Who’ll clean up when the party’s over?

Land managers and industry are stepping up efforts to reclaim public lands scraped and drilled for oil and gas. Is it too little, too late?

 

AZTEC, NEW MEXICO
In the shadow of a sandstone outcrop a few miles east of this northwestern New Mexico outpost, a life-and-death struggle is playing out in the hard desert soil.

A few feet from a natural gas well known as Riddle #8S, delicate shoots of alabaster rice grass spring up from a swath of sandy loam. To the casual observer it's just another scraggly patch of bleached-out grass, but to Sherrie Landon, it's a biological triumph.

"This looks good," says Landon, a reclamation specialist with the Bureau of Land Management's Farmington, N.M., field office. "The vegetation is coming back very well."

The same can't be said for the dirt around a nearby older well, Riddle WH 3C. Here, only 50 yards away, the seeds didn't take. The lifeless, eroding hillside stands as a cruel reminder of the challenge of growing anything in the desert.

"Our level of success when it comes to re-vegetating just has to vary," says Landon, a solidly built blonde who likes to spend her weekends hunting oryx, an exotic African antelope introduced to New Mexico. "It's very challenging."

The San Juan Basin is the nation's second-largest natural gas basin. Unfortunately, the West's most productive fossil fuel basins -- the San Juan, the Powder River on the Wyoming/Montana border, Colorado's Piceance and southeastern New Mexico's Permian -- share another distinction: They are some of the harshest and most biologically stubborn environments to reclaim after drilling. If it doesn't rain, or if it rains at the wrong time, a season of work can be wasted.

Part of the challenge of healing this land is strictly biological. But another part is political and financial. As anyone who has flown over or driven through a natural gas hotspot can attest, this boom -- with its expanding networks of roads, well pads, waste ponds and pipeline corridors -- is leaving immense and ever-growing scars on the landscape. It will take as much energy and commitment to erase them as it took to create them. So far, however, reclamation has remained on the back burner, with the BLM, the industry, and even environmentalists putting most of their focus on the drilling boom itself.

But that may be starting to change. In 2005, Congress passed the National Energy Policy Act, which authorized new resources for the BLM to expedite reclamation efforts in energy hotspots. Since then, Landon and her five-member reclamation team have been on the ground ensuring that the industry cleans up as it develops new wells. To a lesser extent, they also oversee the reclamation of older well sites. Landon's team visits hundreds of sites each year -- first to talk over the reclamation plan with the gas company, then to check on the progress of the project, which is almost always carried out and paid for by the companies themselves.

Six other BLM "pilot" reclamation teams have formed under the new law, based in Carlsbad, N.M., Vernal, Utah, Glenwood Springs, Colo., Rawlins, Wyo., Buffalo, Wyo., and Miles City, Mont. Agency officials say the federal government's strengthened commitment to reclamation has fostered a cooperative new attitude in the energy industry. Reclamation has gone from an often-neglected afterthought to part of the standard way of doing business.

"One day these fields will have produced everything they can, and what will be there is the land and the wildlife," says Tony Herrell, deputy director of BLM's New Mexico state office. "So we need to return them to where they were before."

But successfully reclaiming oil and gas fields in the West will take a whole lot more money and personnel than are currently deployed. One observer likens the BLM's efforts to a Band-Aid on a gunshot wound. If the federal government wants to avoid the kind of scars that still linger from long-ago mining and logging, it will have to scale up its work, and do so in a hurry.

Dean Nyffeler
Dean Nyffeler Subscriber
Jan 05, 2014 10:26 AM
Here is rest of the story. The Bureau of Land Management brings in big money to the Treasury of the United States. The royalty is split between the state where the land is located BUt NONE OF THAT MONEY IS GIVEN TO BLM. It is paid to the Minerals Management Service the governments mineral royalty collectors. They turn it over to the Treasury of the United States. That money is comingled with our income taxes, our social security taxes, our FICA and any fees that are paid into the Treasury. The Treasurer reports to the President and the Congress what is in the Treasury, checking account, of the United States that fiscal year for them to spend.
You have all read about the Budget of the United States that is proposed by the President and then disposed by the Congress, most year. Part of that money is disbursed back to BLM. The way some of that comingled money gets back to a field office in BLM is the rest of the story. BLM gets a portion of the money allotted to the Department of Interior. The Secretary of Interior is charged with passing out the money to the Agencies within Interior. He doesn't do it, his budget staff does. They must divvy fund all the Interior Agencies. The infighting can be brutal because these are some of the agencies trying to get their share, USGS which now includes the biological survey, MMS onshore, MMS offshore, National Park Service, Bureau of Indian affairs, Bureau of Reclamation, and a many small entities overseen by Interior. Notice I did not say fair share. If your parents didn't tell you, life is not fair and neither is government budgeting. BLM gets some amount of money to run for the next fiscal year, October 1 to September 30. BLM first pays the salaries of all the permanent civil service employees, temporary employees and the political appointees of the administration.(schedule C) Washington makes sure its employees get paid first, then the BLM State Office, and finally the field office. What is left over of the money allotted at each level goes for capital outlays, computers, telephones, pens, paper etc.
Let's talk about whose salary gets paid first in Blm. I will give you an example one year there was not enough money for the Wilderness Program in Utah to fund its entire staff. Rather than allow the Field Office hire a new employees for field work. The Utah State Office said field office we need you to fund one of our higher paid wilderness staffers. Our Manager said sure but they will need to be in my office for the time that I am funding them. Now how many orphan wells do you think that person looked at 0. Despite the fact that minerals was bringing in large royalties and its workload was increasing, NONE of that royalty money came back to Interior, none of it came back to BLM, and none of it brought new employees, computers, vehicles or anything to alleviate the new workload. The money that was budgeted to oil and gas was spent on a high priced wilderness staffer. LIFE AIN't FAIR AND NEITHER IS GOVERNMENT BUDGETING. IMO after 33 years,25 years in field offics; Budget does not come until a crises bubbles up from the Field, to the State Office, then the Washington office of BLM, which brings to the attention of Interior, Congress, or the President. Then funding is allocated to handle the crises and employees are tasked to cure the long festering problem until it fades from attention and funding goes away, employees go elsewhere, employees retire, and the problem starts festering again.