You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Bad Omens for Arch Coal
The GOAT Blog

Bad Omens for Arch Coal

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Sierra Crane-Murdoch | Jan 18, 2011 12:50 PM

State officials in Montana and Washington are cracking down on projects that could expand coal production and trade in several Western states. Arch Coal Inc., a St. Louis-based company with a major stake in the expansion, doesn’t seem the least bit daunted--though maybe they should be.

On January 12, the company paid $25 million for a 38 percent share in a massive coal export terminal near the Port of Longview in Cowlitz County, Washington. The facility would ship about 5 million tons of coal to Asian markets each year. (The US currently exports eight times that amount.)


Longview, WA, the proposed site for a coal export terminal.  Courtesy of Flickr user, Sam Beebe.

But only two weeks before Arch made its investment, the state’s Department of Ecology challenged Cowlitz County’s decision to allow the facility. The environmental review, state officials said, didn’t consider the project’s whole carbon footprint--i.e., greenhouse gasses emitted once American coal lands in China’s steel factories.  It’s the second time a coal terminal proposal has met opposition in Washington, after a similar plan at the Port of Tacoma was blocked last year.

If that wasn’t a bad enough omen for Arch, on January 10, a Montana state judge ruled to allow environmental groups to sue the Montana Land Board after board chairman and Governor Brian Schweitzer leased more than a half-billion tons of state-owned coal to the company. The reason for the suit, again, was an alleged lapse in environmental review--the judge found that the lease would turn public property rights private, “before even considering possible environmental consequences.” Combined with private tracts, the Otter Creek lease in Montana’s Powder River Basin allowed Arch access to 1.2 billion tons of coal--more than it takes to power the U.S. for a year.

Perhaps Arch is overconfident, but if the company pulls through the litigation with its new deals intact, Montana’s untapped coal reserves could be bound for China.

Sierra Crane-Murdoch is an HCN intern.

News update
Jan 19, 2011 04:38 PM
Arch Coal Inc. crept even closer this week to shipping coal to Asian markets through a deal they struck with a BC port...check it out: http://seattletimes.nwsourc[…]xports.html?syndication=rss

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. The death of backpacking? | Younger people don’t seem interested in this out...
  2. Why I am a Tea Party member |
  3. The privatization of public campground management | All the info you need to decide whether you love o...
  4. Efficiency lessons from Germany |
  5. The Latest: Interior commits to restoring bison on select lands | The “odd ungulate out” gets a tentative win.
  1. The death of backpacking? | Younger people don’t seem interested in this out...
  2. A graceful gazelle becomes a pest | Inrroducing an African gazelle called the oryx for...
  3. What's killing the Yukon's salmon? | An ecological mystery in Alaska has scientists and...
  4. Plains sense | Ten years after Frank and Deborah Popper first pro...
  5. North Dakota wrestles with radioactive oilfield waste | Regulators look at raising the limit for radiation...
More from Energy
On booms and their remains A North Dakota photographer returns home to examine changes to the landscape.
Efficiency lessons from Germany
The Latest: Mining battle update at Utah’s Tavaputs Plateau State supreme court gives green light to tar sands permits.
All Energy
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone