You are here: home   Issues   Hydrofracked?   Not just wolf whiplash
Topic: Flora & Fauna     Department: Letters

Not just wolf whiplash

Document Actions

I, a former advocate for wolf re-introduction, am suffering a severe case of wolf whiplash (HCN, 5/30/11). It's sad, considering how much time, money and effort I have invested in wildlife and habitat conservation.
I have lost all trust in those who live by the courts, and have no tolerance for groups who know lawyers provide more profits than biologists. They disregard the information from trained wildlife professionals, fearing it will damn and undermine the gears of the gray wolf money machine.

I struggle to imagine that I will ever again support the reintroduction of any endangered species -- at least in this climate of court-driven management, where local tolerance is given no voice or priority. The ability for a species to survive is only as great as the respect and tolerance locals have for it. In disregarding local concerns, some groups cause more harm to wolves and other endangered species than their slanted ideologies allow them to believe.

And so we move forward. The wolf lawsuits have shifted the political landscape of hunters to a degree I could have never imagined. Hunters will never again trust those who deny the conservation models that allowed wolves to be supported on the Western landscape. We will keep an eye on the horizon, knowing some supposed wildlife advocates have become addicted to power, and will continue their attempts to derail this hunter-funded conservation miracle of the last 125 years.

Randy Newberg
Bozeman, Montana

Bruce Hemming
Bruce Hemming
Jun 23, 2011 11:55 AM
Randy great job. Most people would have accepted the wolves if the greedy wolf lovers would have stayed with the agreement. But there is way to much greed in suing the Federal Government and collecting 10's of millions of dollars. The real purpose of the wolves is clear to shut down hunting and drive Americans out of work. Un controlled wolf population will wipe the game out. scientists today think they have a better handle on how to make wolf control programs work. Kill at least 60 per cent — 80 per cent is preferable — of the animals in an area, according to the formula that most predator-control experts operate on, and you begin to see some results after several years, so long as there is suitable habitat in which the prey species can recover.

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. The death of backpacking? | Younger people don’t seem interested in this out...
  2. A graceful gazelle becomes a pest | Inrroducing an African gazelle called the oryx for...
  3. The man behind a New Mexico county's fracking ban | Last year Mora became the first county in the nati...
  4. What's killing the Yukon's salmon? | An ecological mystery in Alaska has scientists and...
  5. Plains sense | Ten years after Frank and Deborah Popper first pro...
HCN Classifieds
Subscriber Alert
More from Flora & Fauna
Of packrat poop, creosote bush and juniper-fed lamb
Mustang modification Review of 'The Horse Lover: A Cowboy's Quest to Save the Wild Mustangs.'
Are we smart enough to solve our raven problem? As ravens spread, they’re finding friends and foes in Western states.
All Flora & Fauna
 
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone