Grazing: the shape of the future

  • I always had a dream of buying a little ranch out West - and selling it off piece by piece.

    Greg Siple
 

Most combatants in the public-lands grazing battle are still in their bunkers, happily sending shells into opposing camps. Nevertheless, there hangs over this familiar and comfortable scene a small but dark cloud: the willingness among some former enemies to talk to each other.

The possibility of negotiations is as unsettling in the West as it is in Northern Ireland and the Middle East. Those who cling to the never-surrender-and-never-negotiate ways feel betrayed by conversation and negotiation. Environmentalists are the most publicly shaken, as was apparent in a full page Denver Post ad that 54 groups signed repudiating the Colorado process. But ranchers, who generally maintain tighter discipline in public, are also very nervous.

The two groups are angry internally, and everyone is angry at Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt. It is not surprising that ranchers are suspicious of Babbitt. But it is a tiny bit ungrateful of environmentalists to call Babbitt names over this new process. After all, he left half of his political blood on the floor of the U.S. Senate trying to carry the environmental movement's traditional approach to rangeland reform.

Because Babbitt, unlike predecessor James Watt, is not a suicide pilot, he is now trying to achieve reform in a different way. For this effort, he deserves the West's version of the Nobel Peace Prize. At the least, given the failure of traditional sue-and-legislate approaches to change, he deserves the chance to give this new approach a try.

But on-the-ground consensus-building, we are told, is hopeless. Environmental critics say that if private citizens negotiate with ranchers, we will lose. Only strong regulations, it is argued, administered centrally and with an iron fist, can save the land and its wildlife. Local people and local processes, it is said, will inevitably betray the land.

The reality is different. No land can be controlled from afar, against the will of local people. Distant environmentalists can encourage change and, failing that, they can create conflict and gridlock, making life expensive and miserable for locals. But successful, on-the-ground management will require the wholehearted cooperation of local people.

Thanks to the efforts of the national environmental groups, backed by good work locally, we have reached a stage in this struggle where there is no alternative to sitting down with the ranchers. Initially the ranchers will have the negotiating edge. But over the longer term, citizen reformers will win. Some victories will come because progressive ranchers will adopt their critics' values, but implement those values in their individual ways. Victories over ranchers determined to stick to the old ways will come harder, but those too will come.

The majority of environmentalists and ranchers oppose the Colorado approach and may succeed in killing it. But on-the-ground cooperation among environmentalists and ranchers was growing even before Babbitt and Colorado Governor Roy Romer thrust the process onto center stage. Such efforts will proceed here and there, in growing numbers, regardless of what happens now in Washington, D.C.

The evolution of this new approach to grazing on public lands will take years, but its probable shape can already be seen. First, local land-use practices will be hammered out locally. If environmentalists can't field a team in, let's say, Catron County, N.M., then extractors will dominate that county, subject to appeals and lawsuits and other tactics that distant environmentalists can use. But the Catron Counties of the West will grow fewer and fewer. As time goes on, and as the West continues to change, all small communities will have those who speak, in many different ways, for wildlife and healthy ecosystems.

The local negotiations will take place within a larger context. The context will include the recognition that - especially in the Southwest - some lands are absolutely unsuitable for grazing.

Where the land can be grazed in a healthy, sustainable way, it will be recognized that it is in the public interest to grant ranchers a long-term claim on continued use of the public lands. But in exchange for that recognition, ranchers must bring their private land into the negotiations. Right now ranchers claim that they protect the West from residential and resort development. The claim is false, as we can see by looking at all the subdividing and resort development that has taken place on former ranch land.

There is no reason why taxpayers in general or Westerners in particular should give ranchers a privileged position on the public lands unless the ranchers give the public guarantees about development of their private lands. A start in this direction was made at the Colorado negotiations, where a rancher offered to guarantee non-development of his private lands for the tenure of his grazing permit. In other words, if he got a 15-year grazing permit, he would grant a 15-year non-development easement.

Ranchers argue that there is an indissoluble link between their private lands and the public lands their animals graze. They believe they have a special claim on the public lands while, we, the public, are supposed to keep our hands strictly off their private lands. In reality, the links between the private, base property and the public lands must be made to run in both directions.

The decision to hold the Colorado negotiations was only the first of many tough, divisive choices that lie ahead. Environmentalists, for example, will have to decide whether to abandon their goal of evicting cattle from the public land. They will have to come to terms with the fact that the ranching community is a tight-knit, effective group that someday will prove to be an invaluable ally.

