Who wins and who loses with these 4 regulatory rollbacks?

Under a pandemic, Trump backslides pollution and wildlife protection standards.

 

In late March, as COVID-19 case numbers and fatalities continued to rise, President Donald Trump suggested ending social distancing, because, he said, “We cannot let the cure be worse than the problem itself.”

This was not just another off-the-cuff Trumpism. Rather, it was a tidy encapsulation of the administration’s ideological approach to regulations in general: The cure (any regulation that might diminish the corporate bottom line) is always worse than the problem (pollution, unsafe food, dangerous working conditions). Therefore, regulations should be discarded.

In one of the Trump administration's many regulatory rollbacks, the Mercury and Air Toxic Standards rule, or MATS, which required coal-fired power plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants, was made much more vulnerable.
Steve Allen/Alamy

Over the last three years, the Trump administration has employed this logic to eviscerate or eliminate dozens of environmental rules. Since the pandemic took hold, the pace of rollbacks has only increased, with the administration slashing rules on automobile efficiency and emissions, the disposal of toxic coal ash, the killing of migratory birds and more.

The starkest — though by no means only — display of this administration’s attitude toward cures and trade-offs was the April 16 dissolution of the legal basis for the Obama-era Mercury and Air Toxic Standards rule, or MATS, which required coal-fired power plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants.

MATS, which went into effect in 2012, has helped prevent up to 11,000 premature deaths, 4,700 heart attacks and 130,000 asthma attacks every year, according to an analysis by the Obama administration’s Environmental Protection Agency. According to the Trump administration, however, the public health benefits weren’t enough to justify the projected $9.6 billion-per-year price tag. Trump’s EPA concluded: “The costs of such regulation grossly outweigh the quantified hazardous air pollution benefits.”

As is often the case, when the administration worries about “cost,” it prioritizes and inflates any costs to industry, while ignoring or diminishing those that society would incur without the regulation. The Obama-era analysis of MATS, for example, found that its health benefits, if monetized, would amount to as much as $90 billion per year. And the automobile efficiency standards that the administration is discarding would have saved consumers money on gasoline in the long run.

The architects of the rollbacks, from Interior Secretary David Bernhardt to EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler, have spent most of their careers serving industry, anti-regulation ideologues or both. A few examples of the rollbacks pushed under the shadow of the coronavirus reveal that the winners are invariably corporate interests or ideologues, while the losers, most often, are the rest of us.


Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals From Electric Utilities (2015)

THE RULE:
Coal combustion waste — one of the world’s largest industrial waste streams — contains harmful materials that get into the air, groundwater, lakes and rivers. The 2015 rule gives the EPA authority to regulate coal ash and other solid waste as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. When it was first created, it was criticized for being too weak.

THE ROLLBACK:
Opens a loophole in the rule that allows power producers to dispose of waste in unlined impoundments. (March 3, 2020)

WHO WINS?
• Electric utilities and power producers that can cut costs by not lining disposal cells.
• Anti-regulatory ideologues.

WHO LOSES?
• Wildlife and people who live near and drink water affected by the impoundments. A 2016 U.S. Civil Rights Commission report found that, more often than not, low-income people of color are most likely to be harmed. Coal ash impoundments at the Four Corners Power Plant in northwestern New Mexico, for example, contaminated groundwater in an area where nearly all of the surrounding population is Indigenous and at least one-third live below the poverty line.

 

Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards (2012)

THE RULE:
The transportation sector is the nation’s largest source of greenhouse gas emissions. The Obama-era standards required automobile manufacturers to increase fuel economy across the new car fleet by 5% each year, thereby also reducing carbon dioxide and other tailpipe emissions by an estimated 2 billion metric tons over the lives of those vehicles.

THE ROLLBACK:
In order to “Make Cars Great Again,” the Trump administration is revamping the rules so that, among other things, they will require only a 1.5% annual increase in fuel economy.

WHO WINS?
• The petroleum industry, which, under the Obama standards, would have seen oil consumption drop by about 2 million barrels per day.
• The automobile industry, which will be able to cut costs, and car buyers, who will save around $1,000 per new car thanks to the rollback — assuming the automakers pass on their savings.

WHO LOSES?
• Any living thing that depends on a stable climate.
• The 444 to 1,000 people who will die prematurely each year because of increased pollution.
• Drivers, who will spend at least $1,000 more on gasoline over the life of a less-efficient vehicle.

 

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918)

THE RULE:
By the early 1900s, at least a half-dozen bird species, from the Labrador duck to the passenger pigeon, were extinct due to unregulated hunting. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act endeavors to avoid future extinctions by prohibiting the capture or killing of protected birds. By imposing fines as high as $15,000 per killed bird, the MBTA incentivizes industry to minimize “incidental” kills.

THE ROLLBACK:
In January, the Trump administration finalized a 2017 decision to ignore the prohibition on incidental takes. Now, if a protected bird is killed by a wind turbine blade, industrial pesticide, a commercial fishing longline, a toxic oil-waste pit or mine-tailings pond, there are no legal consequences.

WHO WINS?
• 
The oil industry, which no longer need worry about the million or so birds it kills annually in pits and ponds. (The Independent Petroleum Association of America specifically requested the rollback just before the Interior Department crafted its legal opinion.)
• Companies like Montana Resources and Atlantic Richfield, the owners of the Berkeley Pit, which got a taste of winning when the Trump administration refused to fine them for the 3,000 snow geese that died in the mine’s toxic waters.

WHO LOSES?
• The millions of birds killed each year by industrial infrastructure.
• The wetland conservation projects that are funded by penalty fines, which can be substantial: BP was fined $100 million under the MBTA for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill.
• Bird lovers (and everyone else).

