CHINLE, Ariz. - The experts were getting testy. They
had inhaled clouds of red dust during endless drives across the
Navajo Nation. The summer heat had vaulted above 100 degrees just
about every day since they had arrived. They'd waited through
sweaty, gritty delays as their convoy of trucks crawled across the
desert floor.
But it wasn't the harsh conditions
that were bothering them. These experts in hands-on skills like
breeding sheep and installing irrigation systems were upset because
they didn't know why they were here. They had followed Utah State
University Professor Lyle McNeal all over the reservation,
allegedly to help Navajos raise their sheep in a sustainable way.
But instead of imparting their skills and giving advice, they had
spent most of their time leaning against corral fences, chatting.
McNeal, a professor of sheep and wool science at Utah State, had
introduced them to Navajo families and engaged them in
conversations about everything except the problems they had
traveled here from their universities to solve.
But as the trip wore on, the experts started to
relax. They began to realize McNeal didn't want the Anglo
specialists to spoon-feed information to the tribal sheep
producers; he wanted the project to be a truly joint venture. For
that to happen, the scientists had to get to know the
Navajos.
Kathy Williams, a textile and home
business specialist from Colorado State University, was among the
first to catch on:
"I want input from the
families," she said. "I have suggestions, but they need to show me
how to proceed. They are the experts, after all, on Navajo
agriculture."
The plight of
the Churro
Lyle McNeal is used to going against
the grain. One of the land-grant university system's most decorated
teachers, he is also one of its most outspoken critics. He is a
Mormon convert who shies away from the racism that can be found in
his culture, his adopted state and the academic world. He and his
wife, Nancy, have eight children, but they also have a Navajo
foster daughter and an extended family of Navajo friends they have
known for 20 years. McNeal's most concrete achievement is perhaps
the increasing number of Churro sheep - the Navajos' most cherished
breed - on the reservation. McNeal, whom the Navajos have called
"the blue-eyed warrior," has played a pivotal role in saving the
Churro from extinction.
The 52-year-old McNeal's
personal history reads like something out of Lonesome Dove. He is
the grandson of a wrangler in Buffalo Bill Cody's Wild West Show
and the son of a pioneer aviator. He has lived on or near Indian
reservations all his life, first in California, then in Minnesota,
Montana, Nevada and Utah. But it wasn't until 1977, when he took a
sabbatical year away from his job teaching animal science at
California Polytechnic State University, that he took a close look
at sheep operations in the Navajo Nation. McNeal, who had ranched
sheep in Nevada in the mid-1960s, felt a kinship with the tribe
because "the Navajo raise sheep and that's my thing."
The dismal state of the tribal sheep industry
surprised him. During his stay, he assisted at shearing centers and
saw how poorly the wool was harvested and marketed. He noted that
Native American sheep producers used hardly any of the technologies
employed by their Anglo counterparts.
But he
also learned something that would change his life. He had been
taught that the Churro was an "unimproved" breed that should be
allowed to die out before it contaminated the more lucrative breeds
favored by modern agriculture. Instead, McNeal came to see the
Churro through Navajo eyes. He saw that the breed was to the Navajo
what the horse was to the plains Indians: a key part of the tribe's
culture.
Brought to the Americas in the 1500s by
Spanish explorers, the Churro proved a perfect fit for the harsh
climate of the Navajo territory. They were disease resistant and
could survive on marginal food sources. They produced abundant milk
and tasty meat. They had a strong maternal instinct and a high lamb
survival rate. The Navajos raised the sheep for food and found
their long, coarse, nearly greaseless wool ideal for hand weaving.
Weaving rugs and tapestries was an integral part of tribal culture:
Navajo lore has it that they were taught the skill by the divine
Spider Woman.
The colonization of the West
nearly destroyed the Churro. By the mid-1800s, the scruffy Churro,
along with the Navajos, were battling the U.S. government for their
very existence. As Anglos pressed westward, the Navajos were
incarcerated at Bosque Redondo in New Mexico; much of their
predominantly Churro herd was systematically
destroyed.
