Personal tools
You are here: home   Issues   A fractured party   A pitched battle on the Klamath
 

the west in your inboxEmail Newsletter

Award-winning content delivered weekly.

RSS FEEDS

More from Water
Dam deal advances Bush's Klamath River agenda Will salmon advocates win the battle for dam removal but lose the Klamath salmon war?
Water Banks, the ESA and the Public Trust Doctrine A complex subject with vast implications for the West’s future.
Liquid assets California is enthusiastic about creating “water banks” to help the state’s cities weather future droughts.
All Water

Most Emailed

For Subscribers

  • Burning issues

    Controversial forestry scientist Tom Bonnicksen believes increased logging is necessary to fight global warming. Subscribers only

  • Still Howling Wolf

    Ranchers and environmentalists in Wyoming are still squabbling over wolves as the animal bounces on and off the endangered species list. Subscribers only

  • Liquid assets

    California is enthusiastic about creating “water banks” to help the state’s cities weather future droughts. Subscribers only

  • Field Day

    In some Western states, including Colorado, prison inmates are taking the place of immigrant farmworkers. Subscribers only

 

A pitched battle on the Klamath

Letter to the Editor - From the July 21, 2008 issue of High Country News by Malena Marvin Outreach and Science Director

It's refreshing to read an account of our situation on the Klamath that takes the time to tell a complicated but ultimately entertaining and gratifying story (HCN, 6/23/08). As an outreach director for a small nonprofit, my job involves informing the public about what's happening on the Klamath and what they can do to help restore it. Articles like Matt Jenkins' "Peace on the Klamath" make my job a lot easier, by going beyond the outdated sound bites that have dominated the "Klamath crisis" to tell a multi-sided story that people can relate to.

However, there is another chapter to the story in dire need of emphasis. While irrigators, tribes and willing environmentalists made great strides toward "peace" on the Klamath, PacifiCorp still operates from a battle mentality. Though state and federal economic studies have shown that removing PacifiCorp's dams will be far cheaper than doing the fish-passage upgrades needed to get the dams re-licensed, PacifiCorp still obstinately refuses to discuss dam removal, and instead repeatedly spreads the erroneous implication that dam removal will cost its ratepayers more money. It simply will not, and the news media need to amplify this fact.

Meanwhile, PacifiCorp's reservoirs are breeding late-summer blooms of toxic algae that have been measured at 4,000 times what the World Health Organization considers a moderate risk to human health. This algae not only shuts down 190 miles of the river to recreational contact during sport and ceremonial fishing periods, it is also documented as a toxic threat in the flesh of reservoir gamefish and mussels. A representative of California's Water Board recently told the press that dam removal may be the only effective way of dealing with the pollution.

We can have "peace on the Klamath" till the cows come home, but if PacifiCorp refuses to agree to the terms of the ceasefire, we still have a pitched battle going. Only this time, we've gone beyond "cowboys and Indians" into one of the true wars of the 21st century: multinational corporations perpetrating under-publicized acts of environmental injustice against rural communities and people of color.

Malena Marvin
Outreach and Science Director, Klamath Riverkeeper
Ashland, Oregon

© 2008 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | powered by Plone | site by ONE/Northwest and Web Collective | design by our very own Ryan Foster