Secretly funded Montana sportsmen dive into political fray

  • A scene from "Rehberg's Land Grab," an ad by Montana Hunters and Anglers Action, says Homeland Security would gain "complete control" and Montanans would "have no say, if Rehberg gets his way."

    Montana Hunters and Anglers Action
  • Land Tawney, with daughter Cidney, on a Missoula hiking trail.

    Gabriel Furshong

The images are arresting: An ATV stops in a sunny meadow filled with knee-high grasses. Its driver, a young woman, removes her helmet and looks directly into the camera, a strip of black duct tape stretched across her mouth. A bird hunter in full camouflage is likewise muzzled by tape, as is a fisherman on a riverbank, an older couple backed by snowy mountains, and a rancher beside horse corrals.

Meanwhile, an ominous voiceover describes House Bill 1505 –– "a plan that gives the Department of Homeland Security complete control over millions of acres of Montana public lands." It implores viewers to contact the bill's co-sponsor, Republican Dennis Rehberg, Montana's sole U.S. House representative, warning: "We'd have no say if Rehberg gets his way."

This 30-second commercial and a similar one aired for three weeks last October in and around Billings, Missoula and Kalispell, at a cost of more than $200,000. Media buys of that size are to be expected heading into a big election year: Rehberg is challenging Sen. Jon Tester, D,  in a race that could decide the Senate's balance. What is surprising, however, is who paid for the ads: Montana Hunters and Anglers Action. MHAA is a 501(c)(4), a nonprofit that, under federal law, can spend money to support or oppose candidates without disclosing its donors.

Political activism among hunters and anglers is nothing new, in Montana or nationwide. But the six-month-old MHAA exemplifies a more particular modern trend. Over the last 10 years, conservation-minded hunters and anglers have attempted to put environmental stewardship back at the center of sportsmen's political agenda. And lately, a few groups, such as MHAA, have become increasingly aggressive. Following the strategic lead of secretive entities like Crossroads GPS -- Karl Rove's conservative 501(c)(4), which uses political advertising to influence elections -- they're spending money to elect individuals who champion large-scale land and wildlife conservation, and to defeat those who don't.

"At the end of the day, these politicians like being elected," MHAA president Land Tawney remarks on an icy January day as he carries his 3-year-old daughter Cidney up a Missoula hiking trail. "If you help get a champion elected or if you beat someone based on their bad record, that's when the true power starts to come."

Tawney, 37, has a ruddy complexion and a trim orange beard. He's worked on sportsmen's issues since earning his undergraduate degree in wildlife biology from the University of Montana in 2000. As a senior manager for the National Wildlife Federation, he works primarily on reforming federal mining law.

Land's father, Phil -- a former executive director of the Montana Democratic Party -- founded the state's first political action committee for sportsmen, the Montana Hunters and Anglers PAC, about 30 years ago. When he died in 1995, the organization stagnated. But in 2009, Land began to rebuild it. In 2010, it focused on a legislative race in Billings, supporting Democratic state Rep. Kendall Van Dyk, who was challenging Republican Roy Brown for his state Senate seat. Van Dyk, former chairman of the Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Committee in the state's House of Representatives, touted his sponsorship of the state's 2009 stream-access law, which clarifies the public's right to access streams passing through private property from public bridges. Brown, a former petroleum engineer, ran on his business credentials, but struggled to shake his oil-industry connections, which hamstrung his 2008 gubernatorial bid. Tawney's PAC paid for one TV ad and several mailers, including an oversized postcard that depicted Van Dyk posing at river's edge with a freshly caught fish. The other side showed a poodle wearing a Brown banner beneath the words: "Roy Brown: That Dog Don't Hunt." Other PACs and donors jumped in as well, and the contest became the most expensive legislative race in state history, with over $200,000 spent. Van Dyk won in a recount by just four votes.

Van Dyk, now vice president of the MHAA, says the race's momentum carried into the 2011 legislative session. The stream-access law, which is popular with anglers, was challenged by a bill that passed the House and faced a hearing in the Senate. A large crowd was anticipated, so the hearing was moved to the old Supreme Court Chambers of the state capital building. "When you walked in that room, you knew what was going to happen," Van Dyk says. "Those guys were pissed." Over 300 opponents showed up, and the bill failed to move any further.

