Governor Gary Herbert signed a law requiring the feds to turn ownership of some 20 million acres over to Utah by December 31, 2014. Utahans have also recently tried to limit federal land agencies’ ability to enforce the law, declare state jurisdiction over “mismanaged” federal forests and limit federal management of endangered species – and keep the feds from having any input on these proposals. Now, state Rep. David Lifferth is drafting a bill that would allow Utah to operate its national parks if the feds are unable to do so.

"The federal government is dysfunctional,” Lifferth recently told The Salt Lake Tribune. “We need to be prepared for any eventuality … in the event the federal government can’t live up to their obligations, we need to be prepared at a moment’s notice.”

But as HCN’s Jodi Peterson wrote last year, the motives behind state control of federal lands aren’t so pure. “The rhetoric behind the measures is all about states' rights, but they would also boost corporate access to Western natural resources,” she wrote, noting that the fossil-fuel funded American Legislative Exchange Council supplied the language for Utah’s proposal.

Not every Western governor is gunning to run national parks. Although Colorado, Utah, South Dakota and Arizona forked over hundreds of thousands of dollars ($1.7 million in Utah) to re-open parks for the next 10 days or so, many other cash-strapped Western states have said they simply can’t afford it.

The governors of California, Washington and Nevada all cited budget constraints as the reason they would not be taking Secretary Jewell up on her offer to negotiate a deal to re-open their national parks. Others are refusing Jewell’s offer on principle. In Wyoming, a spokesman for Gov. Matt Mead told The Casper Star-Tribune, “Wyoming won’t bail out the federal government and spend state money to do federal work.”

The time of year also helps explain why some states, like Utah, jumped at the chance to re-open their parks, while others are hanging back. October is a huge tourism month for canyon country in sunny, hot Utah, generating $100 million in that month alone. But fall isn’t nearly as popular for tourists in much chillier Montana, where Kevin Gartland, executive director of the Whitefish Chamber of Commerce, told The Helena Independent Record “if this was July or August, we’d be up in arms."

Economic diversification in park gateway towns in recent decades also plays a role in how various localities are responding to the shutdown. In 1995, during the last shutdown, Carlsbad, N.M. raised money to keep Carlsbad Caverns National Park open. But that’s not happening this time around, Park Superintendent John Benjamin told the Current-Argus. That park is staying closed, at least for now. "I think one reason is that today, unlike back then, the economy is not as dependent on tourism because of the oil and gas boom. Tourism is still important to the community, but it appears not as crucial as it was in the mid-1990s."

Benjamin was set to retire the week of the shutdown, but has continued to act as superintendent because there wasn’t time to appoint someone else.

"Someone had to be at the helm to provide guidance and take on the responsibilities that still come with the shutdown," he told the Current-Argus. "I really don't know if I'm officially retired, so here I am."

Emily Guerin is a correspondent for High Country News. Follow her on Twitter @guerinemily.

Michael Kirkpatrick
Michael Kirkpatrick Subscriber
Oct 15, 2013 11:51 AM
I understand the predicament Congress has put local economies in, however states like Utah have (as the article says) been salivating over the prospect of taking back federal land for years, at least since James Watt and the Sagebrush Rebellion. The fact that the NPS (which probably had no choice, since the "occupy national parks" movement was getting increasingly violent) and hardliners in Congress (who are both hyperpartisan and incompetent) allowed states to get their foot in the door sets a dangerous precedent that's bound to add fuel to the states' rights fire for years to come. That NPS employees have been put in the middle of a no-win situation and the NPS itself has been cast as "the problem" makes the whole situation even more sad. Some of the Parks may be reopening but the repercussions are just getting started.
Deb Dedon
Deb Dedon Subscriber
Oct 15, 2013 02:23 PM
Perhaps it's time that Congress received a very large 'pink slip' from the American public. While it's likely another '80/20' problem (80% of the shutdown comes from 20% of Congress), their game of legislative chicken will ultimately harm the deep pockets funding them.
Rita Gibbs
Rita Gibbs
Oct 15, 2013 02:36 PM
I lived in Kanab, Utah for 5 years in the 1990's.
The locals are are violently anti-federal government, and yet the national parks and monuments in Utah bring in HUGE amounts of tourism dollars. I was there when Pres. Clinton created the Escalante Grand Staircase National Monument. The town leaders freaked out. They wore black armbands, bashed windows of local businesses owned by non-locals( aka non Mormons), and even shut down their own high school for a day or so! But not before some teachers whipped the local kids into an antigovernment frenzy. They acted as if the world was collapsing. It was nuts. If Utah ever gets its hands on federal lands, they will open it to mining, catte grazing, logging, hunting, ATVing and all manner of redneck environmental destruction. As I used to say when when I lived there , " it ain't America, it's Utard."
Rita Gibbs
Rita Gibbs
Oct 15, 2013 02:38 PM
But I do think its ridiculous that the Feds shut down the parks. They even shut down all the private concessionaires who operate USFS campgrounds but use no federal dollars or employees. Ridiculous.
Mark & Cheryl Brunson
Mark & Cheryl Brunson Subscriber
Oct 15, 2013 03:05 PM
One point that gets lost in all this bombast is that employees of National Park Service, BLM, Forest Service, etc. employees have specialized training and usually college degrees that help them do their jobs. Many Utah leaders seem to believe that anyone off the streets or the ranch can enforce park rules, manage recreation and wildlife, interpret unique resources, etc., on a day's notice. My department at Utah State University has been teaching wildland recreation management for 80 years. Many hundreds of Utah-born graduates have used that education to successful careers with federal agencies over those 80 years. It's extraordinarily frustrating to see how they're disparaged by "neighbors" who blame them for being unwitting victims of political shenanigans in Washington, DC.
Theresa Herrera
Theresa Herrera
Oct 18, 2013 10:05 AM
While I agree with Mr. Kirkpatrick's comments, I believe clarification is required. For public lands states (which includes all of the western states excluding Texas), the public lands cannot be 'taken back' - they were never owned by the state. See, for example, the 3rd paragraph of Section 20 of the Enabling Act for the Territory of New Mexico (Act of June 20, 1910 I quote: "That the people inhabiting said proposed State do agree and declare that they forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated and ungranted public lands lying within the boundaries thereof . . ."