When the Navajos were released onto
the reservation five years later, they found the government had
crossbred their Churros - whose wool grows up to 18 inches in
length - with Merino and Rambouillet stock, whose wool was less
than three inches long. The short fleeces of the offspring were
nearly worthless to Navajo weavers. They mixed it with fibers from
Angora goat fleeces, which grow up to a foot long, to make it
workable.
In the 1930s, the Churro came under
attack again. This time the government cited overgrazing and soil
erosion as reasons for a drastic stock reduction program. All
breeds were reduced, but the Churro, whose wool was considered
worthless on the mass market, was particularly hard-hit. By the
late 1970s, it was estimated that less than 500 Churro remained
among a reservation sheep population numbering
300,000.
The "blue-eyed
warrior" of the land-grant system
Then Lyle
McNeal arrived on the scene.
"I asked myself why
no one was doing anything about the Churro when we were spending so
much to save snails (and) little worms and bugs, which I know are
important for diversity," he says. "But the Churro is an
economically important animal and sacred to the Navajo."
McNeal sought out a few remaining purebreds in
central California, and in 1978 launched the Navajo Sheep Project
with a breeding herd of six ewes and two four-horned rams. After 16
years, he has helped increase the number of Churro on the
reservation from about 400 to 800. He maintains a breeding herd of
300.
"They're very hardy, very athletic," says
McNeal. "I think they're beautiful."
At first,
Utah State supported McNeal's work. He had been lured there from
Cal Poly in 1979 by the university's proximity to the Navajo
reservation and by an academic, extension and teaching tradition
that valued family agriculture. The university provided pasture for
his small flock, a truck, and money for fuel for his trips to the
reservation.
Those were what McNeal refers to as
the good old days. They faded fast in the mid-1980s when his
supervisor in the ag school changed. He began to hear murmurings
that he was wasting his time with the small producers on the
reservation. This baffled him. McNeal and his wife, Nancy, who
works closely with him at the project, suspect prejudice against
Native Americans among some university officials and jealousy from
colleagues who resented the attention the media directed to the
sheep project, ranging from Newsweek and Smithsonian magazines to
the Today Show.
"There are people (on campus)
who think you've sold your soul if you work with the Indians," says
McNeal. "It's a real caste system ... Education has taught me that
prejudice presides with the educated."
In 1986,
Utah State administrators stopped providing facilities for the
flock and transportation costs for McNeal's trips to the
reservation. Later, the university provided some land for the
flock, but the McNeals and Lyle's students had to raise funds to
construct barns, corrals and an office. Another blow was dealt in
1989 when the university gave the sheep project a scant two weeks
to come up with funding to cover one-quarter of Lyle's salary, the
time they calculated he was spending on the Churro. If he chose to
stay on full-time salary, the Navajo Sheep Project would be shut
down.
That wasn't necessary. Financial help came
from a benefactor in New York City. John Ernst, a well-known
collector of old Navajo textiles and a supporter of the Churro
project, saved its skin in the face of the 1989 ultimatum. The
president of Bloomingdale Properties and the head of the sheep
project's Advisory Council, Ernst is still a major funder of the
project. But he credits its survival to McNeal's
tenacity.
"Lyle goes his own way," says Ernst. "I
like that about him and if he weren't that way, the Navajo Sheep
Project would have ended long ago ... it's not something that goes
over too well in the bureaucracy of academia."
McNeal's skill as a teacher is undeniable. Last
fall the National Association of Land Grant Colleges and State
Universities, in conjunction with the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, awarded McNeal the Western Region's Excellence in
Teaching Award. Weldon Sleight, associate dean of the College of
Agriculture at Utah State, nominated McNeal for the
award.
Sleight is acutely aware of of McNeal's
criticism of the university.
"Lyle McNeal is
very important to me personally and to this university," says
Sleight. "We love him; the problem is we don't have enough money to
do what we want to do."
Sleight denies that
there is racism on campus, and attributes McNeal's funding problems
to shrinking research budgets, not university politics. He says it
boils down to simple mathematics: As more and more agricultural
research funds are earmarked for biotechnology and other lab-based
research, less money can be found to support small, on-the-ground
projects. A few hundred Churro sheep - most of which reside in the
parts of the reservation in New Mexico or Arizona - don't begin to
compare economically to the Utah's burgeoning dairy industry or its
large beef herds.
