The (non)idiot’s guide to energy
Document Actions
- Email this
- Write Editor
- Print this
- Feeds
- Discuss
- Font Size: A A A
Buildings can already be designed and constructed with potential energy efficiencies of 60 percent, she notes, and solar power is likely to become cheaper than coal- or gas-fired in the near to mid-term. Once transmission lines are built, wind-generated electricity from remote locations can provide more power to the cities.
So what's holding us back? We don't act because we're not charged the full cost of burning fossil fuels, what economists call the "externalities." Those greenhouse gases and other costs to our environment need to be taken fully into account. The marketplace is imperfect, Tombari says, hindered by government regulations that tilt the playing field toward carbon sources. "Anyone who tells you there's a free market of energy is either fibbing or has been duped by the self-serving babble of the entrenched energy industries that avoid competition by barring others from market entry," she writes.
She saves her tartest observations for the electrical utilities. Their sheer size - the largest industry in the United States - and technological complexity have made them opaque to normal scrutiny. She calls upon government regulators to induce a broad change. Because utilities' earnings are based on the sale of electricity, they constantly seek to ramp up their generation of electricity - and burn yet more coal and gas. Instead, utility profits should be linked to the delivery of energy services. If it's 100 degrees in the shade, we want to be cooled, and most consumers don't really care if that's accomplished by running an electric-powered air conditioner or by tapping the earth's constant 56-degree temperature.
Tombari's tone is hopeful but also slightly angry in her call for "urgent evolution." If we have no silver bullets in our energy arsenal, she says, we have plenty of silver, maybe even platinum, buckshot. What are we waiting for?