 

Mercury Air Toxics Standard (2012)

THE RULE:
Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that accumulates in food chains. It can cause lifelong neurological problems for children exposed in the womb, while exposure during adulthood can compromise the immune system and increase the risk of heart attacks and other cardiovascular problems. The 2012 rule requires the operators of coal-fired power plants — the leading source of mercury in the environment — to use the best available technology to reduce emissions of mercury and associated air pollutants. Compliance would also cut emissions of harmful co-pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide and fine particulate matter.

THE ROLLBACK:
Trump’s EPA is not directly rolling back the mercury rule. Rather, it’s undermining its legal foundation by determining that it is not “appropriate and necessary” to regulate hazardous air pollutants from power plants under the Clean Air Act. That makes the mercury rule vulnerable to legal challenges. The administration is also altering how costs and benefits are calculated, inflating the costs for compliance while downplaying the benefits.

WHO WINS?
• 
The coal industry could reap the most from the rollback, which was included in a deregulatory “action plan” that coal baron Robert E. Murray sent to Trump early in his term. However, the industry benefits only if utilities burn more coal, which is currently unlikely, given that coal’s woes are economic, not regulatory.
• The utility industry, which could probably cut costs by shutting off pollution-control equipment. Many utilities have already spent the money installing equipment, however.

WHO LOSES?
• 
Anyone breathing the hazardous air, especially if they live near coal-fired power plants.
• People who eat fish. Mercury emitted into the air often ends up in the water, where it becomes highly toxic methylmercury and works its way through the aquatic food web.

Jonathan Thompson is a contributing editor at High Country News. He is the author of River of Lost Souls: The Science, Politics and Greed Behind the Gold King Mine Disaster. Email him at [email protected] or submit a letter to the editor. 

High Country News Classifieds
  • GRAND CANYON DIRECTOR
    The Grand Canyon director, with the Grand Canyon manager, conservation director, and other staff, envisions, prioritizes, and implements strategies for the Grand Canyon Trust's work...
  • ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
    Great Old Broads for Wilderness seeks a part-time Administrative Assistant to support the organization's general operations. This includes phone and email communications, office correspondence and...
  • HISTORIC LODGE AND RESTAURANT - FULLY EQUIPPED
    Built in 1901, The Crazy Mountain Inn has 11 guest rooms in a town-center building on 7 city lots (.58 acres). The inn and restaurant...
  • ONE WILL: THREE WIVES
    by Edith Tarbescu. "One Will: Three Wives" is packed with a large array of interesting suspects, all of whom could be a murderer ... a...
  • PROGRAM DIRECTOR, SALAZAR CENTER FOR NORTH AMERICAN CONSERVATION
    The Program Director will oversee the programmatic initiatives of The Salazar Center, working closely with the Center's Director and staff to engage the world's leading...
  • WILDEARTH GUARDIANS - WILD PLACES PROGRAM DIRECTOR
    Salary Range: $70,000-$80,000. Location: Denver, CO, Portland, OR, Seattle, WA, Missoula, MT or potentially elsewhere for the right person. Application Review: on a rolling basis....
  • RIVER EDUCATOR/GUIDE + TRIP LEADER
    Position Description: Full-time seasonal positions (mid-March through October) Organizational Background: Colorado Canyons Association (CCA) is a 10 year old nonprofit organization fostering community stewardship of...
  • BOOKKEEPER/ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
    Position Description: Part-time, year-round bookkeeping and administration position (12 - 16 hours/week) $16 - $18/hour DOE Organizational Background: Colorado Canyons Association (CCA) is a 10...
  • LAND STEWARD
    San Isabel Land Protection Trust seeks a full-time Land Steward to manage and oversee its conservation easement monitoring and stewardship program for 42,437 acres in...
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
    Ventana Wilderness Alliance is seeking an experienced forward-facing public land conservation leader to serve as its Executive Director. The mission of the Ventana Wilderness Alliance...
  • COMMUNICATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
    The Quivira Coalition (www.quiviracoaltion.org) is a Santa Fe-based nonprofit that builds resilience on arid working lands. We foster ecological, economic, and social health through education,...
  • GRANT WRITER
    "We all love this place we call Montana. We believe that land and water and air are not ours to despoil, but ours to steward...
  • DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
    The Development Director is responsible for organizing and launching a coherent set of development activities to build support for the Natural History Institute's programs and...
  • WILDLIFE PROJECT COORDINATOR
    Founded in 1936, the National Wildlife Federation (NWF or Federation) is America's largest and most trusted grassroots conservation organization with 53 state/territorial affiliates and more...
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
    The Cinnabar Foundation helps protect and conserve water, wildlife and wild lands in Montana and the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem by supporting organizations and people who...
  • TRUSTEE AND PHILANTHROPY RELATIONS MANGER,
    Come experience Work You Can Believe In! The Nature Conservancy in Alaska is seeking a Trustee and Philanthropy Relations Manager. This position is critical to...
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AT FRIENDS OF CEDAR MESA
    -The Land, History, and People of the Bears Ears Region- The Bears Ears and Cedar Mesa region is one of the most beautiful, complex, diverse,...
  • CONSERVATION SPECIALIST
    Position will remain open until January 31, 2021 Join Our Team! The New Mexico Land Conservancy (NMLC) is a non-profit land trust organization dedicated to...
  • OLIVERBRANCH CONSULTING
    Non-Profit Management Professional specializing in Transitional Leadership, Strategic Collaborations, Communications and Grant Management/Writing.
  • GREAT VIEWS, SMALL FOOTPRINT
    Close to town but with a secluded feel, this eco-friendly home includes solar panels, a graywater reuse system, tankless hot water, solar tubes, and rainwater...