And ranchers will have to decide whether they are truly loyal to the land and to multiple generations on the land, or whether their real loyalty is to "private property rights," which is code for eventually selling out to subdividers for top dollar.

Ed Marston is publisher of High Country News.

High Country News Classifieds
  • GRAND CANYON DIRECTOR
    The Grand Canyon director, with the Grand Canyon manager, conservation director, and other staff, envisions, prioritizes, and implements strategies for the Grand Canyon Trust's work...
  • ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
    Great Old Broads for Wilderness seeks a part-time Administrative Assistant to support the organization's general operations. This includes phone and email communications, office correspondence and...
  • HISTORIC LODGE AND RESTAURANT - FULLY EQUIPPED
    Built in 1901, The Crazy Mountain Inn has 11 guest rooms in a town-center building on 7 city lots (.58 acres). The inn and restaurant...
  • ONE WILL: THREE WIVES
    by Edith Tarbescu. "One Will: Three Wives" is packed with a large array of interesting suspects, all of whom could be a murderer ... a...
  • PROGRAM DIRECTOR, SALAZAR CENTER FOR NORTH AMERICAN CONSERVATION
    The Program Director will oversee the programmatic initiatives of The Salazar Center, working closely with the Center's Director and staff to engage the world's leading...
  • WILDEARTH GUARDIANS - WILD PLACES PROGRAM DIRECTOR
    Salary Range: $70,000-$80,000. Location: Denver, CO, Portland, OR, Seattle, WA, Missoula, MT or potentially elsewhere for the right person. Application Review: on a rolling basis....
  • RIVER EDUCATOR/GUIDE + TRIP LEADER
    Position Description: Full-time seasonal positions (mid-March through October) Organizational Background: Colorado Canyons Association (CCA) is a 10 year old nonprofit organization fostering community stewardship of...
  • BOOKKEEPER/ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
    Position Description: Part-time, year-round bookkeeping and administration position (12 - 16 hours/week) $16 - $18/hour DOE Organizational Background: Colorado Canyons Association (CCA) is a 10...
  • LAND STEWARD
    San Isabel Land Protection Trust seeks a full-time Land Steward to manage and oversee its conservation easement monitoring and stewardship program for 42,437 acres in...
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
    Ventana Wilderness Alliance is seeking an experienced forward-facing public land conservation leader to serve as its Executive Director. The mission of the Ventana Wilderness Alliance...
  • COMMUNICATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
    The Quivira Coalition (www.quiviracoaltion.org) is a Santa Fe-based nonprofit that builds resilience on arid working lands. We foster ecological, economic, and social health through education,...
  • GRANT WRITER
    "We all love this place we call Montana. We believe that land and water and air are not ours to despoil, but ours to steward...
  • DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
    The Development Director is responsible for organizing and launching a coherent set of development activities to build support for the Natural History Institute's programs and...
  • WILDLIFE PROJECT COORDINATOR
    Founded in 1936, the National Wildlife Federation (NWF or Federation) is America's largest and most trusted grassroots conservation organization with 53 state/territorial affiliates and more...
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
    The Cinnabar Foundation helps protect and conserve water, wildlife and wild lands in Montana and the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem by supporting organizations and people who...
  • TRUSTEE AND PHILANTHROPY RELATIONS MANGER,
    Come experience Work You Can Believe In! The Nature Conservancy in Alaska is seeking a Trustee and Philanthropy Relations Manager. This position is critical to...
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AT FRIENDS OF CEDAR MESA
    -The Land, History, and People of the Bears Ears Region- The Bears Ears and Cedar Mesa region is one of the most beautiful, complex, diverse,...
  • CONSERVATION SPECIALIST
    Position will remain open until January 31, 2021 Join Our Team! The New Mexico Land Conservancy (NMLC) is a non-profit land trust organization dedicated to...
  • OLIVERBRANCH CONSULTING
    Non-Profit Management Professional specializing in Transitional Leadership, Strategic Collaborations, Communications and Grant Management/Writing.
  • GREAT VIEWS, SMALL FOOTPRINT
    Close to town but with a secluded feel, this eco-friendly home includes solar panels, a graywater reuse system, tankless hot water, solar tubes, and rainwater...