Many Eastern and Midwestern Republicans were swayed by debate on July 24 when DeFazio claimed that the $710 million worth of pumps, canals and reservoirs meant porkbarrel spending and environmental degradation. Project proponents countered that construction was essential to satisfy a water treaty with two Ute Indian tribes. But some Indians are celebrating the project's setback. "This doesn't have to do with economic and financial benefits for the tribes," says Southern Ute Councilman Ray Frost.
"It's a feather in our cap, a sign that someone in Washington is finally listening to our concerns that we've been used on a water issue."
The amendment may next go to the Senate where Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell, R-Colo., vows to secure funding for the project.
* Heather Abel
- The taxpayer money that fuels federal land transfer demands
- Latest: California fracking companies inject protected aquifers with wastewater
- Obama's preemptive strike to reform Endangered Species Act
- Wyoming trespass law is the latest in grazing battle
- Sightseeing at an open pit mine in Arizona copper country
- Robb Cadwell on The view from 31,000 feet: A philosopher looks at fracking
- Amy & Chris Gulick on The view from 31,000 feet: A philosopher looks at fracking
- Richard H Ernst on The taxpayer money that fuels federal land transfer demands
- Luwella Leonardi on Blood Quantum
- Alaina Huxtable on Blood Quantum