On the Klamath, a surprising win for river advocates

Dam removals on the Oregon-California border move forward without water deals for irrigators.

 

Earlier this week, the Department of the Interior announced that four dams on the Klamath River would come down. The dam removals signal a win for environmentalists, sportsmen, and tribes, but they also come without an accompanying set of water agreements, which Congress failed to enact late last year. In the end, it didn’t come down to negotiations, but simple economics: the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission determined that the costs of retrofitting the dams along the Oregon-California border far exceeded the costs of decommissioning them.

The dams on the Lower Klamath will be removed in 2021, and although river and salmon restoration look likely, the basin’s irrigators could experience shut-offs in drought years that could re-spark the water wars that have waged in the basin for decades. The dam removals will allow 300 miles of river to flow freely, restoring salmon runs and improving water quality. In turn, the tribes and fishermen that depend on the river and the environmental groups that have long sought to improve water quality for marine birds and fish have succeeded.

“The sad thing is that a much needed dam removal has been delayed for many years because it was held hostage for political reasons by a wildly expensive and controversial water deal,” says Jim McCarthy, a spokesman for WaterWatch, a conservation group involved in the early stages of the broader pact’s negotiations. “Now finally salmon runs can be restored.”

Klamath Basin tribes and allies from the commercial fishing and conservation community stage a rally at the 2006 meeting of the International Hydropower Industry.
Patrick McCully, Flickr User

The decision vindicates groups that felt the Klamath Agreements, which were negotiated for decades, fell short. Conservation and environmental groups and many of the Basin’s tribal nations were excluded from the Klamath Agreements’ final package. Now, they’re getting exactly what they wanted: Dam removal with no strings attached.

“The irony is that environmental groups thought it was so important to make a deal with irrigators because they had political power, but 10 years later and no, we didn’t need them at all,” says Steve Pedery, conservation director of Oregon Wild, an environmental group left out of the final Klamath Agreements’ three-part pact because of an impasse with irrigators over potato and onion farming within wildlife refuges.

The Klamath Agreements were designed to settle one of the West’s most unbending water conflicts. For decades, farmers, fishermen, tribes and environmental groups in 15 counties in Oregon and California battled over more than 700 river miles in the Klamath River Basin, a 12,000-square-mile swath of Northern California and southern Oregon. In 2001, the federal government shut off farmers’ water to protect endangered coho salmon and suckers. The following year, irrigators got their water, but a massive fish die-off ensued, beginning an intractable tug of war.

So, for over a decade, more than 50 stakeholders — from conservative ranching and farming irrigators to utility groups, politicians, Tribal Nations, conservation and environmental groups — all came together. And they more or less came to a compromise.

The result was the three-part Klamath River Agreements, a set of compromises that seemed to have something for nearly everyone. But Congress failed to enact the pact in 2010 and again in 2015, rendering much of that effort moot: no minimum flows for irrigators, or tribal development, or river restoration or fish or wildlife.

Conservative legislators primarily objected to the prospect of dam removal, which “presents a very tough ideological challenge for some members of Congress,” says Bob Gravely, spokesman for PacifiCorp, the utility company that owns the dams on the Klamath River.

Congressional inaction — due largely in part to avoid the precedent of a significant dam removal — restarted the FERC relicensing process, which expedited dam removal. Pedery, of Oregon Wild, says he knew dam removal would have to happen outside of federal approval. 

But the dams became an issue of economics, outside of politics. Implementing the Klamath Agreements would have required $800 million of federal funding to remove the dams and to implement the ensuing water deals made contingent on decommissioning. Retrofitting the dams would have cost more than $460 million, according to the Department of Interior. Removing them will cost an estimated $250 million. FERC decided on the latter.

“It’s bittersweet because we’ve really come full circle,” Pedery says. “The real tragedy is we squandered a decade. The dams have stayed in throughout this process and no environmental problems have been solved. Literally nothing has happened.” 

Dam removals may be cause for celebration among some groups, but without accompanying water guarantees for irrigators, like the Klamath Water Users’ Association that represents ranchers and farmers in the basin, there’s no protection for water shut-offs during drought which could lead to a reiteration of violence and legal battles akin to 2001.

