For hundreds of years, rural Hispanics have gathered
firewood from the forests of northern New Mexico. After all, it was
once their land, given to them in Spanish land grants as far back
as the late 17th century. Even after the Forest Service took
control of the land grants in the early 1900s, local families
continued to heat their homes with wood collected in the
forest.
But last September, Carson National
Forest officials told the locals they would face new rules when
they collected firewood. They said a lawsuit brought by
environmentalists to protect the threatened Mexican spotted owl had
forced a halt to logging and restricted firewood gathering, even
though owls had only been found in one remote
area.
Shortly after the announcement, angry
Hispanic residents joined timber and mining owners and employees in
Santa Fe, where they burned an effigy of Sam Hitt of Forest
Guardians and John Talberth of the Forest Conservation Council. The
two men had been plaintiffs in the lawsuit to protect
owls.
"Environmentalists haven't wanted to take
the blame for their actions," says Max Cordova, leader of the 300
families of the Truchas Land Grant. "Until they recognize that, how
can we deal with them?"
Twenty-two rural
families will run out of wood within a month, says Cordova's son
David, and later this winter he expects about 150 local families to
need wood.
The drama has attracted national
media, including the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, CBS, NBC
and talk radio. The stories usually pit the poor families and their
shrinking woodpiles against white, urban environmentalists more
concerned about a bird than about people.
But
environmentalists say the press has the story wrong. To change the
public's perception, they have been running full-page newspaper ads
and delivering firewood to needy families.
The
truth, environmentalists say, is that the Forest Service has
allowed unrestricted firewood collection to degrade the Carson
National Forest; now the agency has pinned the blame on the spotted
owl and environmentalists.
"Even if the owl
injunction did not come down we'd still have a firewood crisis in
(the town of) Truchas," Hitt says. The ground there is picked
clean, he says, and "looks like a third-world forest." He argues
that the Forest Service could have avoided the firewood controversy
by aggressively pursuing energy conservation and instituting a more
restrictive firewood program.
"As long as it
takes nine cords to heat a drafty little adobe in New Mexico, we're
going to have a problem."
Environmentalists say
that a book published in 1985 shows that the forest's firewood
program hasn't been sustainable for years. In Enchantment and
Exploitation, William deBuys writes that in 1977, more than 1,700
cords of green piûon and juniper firewood were cut from a
district in the Carson National Forest. But biologically, the
district could provide only 250 cords a year
sustainably.
It's overcutting that has
deteriorated wildlife habitat on the Carson National Forest, says
Hitt. He points to a New Mexico Game and Fish Department study that
says the forest has the lowest density of standing dead trees, or
snags, in the region. The agency told the Forest Service it should
retain three snags per acre. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
recently told the Forest Service it should ban firewood collectors
from cutting snags.
Even if the owl isn't found
in the forest, snags are still crucial for other forest species who
use them for nesting, says Jennifer Fowler-Propst, New Mexico
supervisor for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
This year, the Carson National Forest expects
about 4,700 households to collect a total of 20,000 cords. Carson
Forest staffers say that still leaves an average of almost 300,000
cords from logging slash and trees that die naturally. Critics like
Hitt say the forest is being hit harder than the numbers
show.
But because the Carson National Forest
encompasses many Spanish land grants, it can't be managed as other
forests are, says Gary Schiff, a community affairs officer who
oversees the Carson Forest's firewood program. Rural Hispanics rely
on the forest for basic needs like building materials and heat, he
points out.
Schiff admits shortages exist in
certain areas, but he says the Fish and Wildlife Service found the
forest's firewood program to be sustainable. He blames the
court-ordered regulations for exacerbating
them.
Local Hispanics say the new firewood
restrictions are another attempt by outsiders to tell them how they
can use their ancestral lands. Max Cordova says he has long sought
a voice in decisions affecting the forest, and while "we used to
have to contend with one boss ... ow we have two."
* Dustin Solberg,
HCN
intern






