SANTA FE, New Mexico — Driving through the
thickly forested mountains around New Mexico’s state capital,
Mark Sardella doesn’t daydream about his next camping trip.
Instead, he thinks about the untapped heat locked up in all those
trees.
For Sardella, an engineer who moved to Santa Fe in
1996, finding homegrown heating solutions has been a mission since
2003, when he founded a nonprofit called Local Energy. At the top
of his group’s agenda is biomass energy — the
conversion of wood fiber and other organic materials into heat.
So far, Local Energy has developed small demonstration
biomass-heating projects at Santa Fe Community College and at the
nearby Santa Clara Pueblo. But Sardella has bigger plans. With the
help of a $1.3 million grant from the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Local Energy did a study showing how downtown Santa Fe
could be centrally heated from a clean and efficient biomass plant.
The study concluded that it would take about 20,000 tons
of biomass to heat downtown Santa Fe for a year. More than that is
currently available in the form of construction debris, waste from
small sawmills, and thinning slash from nearby forests — much
of it waste that people pay to discard at the landfill, Sardella
says.
"By using (millwaste and slash), you put the
dollars in low-income rural communities and keep them there. And
there’s a 400-year cultural tradition here of working in the
forest and using materials from it, so it’s cultural
preservation at the same time."
However, heating between
500 and 600 businesses and homes in downtown Santa Fe would require
a significant investment in boiler and piping equipment —
Sardella estimates the cost at about $23 million. Although natural
gas prices are rising, it’s an open question whether
businesses or city government can be persuaded to pay that kind of
money.
Using wood for energy production is hardly a new
idea: Much of downtown Flagstaff, Ariz., was centrally heated in
the early 20th century by steam produced from burning a local
sawmill’s scrap. The University of Idaho has been centrally
heating its Moscow campus for 20 years by burning waste from local
mills. A federal program, Fuels for Schools, subsidizes schools
that install biomass boilers, mainly in the Northern Rockies; one
of the schools, in Darby, Mont., reported saving $90,000 in heating
oil costs during the last school year. Modern biomass burners, some
of which are designed to generate electricity, can burn as cleanly
as those that use natural gas.
Making the process work
economically, though, is tricky. Wood is bulky, heavy and expensive
to transport, so it generally has to be used near the place it was
produced — no easy feat in a rugged, expansive state like New
Mexico. It also has to compete with the familiar convenience of
natural gas. Finally, using it on a scale larger than a simple home
woodstove requires investment in new infrastructure, such as wood
chippers, boilers, and piping.
"It’s still more
expensive to harvest the stuff than cut it down and leave it in the
woods," says Jerry Payne, an Albuquerque-based bioenergy specialist
for the Forest Service.
Yet Payne has seen a growing
number of projects on the drawing board. Western Water and Power
Production recently inked a deal to sell the electricity from a
proposed 35-megawatt biomass plant to PNM, New Mexico’s
largest electric utility. The plant would be built east of the
Manzano Mountains in the central part of the state and begin
operation in 2009, consuming about a thousand tons of wood biomass
a day to produce enough electricity for about 25,000 homes.
Most of that fuel would come from forest-thinning
projects on state and private land, but the company expects to
acquire up to a quarter of its supply from Cibola National Forest,
which makes some environmentalists nervous. "Creating an entirely
new market force on public lands is not something we look forward
to," says Bryan Bird of Forest Guardians. "It’s going to be a
voracious monster that needs to be fed."
Todd Schulke of
the Center for Biological Diversity also has reservations about the
proposed plant, largely because it would use primarily piñon
and juniper trees. The ecology of piñon-juniper woodlands is
not as well understood as ponderosa pine forests, which are
generally agreed to be overgrown with small trees. Yet Schulke
believes that New Mexico’s biggest forest-health problem
— too many trees — could be eased, at least for a few
decades, by cutting trees for energy. "We have a big job in front
of us — there’s tons of wood available," says Schulke.
"But wood isn’t really a renewable resource in the Southwest.
I see this as a one-shot deal."
New tools are available
to assess wood supply. In northern New Mexico, the ForestERA
program, run by biologists from Northern Arizona University, is
analyzing conditions across 6 million acres in order to determine
restoration priorities. That may help planners figure out what a
truly sustainable wood harvest looks like.
For now,
though, even apparently simple biomass projects can be hard to
carry out. In southwest New Mexico, it has taken three years of
pressure and about $750,000 in state funding to near the goal of
installing a wood-heating boiler at Fort Bayard, a state hospital
outside Silver City. That boiler should provide Gila WoodNet, a
nonprofit that conducts forest thinning and economic development
work in the area, with a vital new market. Burning an estimated
3,000 tons of wood chips a year instead of natural gas should pay
for the installation of the new boiler within about seven years,
Payne says.
That’s a nice savings, says Gila
WoodNet’s Gordon West, but what’s most important to the
community is that "the state will spend that money in Grant County
rather than paying it out to some company elsewhere." West says his
group’s biggest challenge now is developing the economic
infrastructure — from supplying the trees, to drying the wood
to financing — to feed a biomass plant. "There are about 10
fronts you have to develop, and you have to work on all of them at
once."
In the end, state — and eventually federal
— initiatives will likely be needed to make biomass a viable
energy source. New Mexico law requires the state’s utilities
to produce at least 10 percent of the electricity they sell from
renewable sources by 2011, and biomass could be a part of that mix.
Mark Sardella says biomass will eventually compete very
well against traditional sources, such as natural gas. "Call your
natural gas supplier and ask if you can lock in your current rate
for even five years — you can’t do it," Sardella says.
"Sure, there is risk in spending millions on new energy
infrastructure, but you have to weigh that against the real risk of
going bankrupt if you don’t change."
The Forest
Service’s Jerry Payne has a useful metaphor for the
challenge: "Using wood biomass is almost like the Wal-Mart effect,"
he says. "No, we’re not going to make a lot of money, but
there’s a lot of product out there."
Biomass: What to do with all that wood
Document Actions
- Tip Jar
- Email this
- Write Editor
- Print this
- Feeds
- Discuss
- Font Size: A A A
del.icio.us
Digg
StumbleUpon





Not a good idea
I think this is a terrible idea. What happens when the forest grows back and you have built an expensive infrastructure? Are people going to give up their jobs and convert to yet another expensive energy switchover? Unlikely. More likely they will push to continue to log the nutrients out of the forest, hurting our environment more. How is that sustainable? Biomass creates greenhouse gasses just like oil and gas, and in addition it removes carbon sinks - trees - in the long run.
My two cents.