Personal tools
You are here: home   Issues   Roadless-less   A beeting
 

A beeting

Letter to the Editor - From the November 09, 2009 issue of High Country News by Carla Wise
Document Actions

Many of the most important points about the debate over genetically modified sugar beets were either glossed over or ignored in Matt Jenkins' story "Biotech beet-down" (HCN, 10/12/09).

For example, Jenkins states that Monsanto developed Roundup Ready beets a decade ago but they were put on hold due to public outrage, implying that it was public sentiment, and not regulatory issues, that kept the beet crop GMO-free. If this is so, then why, when they were quietly "deregulated" in 2005, did GMO sugar beets quickly take over?

Jenkins also leaves largely unchallenged the argument that farming with GMO crops is good for the farmer and the environment. Saying the biotech beets "couldn't arrive soon enough" for many farmers and then quoting Duane Grant on their benefits deserves a better rebuttal than a brief mention of Roundup-resistant weeds in other parts of the country.

Jenkins mentions that the Willamette Valley produces beet and chard seed that could be contaminated. However, he fails to point out that organic seed growers here stand to lose their organic certification –– and thus their livelihood –– from a single contamination event from GMO beet seed. There are no safeguards in place to isolate GMO beet-seed fields from other crops.

Carla Wise
Corvallis, Oregon

GMO beets

Posted by No to GMOs at Nov 09, 2009 03:09 PM
GMOs are probably the worst evil facing the world today, for he who controls food controls everything. Let GMOs onto your land and you are saying goodbye to your food sovereignty. Farmers will all become slaves to Big Ag. All Big Biotech cares about is Big Bucks. Don't listen to their lies about feeding the world's hungry. Right! That's why they don't allow farmers to save seeds, instead making them buy them each year. Lies also about research - there is no independent research carried out as that is stipulated in contracts with farmers.
"Invasive" and "useless" are the terms that describe GMOs.

gmo and nongmo

Posted by Mark Wright at Nov 11, 2009 01:22 AM
Kinda depends on the farmer.

Some crops are considered as somewhat easier to grow ( cover alot more acres with alot less time and fuel expended ), using mainly herbicides that gmo crops feature resistence to.

Downside is that since hybrid vigor can be lower, so can yields...sometimes as much as 20 to 30% lower on crops like soy.

Crops like corn...there's plenty of yield potential with both gmo hybrids and non gmo too.

Seems like as long as farmers want to keep paying the "tech" fees with gmo crops...then that is their choice.

Granted others will keep growing conventional crops and not pay tech fees thus stay non gmo too.

Best way to skip gmo is simply learn how to use a rotary hoe more affectively. They're as wide as most sprayers and most crops respond positively to a hoe vs negatively to most any herbicide.

Since most usa consumers do not farm, the best alternative might be to grow a garden. Because most everything in a store is now gmo related either directly or indirectly.

Heck there are even special crop revenue insurance plans for gmo crops now. So with the govt in that game too, it seems like the consumer is forced to purchase whatever is put in front of em.


Comments Most Commented Most Emailed
  1. Roadless-less | Judge Clarence Brimmer is determined to bring down...
  2. Commitment issues | White House pledges further collaboration with tri...
  3. Can't see the forest for the skyscrapers | The nation's capital gets stimulus funds to fight ...
  4. "A deeply troubled idea from the start" | Valles Caldera's experiment in public lands manage...
  5. Frack 2, Scene 1 | New York City fights drilling in its watershed, an...
  1. Roadless-less | Judge Clarence Brimmer is determined to bring down...
  2. Socialism and the West | Despite our reflexive fear of the word "socialism,...
  3. The Lost Art of Listening | Can the Arapaho language be saved from extinction?...
  4. Return of the pod man | Arizona farmer Mark Moody raises mesquite trees fo...
  5. Is the BLM practicing unsafe CX? | The Bureau of Land Management used a large number ...

JOIN THE High CountryEmail Commons

Award-winning content delivered weekly.

RSS FEEDS

Keep in touch! Find us on Facebook & Twitter
More from Mining & Agriculture
Wyoming - the Uranium State? A uranium renaissance arrives in Wyoming
Metalpalooza '09 Metals mining is making an unexpectedly dramatic comeback in the West.
Phosphate mining: a toxic tradition Simplot plans for a phosphate mine in southeast Idaho endanger a family's ranching lifestyle.
All Mining & Agriculture
 
© 2009 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | powered by Plone | site by Groundwire and Web Collective | design by our very own Ryan Foster