Western court scraps intervention restrictions for enviro lawsuits

  • Off-roaders, conservationists and other resource users now have a clearer path for joining environmental lawsuits.

    Istock
 

In mid-January, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals published a 13-page opinion with a simple message: mea culpa. A panel of judges tossed the little-known but long-standing "federal defendant rule," which had limited or prevented private groups, local and state governments from joining environmental lawsuits.

The 9th Circuit, which oversees hundreds of millions of acres of public land in the West, routinely handles high-stakes legal wrangling over issues such as the Roadless Area Conservation Rule, salmon protections and spotted owl habitat. But as courtroom dramas go, this latest one was anticlimactic: For the most part, everyone agreed.

The federal defendant rule, followed only in the 9th Circuit, denied non-federal parties the right to intervene on the government's behalf in lawsuits filed against federal agencies under the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires agencies to size up the environmental impacts of proposed actions and allow public comment. Last December, Paul Turcke, a lawyer representing a coalition of motorized recreation groups, asked an 11-judge panel convened in Pasadena, Calif., to kill the rule, which had been invoked to prevent his clients from intervening in a lawsuit over motorized travel in Idaho's Sawtooth National Forest. Thirty-seven "friends of the court," including oil and gas groups, local and state officials, water districts, tribes, farming and ranching interests and ORV groups, chimed in to support Turcke's appeal. No one defended the rule -- not even the environmental groups who filed the suit.

The rule has always been a double-edged sword for environmentalists, says Erik Schlenker-Goodrich, a Western Environmental Law Center lawyer. "We used it to try to keep motorized groups out of our litigation," he admits, but the rule was also employed to keep environmentalists on the sidelines.

Just 31 days after the December hearing, the panel tossed the rule, effectively loosening the standard for intervention in environmental lawsuits in seven states in our region. It was an important move, but not world-changing. It will give groups whose interests are affected by active litigation a better chance to participate in lawsuits that can have far-reaching effects on environmental policy. But it's unlikely to swamp the courts, Turcke explains: "It's not black and white -- (it's not) 'you're in or you're out.' " Groups still have to prove they deserve to be involved, by participating in the grueling administrative processes that precede litigation, for instance. "(And) even if you can get into a case, you still have to figure out a way to meaningfully participate in it," Turcke adds.

The now-defunct rule was born in the late 1980s, when the Portland Audubon Society sued the Bureau of Land Management for allowing old-growth logging in spotted owl habitat in Oregon. The district court let a timber association intervene on some of the claims in the case -- those charging violations of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, for example. But the court said the timber group couldn't intervene on the case's NEPA claim, because only the federal government was bound by NEPA and the group's "purely economic interest" wasn't protected by the act. That reasoning became the foundation for the federal defendant rule, which was affirmed by the appellate court in 1989.

Theoretically, the rule applied only to NEPA cases. But its logic could be harnessed to keep interest groups out of almost any environmental lawsuit. In a 2006 Endangered Species Act case, for example, environmental groups used the rule to oppose intervention by grazing interests in a suit alleging that two federal agencies didn't adequately consider grazing's impact on threatened steelhead and bull trout in Oregon.

The judge agreed that the grazing groups had no right to intervene as full parties, but he allowed them limited participation in one phase of the lawsuit.

There are two paths outside parties can use to intervene: They can prove they have a right to do so by passing a four-part test; or, they can simply request the judge's permission. The federal defendant rule applied only to the first path, giving judges some leeway. But even when intervention was allowed, it often came with restrictions -- if a group wasn't granted full-party status in a lawsuit, it wouldn't have the privilege to file its own motions or present evidence, for instance. And some districts were more permissive than others. Montana, Turcke says, was generally liberal about allowing intervention, while courts in the Northwest more frequently limited or denied it. Now these inconsistencies should become fewer since judges will be able to apply the more objective four-part test to intervention petitions.

It's difficult to say what the results might be, or whether intervention will become more common. But intervenors have played decisive roles in many lawsuits. Motorized recreation advocates were instrumental in driving a lawsuit filed by the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance against the BLM all the way to the Supreme Court. The High Court's decision placed significant restrictions on the public's ability to force federal agencies to follow their own land-management plans. Similarly, when the feds didn't appeal an Idaho court's 2001 decision to halt implementation of the Roadless Rule, environmental intervenors appealed instead. The injunction was lifted as a result, and the Roadless Rule is now the law of the land in most Western states.

