You are here: home   Blogs   The GOAT Blog   Amid scandal, a top Alaska wildlife official quits
The GOAT Blog

Amid scandal, a top Alaska wildlife official quits

Document Actions
Tip Jar Donation

Your donation supports independent non-profit journalism from High Country News.

Ray Ring | Jan 14, 2012 03:34 PM

Alaska's politically-charged system of wildlife management -- detailed in a 2011 HCN cover story -- is looking disgraceful now.

Corey Rossi -- the controversial director of wildlife conservation, within the Alaska Department of Fish and Game -- has been charged with 12 counts of violating hunting regulations. Rossi, 51, has resigned -- and many of his employees are glad to see him go.

Rossi was a Sarah Palin legacy: Near the end of her brief reign as governor, in December 2008 Palin appointed Rossi to a newly created position with an ominous title -- "assistant commissioner for abundance management." That was code for the desire to kill more wolves and bears, to try to boost populations of moose and caribou, so hunters might have more opportunities to bring home trophy antlers and meat. Then in 2010 Gov. Sean Parnell promoted Rossi to be director of wildlife conservation, overseeing 160 seasonal employees and a $20 million budget, with a mission of encouraging public involvement in wildlife conservation in Alaska.

Before the state jobs, Rossi made his career as a federal predator-killer. In that role, according to the Associated Press, he employed Palin's parents for 14 years (Palin's mother reportedly asked Palin to appoint him to the state agency). Rossi does not have a college degree; while leading the state agency, he pushed for more aerial gunning of wolves, and snaring of bears including grizzlies. He's also been active in the Alaska chapter of Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife, a group that pushes for more killing of wolves around the West.

Rossi and other controversial appointees defended their predator-killing policies in the HCN story -- which was headlined "Palin, politics, and Alaska predator control" -- including the gassing of wolf puppies in a den:

Rossi says it was the most humane way of killing them. "No one likes to kill puppies, and we don't emphasize that we do it. But animal shelters kill 4 million (dog) puppies and kittens a year (and) everyone knows that the animal shelters aren't mean. ... Predator control is not designed to be fair," Rossi says. "It's not fair chase (an ethical standard for hunting). We're supposed to be as efficient as possible."

More than 150 biologists and other experts had signed a series of letters opposing Rossi, saying he lacked credentials and his policies were misguided. In an April 2010 letter, for instance, biologists said Rossi had made "maximum production of wild game meat ... the ... single, overriding objective." They said that "science, rather than politics, should be the guiding philosophy of professional leadership" and "an effective Director must also be able to lead the Division in matters such as habitat protection, biodiversity conservation, endangered species management, and watchable wildlife."

Of course many states have politicians meddling in wildlife management, but as the HCN story showed, that dynamic has been especially obvious in Alaska for many decades. Our writer, Tracy Ross -- an award-winning journalist and book author who has worked as backcountry ranger in Alaska -- chronicled how the state's wildlife agents and hunters kill more than 1,000 wolves per year in the efforts to boost moose and caribou. Alaska voters have passed two ballot measures limiting or banning aerial gunning, yet the Legislature, governors and their appointees repeatedly overrode those ballot measures. A third ballot measure was defeated in 2008 when Palin's administration campaigned heavily against it.

HCN also reported how a great deal of Alaska research shows that predators like wolves do impact prey populations. It's part of a shift in the old prevailing thought that prey and predators naturally interact without population disasters. As Tracy Ross wrote:

With decades of information-gathering like this, Alaska arguably has more knowledge of predator-prey dynamics than any other state. It is knowledge that other states struggling with their own predator issues can learn from, and it includes some surprises that wildlife-lovers may not want to accept. Singling out and killing a sole pack of wolves (including their puppies), for instance, can almost immediately boost a caribou population in danger of extinction. But actions like these are inciting a war between predator-control advocates and those who -- for a variety of reasons -- oppose such tactics. The science informs the politics, but the politics threaten to overrule the science.

In an accompanying HCN essay, headlined "How my thoughts on wolves have changed," Craig Medred, a former outdoors columnist for the Anchorage Daily News, who now works for AlaskaDispatch.com, wrote:

The wolves that periodically venture into the valley behind my home are blood-thirsty killers. That's what I admire about them. They evolved to near perfection in their ecological niche ... I love wolves. And I have come to believe those wolves should die."

