Personal tools
You are here: home   Issues   A fractured party   Playground Politics

 

the west in your inboxEmail Newsletter

Award-winning content delivered weekly.

RSS FEEDS

Most Emailed

For Subscribers

  • Riparian repair

    River restorationists tackle the Clark Fork River near Milltown, Mont., in a project that demonstrates how hard it is to revive a damaged waterway. Subscribers only

  • An unlikely Shangri-la

    Steve and Marc Jenson have ambitious plans to turn a failed ski resort near Beaver, Utah, into a private enclave for the ultra-rich, but not everyone is thrilled about the idea. Subscribers only

  • Crash of the cottonwoods

    Across the West, cottonwoods are dying, and no one is sure how to save these iconic trees. Subscribers only

  • Going to the gasroots

    In western Colorado, oil and gas companies mobilize in a publicity blitz to pack a Grand Junction hearing about proposed changes to the state’s natural gas drilling rules. Subscribers only

 

Playground Politics

Letter to the Editor - From the July 21, 2008 issue of High Country News by Ani Kame’enui

After reading Matt Jenkins' article, I looked back at HCN's tag line: "For people who care about the West," and wondered what this means in the context of the so-called "ceasefire" in the Klamath (HCN, 6/23/08). Turns out caring for the West and the invaluable ecosystems in the Klamath is tough, especially if your cares include egrets, river flows or wetland restoration.

Jenkins characterizes the recent events in the Klamath as a ceasefire, but ongoing dialogue among interest groups in the basin hardly reflects a ceasefire. In fact, some might argue that the settlement agreement has caused nothing but unnecessary fractures between communities that have had long relationships on the Klamath.

The Klamath experience as the product of "perpetual negotiation" is entirely misleading. The settlement is the result of sweetheart deals and Bush administration propaganda, with a hope for fisheries restoration. Furthermore, it is the product of playground politics -- if you disagree, there's no room for negotiation, you're simply kicked off the team.

Though Jenkins acknowledges the settlement is nowhere near done, what he neglects to mention are the potential pitfalls, those concerns raised by groups like Oregon Wild and WaterWatch of Oregon (kicked off the team), and even some groups still in the room (Northcoast Environmental Center). Sadly, this peaceful settlement allows for continued chemical-intensive commercial agriculture on over 22,000 acres of National Wildlife Refuge land for at least 50 years, does not provide river flows for fish that meet the basin's best available science, lacks a comprehensive drought plan, and eliminates opportunities for water quality improvement by constraining upper basin wetland restoration.

The Klamath Basin battle for water requires compromise from all to create a holistic solution that manages for fish and wildlife success while bringing water demand back into balance with what the basin can naturally provide.

Ani Kame'enui
Klamath Campaign Coordinator, Oregon Wild
Portland, Oregon

© 2008 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | powered by Plone | site by ONE/Northwest and Web Collective | design by our very own Ryan Foster