<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://www.hcn.org/search_rss" >
  <title>High Country News</title>
  <link>http://www.hcn.org</link>
  
  <description>
    
            These are the search results for the query, showing results 1 to 2.
        
  </description>
  
  
  
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://www.hcn.org/logo.jpg" />

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hcn.org/wotr/pushed-to-the-wall-we-can-power-down" />
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hcn.org/wotr/17595" />
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://www.hcn.org/wotr/pushed-to-the-wall-we-can-power-down">        <title>Pushed to the wall, we can power down</title>        <link>http://www.hcn.org/wotr/pushed-to-the-wall-we-can-power-down</link>        <description>Tim Lydon tells how Juneau, Alaska, cut its energy consumption by over 40 percent when its electricity supply was interrupted by avalanches. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Tim Lydon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>Energy conservation</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>Port Snettisham avalanches</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>Alaska</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>Global warming</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>Tim Lydon</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>Electricity supply</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>Juneau</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2010-02-05T10:05:07Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Article</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hcn.org/wotr/17595">        <title>No way to run a national park</title>        <link>http://www.hcn.org/wotr/17595</link>        <description>Tim Lydon wonders what happened to a recent environmental
impact statement that may have irked railroads by favoring
snowsheds over controlled avalanches in Glacier National
Park.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Tim Lydon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>Tim Lydon</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>Glacier National Park</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>railroad industry</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>Bush
environmental policy</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>environmental impact statements</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>controlled
avalanches</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>snowsheds</dc:subject>        
                    <dc:subject>National Park Service</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2010-02-05T09:45:33Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Article</dc:type>    </item>



</rdf:RDF>
