This story was produced by RE:PUBLIC Lands Media and is co-published here by permission.
For the last 25 years, 58 million acres of American forest have had no new roads, no logging equipment, and no reason to appear on anyone’s industrial map. This year that is changing — and much faster than most people realize. The 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule has functioned as a safeguard for some of the most secluded and pristine lands in the Western U.S, prohibiting the construction of roads as well as timber harvesting on 30% of the acreage managed by the U.S. Forest Service. These pockets have remained as negative space shaded in green on maps of North America and have resisted change as development has impacted everything around them. The Roadless Rule was a boundary that defined where industrialization stopped and where nature began.
On June 23, 2025, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins announced the intent to rescind the rule entirely. As of 2026, the process has moved into its most critical phase; the U.S. Department of Agriculture has announced an imminent release of the draft environmental impact statement and a formal proposed rule this spring. This release triggers a final public comment period before a definitive decision is expected in late 2026.
Compounding this shift, on March 31, the USDA issued a formal reorganization order for the Forest Service. This structural overhaul, including the moving or closure of regional offices and science centers, is anticipated to accelerate the implementation of extraction orders. While the specific timeline remains under development, the move signals a pivot toward a more aggressive, leaner extraction-oriented management model for the agency.
These shifts have their origins in an executive order that shifts the foundation of the West’s backcountry. On March 1, 2025, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14225 (Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production), mandating a 25% increase in timber volume across federal lands. Secretary Rollins followed that up last April with an “emergency situation determination,” covering 112.6 million acres of national forest system land. The order cited the need for rapidly scaled-up timber extraction — ostensibly to combat loss of value due to wildfire and insect infestation. The geographic reality of this memorandum, mapped by RE:PUBLIC for this article, is striking: the areas now targeted for logging on a scale not seen since the 1970s overlap with more than half of the area previously protected by the Roadless Rule. That effectively fast-tracks the opening of 25.7 million acres of pristine landscape to logging, allowing the industry to move forward now rather than wait for the rule’s final repeal.
This administrative acceleration bypasses another significant legal and ethical hurdle: the federal mandate to consult with federally recognized tribal governments, which maintain inherent sovereignty, treaty and reserved rights, and ancestral connections to approximately 44.7 million acres of inventoried roadless areas across 36 states — lands now threatened by the USDA’s proposed rescission. The federal government’s failure to consult with them violates its own longstanding regulations, including USDA executive orders mandating collaboration.
The Forest Service has already begun fast-tracking projects. The “emergency situation” allows the agency to bypass standard environmental reviews on roadless national forest lands while the formal repeal is still technically pending. This creates a scenario where the physical character of the backcountry can be altered by road construction and timber harvesting long before the legal status of the land is officially changed.
For many observers, the question is no longer whether the Roadless Rule will be repealed, but how much of the roadless landscape will remain by the time the legal process concludes.
The geography of roadless protections: This map series illustrates the 58 million acres originally protected by the 2001 Roadless Rule. While the 2025 federal repeal targets 44.7 million acres nationally, the states of Idaho and Colorado are shown in distinct colors. These states successfully petitioned for their own independent, state-specific federal regulations — codified in 2008 and 2012, respectively — and remain legally insulated from any rescission of the Roadless Rule. As a result, the roadless landscapes in Idaho and Colorado serve as a buffer against the sudden shift in national policy.
A legacy of backcountry protection
The 2001 Roadless Rule was originally established to address an $8.5 billion backlog in road maintenance incurred by the Forest Service. It was a recognition that the Forest Service could not afford to maintain, let alone expand, its existing 380,000-mile road network — the largest managed road infrastructure of any one government entity on the planet.
It also protected the ecological integrity of the 30% of forest lands that remained undeveloped. These inventoried roadless areas were designated to preserve wildlife corridors, protect clean watersheds and provide a baseline of biological diversity — ensuring that these 58 million acres remained the most resilient parts of the national forest system, free from the habitat fragmentation that follows industrial development.
The rule served as a hedge in the agency’s budget, allowing the government to avoid the compounding costs of future maintenance in steep, unstable terrain. The move to repeal it suggests a return to a management style where the cost of infrastructure is subsidized by timber receipts, a model that many economists argue was the primary cause of the agency’s multi-billion-dollar maintenance backlog in the first place.
Recreation has long been the primary argument in the media for leaving the Roadless Rule intact. The logic is easy to visualize: 159 million annual visitors seek out the 77,000 miles of recreational trails and 2,500 miles of designated Wild and Scenic Rivers that lie within roadless areas. Outdoor recreation on Forest Service land contributes more than $45 billion a year to the nation’s gross domestic product. That consistently outweighs the economic footprint of industrial logging, particularly considering the long-term sustainability of tourism versus the boom-and-bust cycle of timber harvesting.
Increased timber extraction: Highlighted here are the areas where President Trump’s Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production (Executive Order 14225), issued in March 2025, has designated firm plans for increased harvest. This directive stipulates a 25% increase in annual timber sales to reach a national quota of 4 billion board feet by 2028.
The infrastructure of nature
Beyond recreation, roadless areas provide hard economic, cultural and health benefits for most Americans — whether or not they ever go near a national forest. In rural communities across the country, the presence of intact, roadless backcountry is a driver of property values, a source of drinking water and a resource for local business revenue.
