California, here we come
Document Actions
- Share this:
- Like
- Tweet
- Tip Jar
- Print this
- Comments (2)
It’s not that I couldn’t sympathize with the locals’ viewpoint: The Californians pouring into the Interior West were driving up real estate prices, clogging the roads and changing the small-town culture. But the knee-jerk reaction against all things Californian seemed misguided, a convenient way to avoid looking at the whole picture. After all, the Golden State has also had positive impacts on the Rocky Mountain region.
Take water, for instance. Over the years, California, like other Western states, has ruthlessly pursued fresh water supplies, even when doing so dried up valleys, destroyed lakes and bulldozed the water rights of rural communities. But today, California is showing the rest of the West how to use water more efficiently through conservation; L.A. residents use far less water than the people of Phoenix, for example. And the state has pioneered the transfer of water rights from rural areas to rapidly growing urban centers.
California has also long been a leader in air-quality protection and the development of alternative energy sources, including wind and solar power. The state’s decision in the 1970s to implement tough air-quality standards forced car manufacturers to make cleaner vehicles. The brown clouds of pollution that shroud Denver and Salt Lake, especially in the winter, would be much browner — and much more dangerous — without California’s work in this area.
And as Ray Ring notes in a sidebar to his cover story, California has become a valuable ally to citizens fighting dozens of proposed coal-fired power plants in Idaho and elsewhere in the West. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s recent announcement that California will no longer purchase electricity from power plants that contribute to global warming has taken away a huge market for speculative coal-fired power plants, such as the one proposed by Sempra in Idaho’s Magic Valley. It’s likely no coincidence that, just as Idaho’s Legislature put a moratorium on the construction of new coal-fired plants, Sempra announced that it was getting out of the coal-fired power business altogether and focusing on cleaner-burning gas projects. Strong-willed citizens backed by an unfriendly marketplace make a formidable opponent.
Ring’s story shows that California’s efforts to protect the environment are more than just West Coast idealism. In actuality, they are quite pragmatic. The state — and the West as a whole — simply must innovate if it is going to accommodate a growing population without destroying its natural wealth. The uprising in Idaho shows that the West is shedding the old notion that hands-off government and unfettered industry are more important than the health of our land, air, water and communities.
Sound like the kind of thing a Californian might say? Maybe so. But maybe that’s not such a bad thing after all. Maybe the Rocky Mountain West has more in common with the Golden State than we like to admit.








Paul, It hardly seems polite to disagree with you when you've praised recent environmental positives here, but the truth is that California is no better off than the Rocky Mountain West with respect to the environment, or is actually worse off because of its exploding population. (Of course, there are several Californias, and the environment is valued in completely different ways in, say, the central coastal region as opposed to most of the Central Valley. Remember, please, that Richard Pombo hails from California, and he's not all that atypical of many of his Central Valley brethren.) With respect to water, in particular, California is really no more advanced than are other Western states, just differently implemented. Agriculture still uses 84 percent of the water delivered through the various federal, state, and local-district water projects in the state. Those transfers to urban areas that you praised are actually sales of the physical water. The rights remain with the agricultural water districts that sell the water. The districts own the rights to apply the water to "productive uses;" the way California law works, the districts can only keep the rights if they use them, so the contracts with urban water providers require that individual tracts be "fallowed" only a year at a time. I guess that this is a "solution," but I certainly don't see any incentives to efficient use of water in the agricultural context. As with most of the West, the federal government is deeply embedded in California water issues, and many of the most egregious water problems that we have in California result from federal policies that favor uses other than the environment. Most of those uses in Caliornia are agricultural. So we have the Westlands Water District sueing the federal government to prevent water from being released down the Trinity River to help fish, even as the West Coast salmon fishery is virtually shut down because there isn't enough water in the Klamath/Trinity basin to support enough fish to allow fishing. And we have the biggest water districts in the state (including Westlands, as well as the Metropolitan Water District, which provides wholesale water to the urban region from Ventura to San Diego) cutting a behind-closed-doors deal with federal and state water agencies to ship even more water south out of the ecologically failing Sacramento/San Joaquin River Delta. If California does have any general wisdom to offer to others in the West, it is probably that most environmental problems (related to water, timber, or public land issues in general) start from agency (mis)behavior, and the necessary ingredient in finding a pro-environment solution is citizen engagement. On the other hand, the citizens in Magic Valley already get that point, and your pages show that citizens in all the Western states understand that. California's growing population makes solving the problems more urgent, and the state is (relatively speaking) awash in money, but we don't have anything really basic working for us that isn't available to citizens on most states. So you know what, you're probably right that California has more in common with the Rocky Mountain West than we like to admit. Perhaps, however, the direction of influence should be a two-headed arrow.