But after squeaking through the Senate, the bill by State Sen. Tom Norton, R, was pulled from consideration in the House March 11, effectively killing the measure.
"This is a great victory for local government and conservationists," says Mark Lewis, staff director for Clean Water Action. "They realized they didn't have the votes."
Norton claimed his bill was an "anti-takings' bill intended to protect individual property rights. But a coalition of environmentalists and county commissioners saw it as special-interest legislation that would leave counties with no defenses against developers.
"If you believe in local control, you wouldn't vote for it," says State Sen. Tilman Bishop, R, who called it a potential "water grab."
Norton introduced the bill shortly after the courts upheld Eagle County's right to use1041 regulations to hold off Homestake II, a massive water-transfer project pushed by the Front Range cities of Aurora and Colorado Springs (HCN, 12/12/94).
- Deb Dedon on Should the president of the Navajo Nation speak Navajo?
- Deb O'Neill on Wyoming grapples with how to fund wildlife conservation
- Bill Williams on Wyoming grapples with how to fund wildlife conservation
- Nathan Johnson on Wyoming grapples with how to fund wildlife conservation
- Jim Scarborough on For climate activists, a bright spot in a dismal election