Approximately 125.5 million people — roughly 39% of the population of the continental United States — get about 10% of their drinking water from Forest Service lands. They act as massive, natural filtration systems, scrubbing pollutants and regulating the timing of snowmelt. The current directive targets 32.25 million acres of what the Forest Service classifies as high-importance drinking water landscape.
According to decades of the Forest Service’s own research, roads are the primary cause of water quality degradation in forested environments. When a road is cut into a steep backcountry slope, it alters the natural hydrology of the mountain. It creates a channel for soil erosion and increases sedimentation in streams, which can overwhelm municipal filtration systems and force taxpayers to fund expensive new treatment infrastructure. The Roadless Rule functioned as an insurance policy for the American taxpayer, protecting the purity of headwaters from development interests. Now the legal hurdles that once prevented road construction in these sensitive watersheds have been significantly lowered.
This push for extraction also affects 20 million acres of critical habitat for endangered or threatened species. For many animals, a road is more than just a strip of gravel; it is a barrier to migration and a source of constant stress. And the fragmentation of large habitats into smaller, isolated islands is one of the leading drivers of species decline. Then there’s fire. While the USDA cites wildfire mitigation as a justification for the emergency order, data from the Western Fire Chiefs Association indicates that the majority of wildfire ignitions — over 90% in some regions — are human caused. Adding hundreds of miles of logging roads to previously roadless tracts increases the risk of accidental ignitions by expanding human and vehicle access into the heart of forests. Industrial logging can increase fire risk in the short term by leaving behind slash (debris piles from cut trees), which dries out quickly and acts as kindling. And by removing large, fire-resilient trees and opening the canopy, logging can change the forest’s microclimate, making it hotter, windier, and more susceptible to fast-moving fires.
Logging directive and overlap areas: This map distinguishes the overlap where the expansion of timber harvesting directive aligns with roadless areas, including a portion of the 9 million roadless acres within Alaska’s Tongass National Forest, where the convergence of the Roadless Repeal and the “emergency situation” has triggered widespread concern over old-growth harvest among Tlingit & Haida Nations.
A de-democratized public lands process
The most imminent logging is currently planned for the Pacific Northwest and Northern Rockies. Under President Trump’s Timber Extraction Directive, the Forest Service is working toward a 25% increase in timber volume, which would account for 4 billion board feet by 2028. In certain national forest districts, planning has moved into the site-specific phase, where the use of the emergency designation allows contractors to begin establishing survey camps and salvage infrastructure in a fraction of the traditional time. This industrial acceleration threatens the recovery of ecosystems that are only recently beginning to stabilize.
In Alaska, for example, where the Tongass National Forest contains 9.2 million roadless acres, the threat is both ecological and economic. The Tlingit & Haida Nations have formally called on the USDA to suspend its decision until meaningful consultation is held. “Our forests are just now healing from the extensive clear-cut logging in the past,” says Joel Jackson, president of the Organized Village of Kake, a federally recognized Tlingit tribe. “Number one is food security, and our deer and moose are rebounding. The remaining old growth timber is so important for providing shelter, the berries and our medicines. It provides shade for our streams to keep them cool, so our salmon can return year after year.”
According to a statement from Judith LeBlanc, executive director of Native Organizers Alliance and a member of Oklahoma’s Caddo Nation, “The Trump administration has weakened environmental impact assessments by cutting public comment periods and limiting reviews of impacts on public lands. On top of that, they have also refused to engage in the legally required consultations with Tribal nations. Tribes have an inherent right to determine the future of their ancestral homelands. Consultation and consent is not optional.”
“Tribes have an inherent right to determine the future of their ancestral homelands. Consultation and consent is not optional.”
Across the board, public sentiment remains heavily skewed toward preservation, creating a significant disconnect between the administration and the citizenry. An analysis by the Center for Western Priorities, a nonprofit that advocates for clean energy and conservation in the West, of the 625,000 comments submitted by the public during last September’s initial government comment period showed that 99% of respondents favored keeping the Roadless Rule intact — a level of consensus almost unheard of in federal rulemaking.
Despite this overwhelming opposition, a new comment period is expected following the release of the draft environmental impact statement. Many critics argue that the comment period is a formality, given that the emergency order allows projects to move forward much faster than the typical multi-year planning cycle. Many of these projects are expected to be active on the ground as early as this summer.
The emergency logging directive represents a shift toward a commodity-first management style that treats our national forests more like a timber warehouse than a complex, multi-functional ecosystem. It essentially trades long-term ecological services such as carbon sequestration, water filtration and wildlife habitat for short-term industrial access. The emergency framing allows for a level of extraction that has not been seen in public lands for 50 years.
As the Forest Service implements the directive, our roadless areas enter a period of uncertainty. The long-term costs — measured in degraded water quality, lost recreation revenue, greater wildfire potential and the decline of sensitive species — will ultimately far outweigh the short-term volume of timber removed from the land. The Trump administration’s vision of public lands as a temporary resource is in direct conflict with the foundational mandate of the Forest Service, as stated by the agency’s first chief, Gifford Pinchot: “to provide the greatest good for the greatest number of people in the long run.”
Infrastructure of critical public assets: This map shows where the logging order directive overlaps with some of our most valued natural resources: 77,000 miles of recreational trail, 2,500 miles of designated Wild & Scenic Rivers, multiple wilderness areas, and 20 million acres of critical habitat for threatened or endangered species.
We welcome reader letters. Email High Country News at editor@hcn.org or submit a letter to the editor. See our letters to the editor policy.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