One of Alaska's most questionable practices -- the use of snares baited with food to capture and kill hundreds of black bears and dozens of grizzly bears in recent years -- was described by Ross thusly:

According to some people who've seen bear-snaring in action, as soon as a bear is caught by the wire, it jerks frantically trying to free itself. Though the program's supporters say the snares are not painful as long as the bears don't struggle for too long, both black bears and grizzlies have been known to maim themselves while gripped by the wire. Black bears reportedly grunt and moan in a way that sounds like a person crying. At least three grizzlies that were accidentally snared had to be euthanized.

In the wake of Rossi's bust and resignation, more than 70 biologists and former Alaska Gov. Tony Knowles sent another letter to the state Board of Game, protesting the bear-snaring:

Unlike hunting, where a hunter can carefully select for large, male bears, snaring is indiscriminate. Snares catch black bears and brown bears, female bears with cubs, and sometimes even older cubs. ... Snaring and killing of bears regardless of age, species, and gender is incompatible with the scientific principles and the ethics of modern wildlife management including the North American Model for Wildlife Conservation.

And how did Rossi get busted? Wildlife agencies in other states reportedly initiated the investigation. Eventually, according to the charging document, Rossi admitted that he'd taken three out-of-state hunters -- Robert "Bruce" Hubbard from Utah, David Reis from Colorado, and Duane Stroupe from Oregon -- into Alaska's Game Management Unit 16B in June 2008; the out-of-state hunters killed four black bears and Rossi killed one on that trip; then Rossi filed state Alaska paperwork falsely reporting that he'd killed three of the bears the hunters had killed (Reis filed the paperwork for the bear he killed).

It's not clear whether Rossi's resignation, and the scandal, will cause the Alaska agencies to back away from bear snaring, aerial gunning of wolves and occasional gassing of wolf pups. The Board of Game is considering whether to expand the bear-snaring. At that agency's meeting on Friday, a prominent member of the Board of Game, Ted Spraker, said he wants more aerial gunning -- of bears as well as wolves -- and continuation of the bear-snaring.

Rossi's boss until he resigned -- Fish and Game Commissioner Cora Campbell -- told the Anchorage Daily News on Friday:

"... There are some people who would like to make this (Rossi's bust) about the department's programs, but it isn't. This is about an individual; it's not about our programs."

But as HCN reported, Campbell herself is one more questionable appointee: She was also part of Gov. Sarah Palin's administration -- serving as a fisheries policy adviser from 2007 to 2009 -- and her college degree, from Pacific Lutheran University, is in education, not wildlife science.

Since the Alaska programs are created and run by political appointees who often have questionable credentials and goals, then despite what Cora Campbell says, this is all about Alaska's whole system of wildlife management.

Ray Ring is HCN's senior editor, based in Bozeman, Mont.

Robb Cadwell
Robb Cadwell Subscriber
Jan 15, 2012 09:08 PM
Alaska is a funny place. All those mountains lakes and trees yet 80% of the people live in an urban setting.

Of those who live in rural areas half are Alaskan natives 60% harvest game while 80% of rural residents eat game. Incomes are very low.

http://home.gci.net/~thcc/pdf/Philanthro.PDF

While bear snaring seems repulsive to me, so are zoos and animal "rescues". I can certainly see why proven predator control would be important to Alaskan Natives.

I first heard of this program months ago, specifically as a tool to increase moose populations around rural communities. Not for me to say.
Frank Smith
Frank Smith
Jan 16, 2012 11:41 AM
The Commissioner of Wildlife, was a rather inexperienced hire at the Dept. of Fish and Game by Sarah Palin in 2007. She was promoted last year when the current Commissioner got busted for drunk driving. Her only experience was a little commercial fishing, very different from game management.

Rossi was hired in a bogus job that his friend Sarah created for him: The Director of "Abundance Management." That was code for, "Screw the Natives who depend on F&G for subsistence in incredibly poor ancestral remote villages. We want the moose, caribou, etc., for urban, wealthy hunters, represented by organizations such as the Alaska Outdoor Council and the Safari club.

Palin appointed a slew of Commissioners and Directors and an Attorney General who were miles over their head. Her main criteria, as with Rossi, were: Are you a family friend, fellow church member or did you go to Sarah's high school with her?
Frank Smith
Frank Smith
Jan 16, 2012 12:05 PM
My turn: Rossi simply isn't qualified for wildlife director position
Posted: Thursday, March 25, 2010
By Nick Jans

A recent Empire headline read, "Wildlife Director Leaving Juneau." More to the point, scientific wildlife management seems to be leaving Alaska.

