You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Deregulation talk shakes up Arizona energy scene
The GOAT Blog

Deregulation talk shakes up Arizona energy scene

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Jonathan Thompson | Aug 21, 2013 05:20 PM

The Arizona energy fight that everyone's been yapping about lately is the effort by the state's largest investor-owned utility, Arizona Public Service, to tweak state regulations regarding how the utility compensates homeowners for energy they produce from rooftop solar panels. That show – over the decidedly un-sexy-sounding issue of net metering – has a wacky cast, from Barry Goldwater Jr. to solar industry executives to Tea Party members, often fighting for sides that would surprise.

TransmissionTowerPaloVerde
Transmission towers near the Palo Verde hub in Arizona. Photo: Jonathan Thompson.

Yet a potentially far more important issue, though less titillating and maybe even harder to untangle, is throwing the Arizona energy world into a bit of a tiff lately: deregulation. This spring, the Arizona Corporation Commission, the state's utility regulator and a body that's been wielding a lot of power lately, asked the state's utilities to give their thoughts on opening up the state's electricity market to competition as has been done in Pennsylvania and Texas.

It was just a question, and a rather vague one at that, but folks are already lining up for a fight. APS called it, "the most significant action by the ACC in more than a decade." The utility, which would potentially lose its captive customer base under deregulation, is against the idea, as is Tucson Electric Power and the Salt River Project, the state's two other big electric utilities. Carrying the opposition's water is the Arizona Power Consumers Coalition, which counts the Arizona Association of Realtors, the Sedona Tea Party, the Arizona Charter Schools Association and the Arizona Diamondbacks (seriously) as members. They essentially argue that the current system provides stability and low rates, so don't mess with it.

Leading the charge in favor of deregulation for obvious free market-type reasons are groups like the Arizona state chapter of the ultra-right, Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity, and the Goldwater Institute. Competition, they say, would bring prices down and provide more choice, just as breaking up telecommunications monopolies has done. They're joined by a crew of big businesses (ie large electricity gulpers that could get a good deal from a competitive market) – from mining giant Freeport McMoran to Intel to WalMart – under the umbrella of the Arizonans for Electric Choice and Competition.

Deregulation is certainly not an either/or proposition. It's up to the ACC to determine what form it might take. But it could be good for renewable energy. Customers could, in theory, choose power suppliers that would supply them with 100 percent renewables; currently, they're basically trapped into buying a very coal-heavy energy mix from APS, SRP or TEP. And, in all likelihood, deregulation would include the creation of an independent system operator to operate the Arizona grid, much in the same way it's done in California. That can help with so-called geographic smoothing of wind and solar, which suffer from intermittency, thereby allowing more renewables into the grid.

Arizona actually deregulated once already, or tried to, back in the late 1990s and early aughts, when the nation as a whole was moving in that direction. California was one of the leaders, and therefore one of the first to get burned by deregulation. Bad operators gamed the system. Enron shipped power out of state, then back in, to get by state price caps. And so on. The experiment crashed in California, and other states got cold feet, or ran into their own complications, and for the most part halted deregulation.

Under that old Arizona deregulation plan, utilities would have been forced to divest from their power plants and other assets (though there would be ways for them to recapture stranded costs). That possibility has already shaken up the Arizona energy scene, with ripples going into New Mexico and California. After the ACC brought up deregulation, APS postponed indefinitely a plan to buy two Southern California Edison-owned units of the Four Corners Power Plant in northwestern New Mexico and shut down the plant's three other units. And that has stopped the Navajo Nation from going ahead with a possible purchase of the Navajo Mine, which supplies Four Corners, from BHP Billiton.

That deal, the fate of the Four Corners Power Plant, and the Arizona energy scene in general all hang on the ACC deregulation decision, which could be handed down as early as this fall. We'll keep you informed.

Jonathan Thompson is a senior editor at High Country News. Follow him on Twitter @jonnypeace.

Howard Johnson
Howard Johnson Subscriber
Aug 22, 2013 10:58 AM
Jonathan, This is only about APS trying to remove the net metering aspect of the present law. APS has gone to the ACC and submitted documents to remove new solar customers from the benefits of net metering, if they install panels on their roofs. The fight, is centered around that issue, and it is the same issue in GA. If the monopoly, APS gets their way, rooftop solar is dead in AZ. http://dontkillsolar.com/site/ And I have solar panels on my roof and would be grandfathered in. I have been to some of these meetings. Have you?
Jonathan Thompson
Jonathan Thompson Subscriber
Aug 22, 2013 11:06 AM
Howard: There are actually two separate fights going on. One is about net metering on rooftop solar, which I've written about here a few times:
http://www.hcn.org/wotr/it2[…]izona2019s-solar-incentives
http://www.hcn.org/[…]/number-crunching-the-arizona-solar-war
 The other is about deregulation. The two are happening at the same time, but are not related. This post is about the latter -- the deregulation battle -- not net metering.
Howard Johnson
Howard Johnson Subscriber
Aug 22, 2013 12:36 PM
Jonathan, The other, separate issue is the fate of the 4 corners power plant. Here is a recent post by the guys in charge; http://www.azcentral.com/op[…]t-compromise-good-news.html
Howard Johnson
Howard Johnson Subscriber
Aug 22, 2013 12:51 PM
Jonathan, Thanks for posting those older articles. I had no way of editing.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. Rancher vs BLM: a 20-year standoff ends with tense roundup |
  2. Photos of a standoff | Armed militia members join a Nevada rancher to pro...
  3. After the standoff, what's next for Bundy and BLM? |
  4. Why homes are lost to wildfire | This Forest Service expert says it's as much a soc...
  5. The energy haves and have-nots | Will rooftop solar owners get off the grid — and...
  1. Why homes are lost to wildfire | This Forest Service expert says it's as much a soc...
  2. Photos of a standoff | Armed militia members join a Nevada rancher to pro...
  3. The energy haves and have-nots | Will rooftop solar owners get off the grid — and...
  4. Will the Colorado River reach the Gulf of California once more? | Photographs of last month's historic water pulses....
  5. Locals resist a Bakkenization of the Beartooths | South-central Montanans oppose new drilling, forew...
 
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone