Supreme Court to states: Live up to your treaty obligations

Will future courts order states to take down fish-blocking dams?

 

Paul VanDevelder is a contributor to Writers on the Range, the opinion service of High Country News. He is the author of “Coyote Warrior: One Man, Three Tribes, and the Trial that Forged a Nation.”

A landmark decision this June from the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the rights of several tribes to hunt, gather and fish on the Northwest coast of Washington state, thereby ending a 50-year battle over Native American sovereignty and states’ rights.  

A narrow reading of this decision would focus primarily on fish counts and what the state of Washington will have to pay to remove close to 2,000 road culverts, impediments to fish migration. But a broader reading shows its real importance: Very few cases have come down the pike with more far-reaching implications for state governments.

Workers lower a segment of a new, fish-friendly culvert into place in Bellevue, Washington, in 2012.

Thanks to promises made to Northwest tribes in the mid-1850s by Isaac Stevens, Washington’s first territorial governor, no state has a more impressive record of losing legal battles with Indian tribes than Washington does. President Franklin Pierce sent Stevens to the region to negotiate with Native tribes and open the Oregon Territory to white settlement. The legal trickery Stevens used to accomplish those ends has come back to haunt lawmakers for generations.  

Stevens promised lower Puget Sound tribes the perpetual right to “hunt, gather, and fish in all of the usual and accustomed places.” But he also told a cheering audience of white settlers in Olympia that his real objective was to promise the tribes anything in order to “extinguish, as quickly as possible, their claims to traditional lands so that settlers could be given legal title.” 

Stevens’ approach to ethnic cleansing eventually led to war with the Nez Perce, the Umatilla and the Yakama tribes, while some of his other treaties led to century-long battles in federal courts. To their credit, our nation’s founders anticipated these conflicts and designated treaties “the supreme law of the land” under Article VI, Clause 2, of the U.S. Constitution. This solemn trustee-guarantor partnership between tribes and the federal government has been the backbone of federal Indian law ever since 1832, when Chief Justice John Marshall’s “trust doctrine” made it the federal government’s fiduciary responsibility to safeguard the rights and resources of treaty tribes, trumping all other obligations. 

Washington’s legal battles began with United States v. Winans in 1905, over the Yakama Nations treaty right to hunt, gather and fish in their “usual and accustomed place,” which happened to be owned by white people. Fast-forward to today, and the just-decided culverts case resolves litigation that began almost 50 years ago, when Washington state Attorney General and future Republican Sen. Slade Gorton challenged the scope of the tribes’ fishing rights, hoping to extinguish them forever.

As in the Winans case, Washington state’s 1970 lawsuit relied on states’ rights to carry the day. Attorney General Gorton raised three questions about the Stevens treaties. Did they guarantee the tribes a percentage of the annual commercial catch? Are hatchery-bred fish included in that percentage? Finally, did Native rights implicitly include protections from environmental degradation that would render the tribes’ fishing rights useless?

The now-famous 1974 Boldt Decision answered the first question by guaranteeing tribes half of the commercial salmon catch. The second answer was easy: The allocation could not be limited to hatchery-raised fish. The third question was bandied back and forth in courts for decades. In the end, it proved to be the state’s undoing. 

Washington was counting on the reluctance of lower courts to place the burden of “environmental servitude” on the state. But in 2007, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals clarified that burden by ruling that the Stevens treaties impose “a duty upon the state to refrain from building and operating culverts (thousands of them) … that hinder fish passage and thereby diminish the number of fish that would otherwise be available for tribal harvest.” 

The cost for removing those culverts and other impediments to fish migration could run into the billions. Headlines in newspapers will doubtless focus on the dollars and the fish counts, but the beating heart of this case lies in its willingness to ask if states could be held responsible for safeguarding Native-owned natural resources protected by treaties.  

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals answered in the affirmative, and the Supremes let that ruling stand, saying to Washington state, in effect: You should have taken the Boldt Decision seriously and prepared remedies for all these treaty violations before the salmon became a protected species. Don’t blame the tribes for your failure to live up to your obligations.  

Now, the question no state wants to ask is how will future courts divine the difference between the culverts that stop fish from reaching their breeding beds, and all the dams that do the same thing?

Note: the opinions expressed in this column are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of High Country News, its board or staff. If you'd like to share an opinion piece of your own, please write Betsy Marston at [email protected].

