Walking on a Wire

Los Angeles needs green power. Does it have to tear up the desert to get it?

  • Electric transmission lines near Richvale, California. DAVID R. FRAZIER/DANITA DELIMONT AGENCY/DRR.NET

  • H. David Nahai says the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power "agonize(s) all the time" about the effects of new transmission lines through the desert. KEVIN SCANLON

  • In the path of powerlines? An endangered desert tortoise. PHOTO COURTESY DONNA THOMAS, CALIFORNIA DESERT COALITION

  • An LADWP survey stake in Big Morongo. PHOTO COURTESY DONNA THOMAS, CALIFORNIA DESERT COALITION

  • April Sall is interviewed while California Desert Coalition members protest the Green Path North Route in January. PHOTO COURTESY DONNA THOMAS, CALIFORNIA DESERT COALITION

 

Page 2

By the time of Puglisi's discovery in late 2007, however, the LADWP had already submitted an application to the Bureau of Land Management for a right of way following the markers through the Big Morongo Preserve. A few months later, it petitioned the federal Department of Energy to include that route in the West-Wide Energy Corridor (WWEC), a process set forth by Congress in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to fold hundreds of energy-transportation projects into a single environmental review. The way it looked to Puglisi, the L.A. Department of Water and Power -- the same agency that 85 years ago built an aqueduct to suck the Owens River Valley dry -- was setting up for another desert land grab. "Los Angeles," Puglisi observes, "doesn't give out very much information."

More to the point, Los Angeles is in a hurry. The city needs to meet the renewable energy goals imposed by its green-minded mayor, Antonio Villaraigosa, who wants 20 percent of the city's power to come from renewable sources by 2010, and 35 percent by 2020. And it also has to catch up with the rest of California. None of the state's other utilities, from the investor-owned Southern California Edison to the public Sacramento Municipal Utility District, emit anywhere near the 13 million metric tons of carbon dioxide that LADWP does every year. And while the public utility was previously exempt from a state anti-global warming law, it may soon be subject to a statewide cap-and-trade system taxing all greenhouse gas emitters, public and private.

So the LADWP, which currently derives only eight percent of its energy from renewable sources -- up from three percent in 2006 -- has had to scramble to find green power. And the Mojave has long been a natural place to look.

"The wasteland of the desert is the goldmine of our future energy needs," writes the octogenarian energy expert S. David Freeman in his book, Winning Our Energy Independence. Freeman, who helped guide energy policy under both the Nixon and Carter administrations, ran the L.A. Department of Water and Power from 1997 to 2001. He wears cowboy hats and speaks in a Tennessean's exaggerated drawl, and retains an environmental hero's glow in Southern California, where he's now busily greening the city's soot-choked port.

The 55-year-old Nahai, by contrast, ran his own private real estate law firm before coming to the utility. He wears elegantly cut suits and delivers his words in a refined, British-inflected English. But in all the important ways, he is Freeman's philosophical heir: Next to the challenge of weaning his city off coal, all other concerns pale.

"The effects on the environment and the repercussions (of transmission) -- we agonize over it all the time," Nahai says. "But I remain convinced that those Salton Sea resources are the only fuel to replace coal. And it is in the best interest of the state and all of its citizens that we access them."

A year ago, Nahai described this as acting on behalf of the "greater good." The wording was unfortunate, echoing as it did the same utilitarian principle -- the greatest good for the greatest number -- Franklin D. Roosevelt used to justify the Owens Valley water deal. Desert residents seized on it. "Whose 'greater good' are we talking about?" gripes April Sall, who manages two preserves in the Mojave for The Wildlands Conservancy. "What about the greater good of future generations who won't have this land to enjoy?"

Anonymous
Jun 06, 2008 02:40 PM

Excellent article. The Sunrise Powerlink really is a sham geared to bring power from polluting power plants in Mexicali northward. While it's being advertised as providing power for San Diego, the ultimate goal is to go all the way to the Los Angeles market. Fortunately, there's a great alternative plan for San Diego that reduces the metro area's energy-related carbon footprint by 50%, without destructive transmission lines. It's called San Diego Smart Energy 2020 (www.sdsmartenergy.org), and it could be used as a blueprint for other cities with plenty of sun.

As for Green Path North, it just seems obvious it should go right along Interstate 10. Hesperia is far out of the way of any route from Imperial Valley to Los Angeles.

dakuaaina
dakuaaina
Jun 14, 2008 11:42 PM

Thanks for the lengthy article on the Green project to bring in geothermal to the LA power grid. You mentioned the 'other' project briefly, the Powerlink in San Diego (David Hogan was quoted), but this project has a lot of grass roots opposition, and the CPUC will issue a final ruling later this summer/early fall. The cost benefit analysis keeps being revised lower, and lower, and the power source for these massive transmission lines Sempra Energy (San Diego Gas & Electric) wants to string through Anza Borrego Desert State Park (can you believe that?!) and scenic, tourism-dependent rural San Diego County "Backcountry" towns is purported to included dirty coal plants in Mexicali, Baja California. See the feature article in the San Diego Reader on the Powerlink about two weeks ago. HCN, it'd be great if you'd task a reporter to cover the Powerlink issue, especially as the CPUC gets ready for its ruling.

Thanks, 

Concerned San Diego residents 

 

 

Anonymous
Jun 18, 2008 11:31 AM


What a great article on the Green path projects. I would like to express my thanks to April Sall, Donna Thomas and the C.D.C and everyone who has supported the fight to save our (everyone not just desert residents) desert. Because this land is to be for all of us, for the visitors that haven't seen this desert beauty, for generation to come, it needs to be here for all to see! For if we really care about this earth then we will find a way to live on this plant without the destruction of it. I believe that our decision makers (althought they would never admit to it) are all about, $$$$, power and greed. People we are in a  self-destruction mode! If every one of us doesn't make a change,(REALLL Soon!) a change to love one another and this plant that we call home. Then we all can just kiss this big green and blue plant Good-Bye, forever! So here is my 2 cents to all the higher-ups who make the decisions for the people of earth. Do the right thing for the people, the earth, your families, forget about if you'll be elected next year or if this group or that group donated a bunch of $ to your cause, forget about the $$$$ because what good is that $ going to do you when there is no more you?...............................and me!!!!!!!!!!        From: S.O.D sign designer, supporter of the Stop Green Path North project and proud onwer of a piece of this earth, Laura Harris/Robert Salyers 


powerlink
reid walters
reid walters
Sep 23, 2008 05:56 AM
I will now resubscribe to the HCN. Anza-borrego and the powerlink, to me, are the most pressing issues in the desert Southwest. This desert must be preserved.
Reid Walters