“We like dams, but in this case, they serve no agricultural purpose whatsoever,” says Greg Addington, former head of the Klamath Water Users. “The sad thing for us, and the thing we worried about for years, is that dam removal could happen without a water deal going with it. What a missed opportunity.”

Paige Blankenbuehler is an editorial fellow at High Country News. She tweets

High Country News Classifieds
  • CLIMATE CHANGE COORDINATOR
    The Greater Yellowstone Coalition is seeking a Climate Change Coordinator to play a lead role in shaping our programs to make the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem...
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
    Executive Director Position Announcement POSITION TITLE: Executive Director ORGANIZATION: Friends of Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument REPORTING TO: Board of Directors EMPLOYMENT TYPE: Part-time - Full-time, based...
  • HEALTHY CITIES PROGRAM DIRECTOR
    The Healthy Cities Program Director leads and manages the Healthy Cities Program for the Arizona Chapter and is responsible for developing and implementing innovative, high...
  • CONSERVATION PROGRAM MANAGER
    Grand Staircase Escalante Partners (GSEP) Conservation Programs Manager Job Opening Our Mission: Honoring the past and safeguarding the future of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument through...
  • ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR
    Grand Staircase Escalante Partners (GSEP) Associate Director Job Posting Our Mission: Honoring the past and safeguarding the future of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument through science,...
  • UNIQUE, ENERGY-EFFICIENT HOME ON ACREAGE NEAR MOSCOW, IDAHO
    Custom-built energy-efficient 3000 sqft two-story 3BR home, 900 sqft 1 BR accessory cottage above 2-car garage and large shop. Large horse barn. $1,200,000. See online...
  • OUTDOOR ADVENTURE BUSINESS FOR SALE
    Missoula Outdoor Learning Adventures (MOLA) - established and profitable outdoor adventure & education business in Missoula, Montana. Summer camp, raft & climb guide, teen travel,...
  • OJO SARCO FARM/HOME
    A wonderful country setting for a farm/work 1350s.f. frame home plus 1000 studio/workshop. 5 acres w fruit trees, an irrigation well, pasture and a small...
  • STEWARDSHIP COORDINATOR
    Join Skagit Land Trust (the Trust), a not-for-profit conservation organization based in Mount Vernon, Washington, and help protect land for people and wildlife. Skagit Land...
  • 2022 SEASONAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR
    The Mount St. Helens Institute Science Educator supports our science education and rental programs including day and overnight programs for youth ages 6-18, their families...
  • POLICY DIRECTOR
    Heart of the Rockies Initiative is seeking a Policy Director to lead and define policy efforts to advance our mission to keep working lands and...
  • CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    Self-Help Enterprises seeks an experienced and strategic CFO
  • CONSERVATION SPECIALIST - LAND PROTECTION FOCUS
    View full job description and how to apply at
  • RIVER EDUCATOR & GUIDE
    River Educator & Guide River Educator & Guide (Trip Leader) Non-exempt, Seasonal Position: Full-time OR part-time (early April through October; may be flexible with start/end...
  • LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION DIRECTOR
    The Land and Water Conservation Director is a full-time salaried position with the Mountain Area Land Trust in Evergreen, CO. The successful candidate will have...
  • FOOD SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL FELLOWSHIP
    If you were to design a sustainable society from the ground up, it would look nothing like the contemporary United States. But what would it...
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
    The Rio Grande Headwaters Land Trust (RiGHT) is seeking an Executive Director who will lead RiGHT toward a future of continued high conservation impact, organizational...
  • COMMUNITY ORGANIZER
    Help protect Montana's water quality, family farms and ranches, & unique quality of life. Work hard, meet good people, make the world a better place!...
  • NEW BOOK:
    True Wildlife Tales From Boy to Man. Finding my voice to save wildlife in the Apache spirit. 365+ vivid colorful pictures. Buy on Amazon/John Wachholz
  • CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER
    with Rural Community Assistance Corporation. Apply here: https://www.marcumllp.com/executive-search/chief-operations-officer-rcac