High Country News Classifieds
  • LAND ACQUISTIONS SPECIALIST - RENEWABLE ENERGY
    Energiekontor US seeks experienced local candidate, must reside in western South Dakota. Send resume and cover letter to: [email protected]
  • TRANSPORTATION PLANNER
    TRANSPORTATION PLANNER Exciting opportunity to lead the charge on meeting the future transportation demands of our community! This position will develop, coordinate, and implement the...
  • EARNED MEDIA MANAGER WITH WESTERN RESOURCE ADVOCATES
    Founded in 1989, Western Resource Advocates (WRA) is dedicated to protecting the Wests land, air, and water to ensure that vibrant communities exist in balance...
  • WILDLAND FIRE INSTRUCTOR
    Needed: instructor with 5 years *documented* instruction experience, current qualifications, M-410 or equivalent, and able to work as-needed for NM non-profit working with at-risk youth.
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
    Seeking passionate full-time Executive to lead the oldest non-profit organization in Idaho. Must have knowledge of environmental issues, excellent organizational, verbal presentation and written skills,...
  • COLORADO PROGRAM MANAGER
    The National Parks Conservation Association, the leading non-profit conservation organization protecting Americas national parks, seeks a Program Manager for its Colorado Field Office located in...
  • CONSERVATION DIRECTOR
    Carbondale based public lands advocate, Wilderness Workshop, seeks a Conservation Director to help direct and shape the future of public land conservation on the West...
  • DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR WATER PLANNING WITH WRA'S HEALTHY RIVERS PROGRAM
    Founded in 1989, Western Resource Advocates (WRA) is dedicated to protecting the Wests land, air, and water to ensure that vibrant communities exist in balance...
  • TROUT UNLIMITED BIGHORN RIVER BASIN PROJECT MANAGER
    The Bighorn River Basin Project Manager identifies and implements projects to improve streamflows, restore stream and riparian habitat, improve fish passage and rehabilitate or replace...
  • NON-PROFIT OPERATIONS MANAGER
    One of the most renowned community-based collaboratives in the country seeks full-time Operations Manager to oversee administrative, financial, fund development, and board development duties. BS/BA...
  • RUSTIC HORSE PROPERTY
    in NM. 23 acres, off the grid, rustic cabin, organic gardens, fruit trees, fenced, call 505-204-8432 evenings.
  • DIRECTOR OF VISITOR SERVICES & BOOKSTORE OPERATIONS
    The San Juan Mountains Association in Durango, CO is seeking a Director of Visitor Services & Bookstore Operations to lead our visitor information program &...
  • SOLAR POWERED HOME NEAR CAPITOL REEF NATIONAL PARK
    1800 sf home on 4.12 acres surrounded by Natl Forest and recreational opportunities in a beautiful area (Happy Valley) between Torrey and Boulder. [email protected], www.bouldermoutainreality/properties/grover/off-the-grid-in-happy-valley,...
  • 40 ACRE ORGANIC FARM
    potential fruit/hay with house, Hotchkiss, CO, Scott Ellis, 970-420-0472, [email protected]
  • LAND CONSERVATION DIRECTOR
    Manage, develop and implement all stewardship and land management plans and activities on both private and public lands. Guide and direct comprehensive planning efforts, provide...
  • INTERNET-BASED BUSINESS FOR SALE
    Dream of owning your own business, being your own boss, working from home ... this is the one. 928-380-6570, www.testshop.com. More info at https://bit.ly/2Kgi340.
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
    If you are deeply committed to public service and would like to become part of our high performing, passionate and diverse team, NCAT is looking...
  • TRIPLEX .8 ACRE KANAB, UT
    Create a base in the center of Southern Utah's Grand Circle of National Parks. Multiple residential property with three established rental units and zoning latitude...
  • FORGE & FAB SHOP
    with home on one beautiful acre in Pocatello, ID. Blackrock Forge - retiring after 43 years! Fully equipped 5,500 sf shop including office, gallery and...
  • SMALL FARM AT THE BASE OF MOUNT SHASTA
    Certified organic fruit/berry/veggie/flower farm. Home, barns, garage, separate apt, more. Just under 2 ac, edge of town. Famously pure air and water. Skiing, mountaineering, bike,...