Jon Margolis' otherwise excellent "Washington Watch" column Sept. 16 contained the following sentence: "Bill Clinton has the aesthetic sensibilities of a frog." On behalf of the Amphibian-American community, I would like to state that this is an unfair and unkind slur against frogs.
What would a moonlit evening be without the musical chorus of spring peepers? The Louisiana bayous would not be half so mysterious without the imposing voice of the bullfrog; Great Basin waterways would be deathly silent without the cheerful croak of the spadefoot toad. I'll pass over the number of mosquito and fly bites that outdoors-loving humans would suffer without the help of friendly batrachians.
HCN has done a good job of defending our habitats - now give some thought to our dignity! Just because we're warty doesn't mean we don't need self-esteem.
West Linn, Oregon
- C.C. Havens on A day on the river that ended in a death
- Robb Cadwell on Did Obama's Interior hobble the Endangered Species Act?
- Trey Turnbull on Wolf pups, and the return of wild wonder
- Michael Jakubcin on Two degrees warmer and rising: A review of A Great Aridness
- Roy Brophy on Forest Service’s mission goes up in flames