But after squeaking through the Senate, the bill by State Sen. Tom Norton, R, was pulled from consideration in the House March 11, effectively killing the measure.
"This is a great victory for local government and conservationists," says Mark Lewis, staff director for Clean Water Action. "They realized they didn't have the votes."
Norton claimed his bill was an "anti-takings' bill intended to protect individual property rights. But a coalition of environmentalists and county commissioners saw it as special-interest legislation that would leave counties with no defenses against developers.
"If you believe in local control, you wouldn't vote for it," says State Sen. Tilman Bishop, R, who called it a potential "water grab."
Norton introduced the bill shortly after the courts upheld Eagle County's right to use1041 regulations to hold off Homestake II, a massive water-transfer project pushed by the Front Range cities of Aurora and Colorado Springs (HCN, 12/12/94).
- Michael/Teresa Newberry on American Indian students in Utah face harsh discipline
- Penelope Blair on Rains bring incomplete drought relief to parts of Southwest
- W. Fred Sanders on American Indian students in Utah face harsh discipline
- Jennafer Waggoner-Yellowhorse on American Indian students in Utah face harsh discipline
- Steve Snyder on Making a monument from scratch