The lawsuit charges that the Forest Service violated federal law by issuing grazing permits without considering whether the Prescott was suitable for livestock. The 1976 National Forest Management Act requires the agency to determine if an activity is economically and environmentally appropriate when developing forest plans.
The Forest Service has acknowledged that grazing has extensively damaged the Prescott. In 1987, planners found all but 1 percent of the forest's streamside areas in poor or very poor condition. Still, they opted to continue grazing in most areas.
Regional foresters are now working on a "how-to" guide for determining suitability, and Charlie Richmond, head of range management for the Rocky Mountain Region, expects it will lead to restricted grazing in some areas. He says, "There are a lot of things we can do better in terms of suitability."
* Greg Hanscom
- Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake’s criticism of Trump wins him national prominence
- BLM moves away from landmark Northwest Forest Plan
- How Utah coal interests helped push a secret plan to export coal from California
- Emotions run high over monument designation in Utah
- Let’s be clear: TSA’s new tactics are bribery
- Kent Matowitz on Sometimes, the West must be protected from itself
- Katherine Fiveash on Ranch Diaries: How to have a clear head and rested heart
- Kent Matowitz on Let’s be clear: TSA’s new tactics are bribery
- Blair French on How Shelton Johnson became the Buffalo Soldiers’ champion
- Ruby Ram on Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake’s criticism of Trump wins him national prominence