Last week, Alaska Department of Fish & Game commissioner Denby Lloyd asked Doug Larsen to step down as director of wildlife conservation, and named in his place assistant commissioner Corey Rossi. Though no official reason was given, the story is plain as a blood trail on snow: Larsen, a respected scientist with more than three decades of ADF&G experience, was summarily replaced by a man brought into the department by former Gov. Sarah Palin to direct part of ADF&G's predator control program.

Predator control, properly informed by rigorous science, can be a valuable wildlife management tool. Unfortunately, that specific, study-driven approach has been fading steadily in the rear view mirror, under the pressure of special interest groups who are bent on shaping wildlife management to their own ends.

With the appointment of Rossi, it's clear that science isn't driving this bus anymore. When he was first named as assistant commissioner in December 2008, ADF&G's own press release was conspicuously mum on the subject of his academic credentials. In fact, Rossi turns out to be a high school graduate who's taken a string of college courses from the Berryman Institute in Utah. Rossi doesn't even have a bachelor's degree in biology, let alone the advanced scientific credentials that characterized past directors. In fact, Rossi's school record wouldn't qualify him to be hired as a junior field biologist.

The sum of Rossi's bona fides (besides being a close friend of the Palin family) is that he worked for the USDA overseeing the control of undesired animals - as one ADF&G biologist put it, a "gopher choker."

While his past employment history may qualify him to snare bears with a baited bucket, the Director of Wildlife Conservation position demands a far wider range of scientific knowledge and experience.

Rossi's hire marks the point at which ADF&G has crossed a threshold that should alarm all Alaskans, as well as the scientific community. In this brave new world, a paralegal can head a law firm; a nurse can direct a team of surgeons, and a high school grad can direct a scientific agency. Though I'm sure some will come forward to defend Rossi, the point stands: he's simply not qualified for the position to which he was appointed. Of course, Rossi did not appoint himself. Commissioner Lloyd is ultimately responsible for this decision, which can only cast serious doubt on his leadership, and upon the credibility of ADF&G.

This credibility only becomes more strained when we come to the matter of Mr. Rossi's connection to the special interest group, Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife/Habitat. Following his initial appointment to ADF&G, the programs for which he lobbied at the behest of SFW/H (notably the wide-scale, virtually limitless killing of black bears in Unit 16B) quickly became ADF&G policy-a startling development, considering that SFW/H is not a scientific organization.

Founded by Utah businessman Don Peay, SFW/H makes no secret of its goals to re-shape wildlife management departments in lower 48 and Alaska through political pressure, in order to promote what they call "abundance-based management"-basically a euphemism for Maximum Sustained Yield, a wildlife Ponzi scheme that would make Bernie Madoff proud. According to SFW/H's philosophy, producing the greatest possible number of meat animals for human hunters is all that matters. All other wildlife issues and other user groups, consumptive or non, are subservient at best.

Though SFW/H claims to adhere to science, they mean only the science that supports their viewpoints and ends. As illustration of the very real pressure they bring to bear on the department, consider an email SFW/H spokesman Dane Crowley sent to Denby Lloyd (and cc'd to Rossi) on July 14, 2009, identifying career biologists by name that he wanted disciplined or fired-basically telling ADF&G its business in a very specific and vehement manner.

Lloyd's surprisingly cordial response (obtained through a public documents request) concludes with, "I look forward to continued cooperation between ADF&G and groups such as yours in meeting ... wildlife management objectives for Alaska."

When the lines between an extremist special interest group and a state agency become this blurred, something's deeply wrong. It's time for concerned Alaskans to demand a full official inquiry.

• Nick Jans is an Alaska writer and photographer.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. Rancher vs BLM: a 20-year standoff ends with tense roundup |
  2. Photos of a standoff | Armed militia members join a Nevada rancher to pro...
  3. After the standoff, what's next for Bundy and BLM? |
  4. Why homes are lost to wildfire | This Forest Service expert says it's as much a soc...
  5. The energy haves and have-nots | Will rooftop solar owners get off the grid — and...
  1. Why homes are lost to wildfire | This Forest Service expert says it's as much a soc...
  2. Photos of a standoff | Armed militia members join a Nevada rancher to pro...
  3. The energy haves and have-nots | Will rooftop solar owners get off the grid — and...
  4. Will the Colorado River reach the Gulf of California once more? | Photographs of last month's historic water pulses....
  5. Locals resist a Bakkenization of the Beartooths | South-central Montanans oppose new drilling, forew...
 
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone