At a House hearing for the legislation in late October, the Resources Committee’s ranking Democrat, Nick Rahall, spoke passionately in favor of wilderness and against the Boulder-White Clouds bill. Also testifying against the bill were wilderness activist Carole King, the BLM, the Forest Service, a cattleman’s spokesperson, and an ORV promoter. Simpson and Idaho Conservation League (ICL) director Rick Johnson were the only witnesses speaking in favor of the bill.
Finally, 37 conservation groups, including 13 in Idaho, have gone on the record against the Simpson bill because of its numerous unacceptable provisions — including land giveaways, erosion of protections in the Sawtooth NRA, and the establishment of a huge ORV-dedicated management area. Only three groups — ICL, The Wilderness Society, and Pew’s Campaign for America’s Wilderness — are supporting the legislation.
The Boulder-White Clouds proposal not only lacks "bipartisan support," it is the center of an intense discussion among conservationists about the future of wilderness and public lands.
Janine Blaeloch, Director
Western Lands Project
- dan bosch on Suckers for gold
- Tom Darnell on Will public-lands ranchers pay more for grazing?
- Alan Stevens on Private property blocks access to public lands
- Linda VanFossan on California has one year of water left: Hype or reality?
- Joseph Yannuzzi on Sportsmen’s bill aims to open inaccessible public lands