"Most courts are pretty liberal about (intervention) because it's appropriate to have everybody impacted at the table," says Karin Sheldon, executive director of Western Resource Advocates, a conservation group that handles many environmental lawsuits. "(The federal defendant rule) was an anomaly and it's been corrected. I think it's the right move."

High Country News Classifieds
  • DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
    Greater Yellowstone Coalition seeks a development professional to coordinate the organization's individual giving program. The position description is available at http://greateryellowstone.org/careers Please email a letter...
  • IDAHO STATE DIRECTOR
    The Wilderness Society is seeking a full time Idaho State Director who will preferably be based in Boise, Idaho. At least 8-10 years of experience...
  • COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER AND BEARS EARS EDUCATION CENTER MANAGER
    Conservation nonprofit Friends of Cedar Mesa in Bluff, Utah is hiring for two positions. We seek a Communications Manager to execute inspiring and impactful communications...
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
    Wilderness Volunteers Wilderness Volunteers (WV), a 24-year leader in preserving our nation's wildlands, is seeking a motivated person with deep outdoor interests to guide our...
  • HECHO POLICY AND ADVOCACY MANAGER
    Hispanics Enjoying Camping, Hunting, and the Outdoors (HECHO) was created in 2013 to help fulfill our duty to conserve and protect our public lands for...
  • FISHERIES BIOLOGIST
    Under the direct supervision of the Director of Shoshone-Paiute Tribe's Fish, Wildlife & Parks, in coordination with the Tribal Programs Administrator and the Tribal Chairman,...
  • REGIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NORTHERN ROCKIES, PRAIRIES & PACIFIC REGION
    Founded in 1936, the National Wildlife Federation has grown into America's largest and most trusted grassroots conservation organization with 53 state/territorial affiliates and more than...
  • STEWARDSHIP MANAGER
    STEWARDSHIP MANAGER Job Vacancy and Description Posted June 2, 2021: Open until filled The New Mexico Land Conservancy (NMLC) is a non-profit, regional land trust...
  • KSJD - MORNING EDITION HOST/REPORTER
    KSJD is seeking a host/reporter. Please see for www.ksjd.org for more information. EEO compliant.
  • ON THE EDGE OF CEDAR MESA/BEARS EARS
    Quiet, comfy house for rent in Bluff, Utah. Walk to San Juan River. Bike or hike to many nearby ruins and rock art sites. Beautiful...
  • CARPENTER AND LABORER WANTED.
    Come to Ketchikan and check out the Rain forest on the coast, Hike the shorelines, hug the big trees, watch deer in the muskeg meadows,...
  • PROJECT MANAGER
    Title: Project Manager Reports To: Program Director Salary Range: Negotiable; starting at $60,000 Location: Bend, OR The Deschutes River Conservancy seeks a Project Manager to...
  • PROGRAM DIRECTOR
    The Deschutes River Conservancy seeks a Program Director to join our dynamic team in restoring streamflow and improving water quality in the Deschutes Basin. WHO...
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - TWISPWORKS
    Established healthy nonprofit in the Methow Valley of Washington state, TwispWorks is hiring the next Executive Director. Terrific opportunity to strive for our mission to...
  • BOARD DIRECTOR
    Help us achieve our mission of promoting excellence in the professional practice of wilderness stewardship, science and education to ensure the life-sustaining benefits of wilderness....
  • TEMPORARY FULL-TIME RANCH OPERATIONS ASSISTANT
    Twin Willows Ranch in Ocate, NM is seeking to immediately fill a Temporary Full-Time employment position as Ranch Operations Assistant for Facilities, Equipment, Land, and...
  • RANCH OPERATIONS ASSISTANT
    Twin Willows Ranch in Ocate, NM is seeking an individual to fill the Regular Full-Time position of Resident Operations Assistant for Technology, Hospitality, Gardening, and...
  • CONSERVATION PROJECT MANAGER
    Conservation Project Manager Position Description Join Skagit Land Trust (the Trust), a not-for-profit conservation organization based in Mount Vernon, Washington, and help protect land for...
  • NOVA SCOTIA OCEAN FRONT
    Camp or Build on 2+ acres in Guysborough. FSBO. $36,000 US firm. Laurie's phone: 585-226-2993 EST.
  • TECHNICAL ADVISOR TO THE GOOD NEIGHBOR AGREEMENT
    Northern Plains Resource Council seeks an independent contractor to implement the Good Neighbor Agreement (GNA) between local communities and the Sibanye-Stillwater Mining Company in Montana....