Belief versus science

  HCN’s recent cover story on the fate of the Anasazi was both mystical and informative — mystical because it was peppered with references to the imagination (HCN, 10/3/05: Out of the Four Corners). The article attributed archaeologist Susan Ryan with gaining a knowledge that "was too intimate and instinctual" to fit within the confines of her profession.

Just a few pages further, biologist Pepper Trail’s essay talked about how the evolution versus intelligent design debate threatens to convert our society from a reality-based one into a belief-based one. Trail’s thesis seems to be that our society cannot afford to have our understanding of reality governed by what we choose to believe; it must be informed by factual evidence and testable hypotheses — in short, by science.

Why is it permissible for Susan Ryan to hold and propagate her beliefs, but not permissible for intelligent design advocates to do the same?

Ken Frederick
Boise, Idaho

High Country News Classifieds