"At that point, I realized the magnitude of this constituency," he says. "We needed to have a more organized voice." A year and a half later, he and Tawney filed the paperwork for MHAA to become a 501(c)(4). Within weeks, they were running ads criticizing Rehberg. Tawney says the group will spend more on that race, but won't disclose how much or the source of the funds.

Matthew Koehler
Matthew Koehler
Dec 28, 2012 08:14 AM
This in-depth investigation reveals that we have secret, anonymous "Dark Money" groups and individuals threatening American Democracy living right here in Missoula and representing Montanans in our state house. Hopefully the Montana media, or HCN, will take this ball and run with it.

In Montana, Dark Money Helped Democrats Hold a Key Senate Seat
By Kim Barker, ProPublica[…]rats-hold-a-key-senate-seat

Snips: "And in October, weeks after forming, the dark money side of Montana Hunters and Anglers, Montana Hunters and Anglers Action!, launched its first TV ad, starring Land Tawney, the group's gap-toothed and camouflage-sporting president, who also served on the Sportsmen's Advisory Panel for Tester.....No one from Montana Hunters and Anglers returned calls for comment....Many liberal groups active in Montana, including Montana Hunters and Anglers, were connected through Hilltop Public Solutions, a Beltway consulting firm. Barrett Kaiser, a former aide to Montana's other Democratic senator, Max Baucus, is a partner at Hilltop and runs its office in Billings....Kaiser was on the board of the Montana Hunters and Anglers dark money group. Another Hilltop employee in Billings served as the treasurer for the Montana Hunters and Anglers super PAC. Hilltop partners in Washington also helped run two other dark money groups that spent money on the Montana race: the Citizens for Strength and Security Fund and the Partnership to Protect Medicare....No one from Hilltop returned calls...."

Additional information about "Montana Hunters and Anglers Action" is below.

SNIPS: "Land Tawney of Missoula, president of the newly formed group.....Tawney, a senior manager for the National Wildlife Federation , wouldn’t reveal the cost of the buy, but sources told the Lee Newspapers State Bureau that it’s between $200,000 and $250,000….In addition to Tawney, its officers include Democratic state Sen. Kendall Van Dyk of Billings; Barrett Kaiser, a Billings communications consultant and former aide to U.S. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont.; and George Cooper, a senior vice president for a Washington, D.C., lobbying firm and former news producer for CNN."
Matthew Koehler
Matthew Koehler
Dec 28, 2012 11:43 AM
FYI: Today the National Wildlife Federation and Montana Hunters and Anglers are engaging in a new round of censorship, removal of comments and banning on their social media sites (I have screen shots of the pages if anyone wants proof) in an attempt prevent the general public from knowing about their secret, anonymous, dark money ways. Yep, that's how some of these self-professed "sportsmen" groups roll....
Matthew Koehler
Matthew Koehler
Dec 31, 2012 09:14 AM
Hello: Some of you might find this interesting as it relates to the National Wildlife Federation and Montana Hunters and Anglers censoring and removing comments on their social media sites that relate to ProPublica's investigative piece "In Montana, Dark Money Helped Democrats Hold a Key Senate Seat."

As anyone can clearly see, if you simply highlight this article, Montana Hunters and Anglers will censor and remove your comments and forever ban you from commenting again. Why do you think that is? SOURCE:[…]/mt_hunters_anglers_censored.png.

However, if you want to go onto the Montana Hunters and Anglers social media sites and use this type of language, Montana Hunters and Anglers will do absolutely nothing to censor and remove this type of language or ban a future commenter: "Burns was a worthless f#%k whose first campaign was financed corruptly, he wh*&ed himself....he was a s*&t-kickin' inbred racist scum." Or this: "The problem is we keep a lying jac&^ss like Tester...I can hear those lying piece of crap bubble head bleach blondes now!!" Or this: "Tester should be rotting in a jail somewhere." SOURCE: http://ncfp.files.wordpress[…]_anglers_not_censored1.png.

Yep, this is the same type of censorship, removal of substantive comments and banning that we've witnessed for a few years now from those in Montana who are supporting Quid Pro Quo Wilderness. Groups such as Montana Hunters and Anglers, Montana Wilderness Association (Ironically, the author of this piece Gabe Furshong, censored me through his job at MWA), Sportsmen for Montana, Hellgate Hunters and Anglers, the National Wildlife Federation and others see nothing wrong with engaging in censorship to further their agenda. What does their censorship (and secret, Dark Money ways) really say about them, or the agenda they are pushing?