Although it’s great that you are talking about the housing issue, one sweeping statement — “Don’t blame water or oil for the cul de sac’s decline. Blame creative financing.” — is skirting the fact that, yes, transportation costs (and hence oil) play a key role in many people losing their homes (HCN, 4/30/07).
According to the Center for Housing Policy, for every dollar saved by moving to a house that’s affordable but away from a job, a family pays 77 cents to cover additional transportation costs (buying a car, maintenance, gas, insurance, parking). In 2005, the average Colorado family spent 29 percent of their income on housing and 29 percent on transportation. That means that a family earning $40,000 a year spent $23,200 on housing and transportation.
Transportation costs do play a key role in housing, and in this crisis, people are losing housing. If you have to drive 50 miles a day for work because the housing you could afford was out there in the suburbs, you don’t get much of a choice. Oil plays a role and — at $3 a gallon — even more so.
> Erie, Colorado
- Latest: California fracking companies inject protected aquifers with wastewater
- American Indian students in Utah face harsh discipline
- The taxpayer money that fuels federal land transfer demands
- Obama's preemptive strike to reform Endangered Species Act
- Wyoming trespass law is the latest in grazing battle
- Bette Korber on The Los Angeles wetland wars
- Garrett Allen on The view from 31,000 feet: A philosopher looks at fracking
- Robb Cadwell on The view from 31,000 feet: A philosopher looks at fracking
- Amy & Chris Gulick on The view from 31,000 feet: A philosopher looks at fracking
- Richard H Ernst on The taxpayer money that fuels federal land transfer demands