"The Churro project is
important for the Navajo heritage," said Sleight. "But how
important is it to Utah? ... You put your resources where the
demand is. People can say you're looking at economic factors and
not social factors, and they could be right."
Sitting in his office at Utah State, behind a door that reads "What
is popular isn't always right; what is right isn't always popular,"
McNeal argues that money shouldn't always have the last word.
"Diversity is important," he says. "My primary
concern is the value to the Navajo and Hispanic cultures. It was
the sheep industry that built the early communities of the
Southwest. It wasn't cattle; it was sheep. To many they're no
longer valuable, so it's like, "Let them go extinct."
"
All our eggs in one
basket
McNeal argues that the Churro is
genetically as well as culturally valuable. While other sheep
breeds need to be pumped full of worming agents to keep them free
of intestinal parasites, McNeal hasn't treated the Churro for worms
in the 17 years he's worked with them. Ditto for foot rot. And
their meat is lean.
McNeal isn't alone in wanting
to preserve the biological diversity of livestock. Don Bixby, a
veterinarian who directs the North Carolina-based American
Livestock Breeds Conservancy, points out that 70 percent of the
sheep in this country belong to four dominant
breeds.
"We're putting all our eggs in one
basket," says Bixby.
Bixby says that the dominant
agricultural approach, which is supported by research at land-grant
universities, has given the nation breeds that produce lots of meat
and eggs. But it also negative side effects: Turkeys have become so
heavy-breasted they can't lift themselves to mate; now they have to
be artificially inseminated. Belgian Blue cattle nearly always have
to deliver their calves by Caesarian section; black-faced sheep
varieties produce lambs increasingly plagued by neurological
disorders.
"We choose what we consider to be the
best attributes," says Bixby. "Every time you make a selection, you
also make a rejection. What we select is intentional; what we
reject is unintentional. Over the long run, we've lost many
characteristics that might be valuable in a changing agricultural
scene."
McNeal insists that the mission of the
land-grant universities, as established in the 1862 Morrill Act, is
to help small producers. The 1982 Morrill Act established the land
grants to "promote a sound and prosperous agriculture and rural
life" and to "establish and maintain a permanent agriculture"
through teaching, research and service. The land-grant university
model worked, he says, until the late 1960s, when large
corporations started dominating agriculture and providing funds for
research.
McNeal still remembers the advice he
received from a livestock extension specialist while he was
teaching at Utah State in the early 1980s: Ignore the small
producers and concentrate on the big corporate ones.
"That disturbs me," says McNeal. "I didn't come
from a big ranch and most of my students didn't come from big
ranches. I wasn't going to sell my soul to corporate agriculture. I
think this country's moral fiber was built on small farms and
ranches by men and women, not by corporations."
McNeal says his work with the Navajo has so
poisoned his relationship with the university power structure so
that he can no longer get funding to work with any sheep producers.
"My allegiance is not just to the Navajo, but to the ranchers and
farmers that live on the land," he says. "I'd apply for grants; I'd
be denied funding. In 1990 or 1991 I said, "To hell with it, I've
got enough to do and I'm not going to play this game any more."
In the midst of this financial desert, McNeal
found an oasis. Last fall he received a $100,000 federal grant (see
accompanying story). The two-year project aims to show that raising
all varieties of sheep on the reservation can be sustainable. The
pilot project is primarily for demonstration purposes, but its
implications could be huge: Nearly half of the reservation's
212,000 people are involved in raising sheep, and there are at
least 20,000 active weavers there.
In this new
project, like the 16-year-old Navajo Sheep Project, McNeal's goal
is ambitious: to reverse centuries of destruction done to Navajo
culture.
"Deep down, my message is cultural
preservation, and the sheep is a tool to do that," he says. "I'd
like to see the Navajo stay home, raise sheep and weave and make
more money than they they would working for GM making wiring
harnesses or something." n
For
more information contact the Navajo Sheep Project, Utah State
University, Logan, UT 84322-4850 (801/753-7950), or the American
Livestock Breeds Conservancy, Box 477, Pittsboro, NC 27312
(919/542-5704).
Emily Chewning
contributed to this
report.






