But when Brandborg tried to attend a forest press conference in Hamilton last Sept. 22, he found his way blocked by an armed, flak-vested law-enforcement officer.
The unusual face-off seemed to validate concerns that the 2003 Healthy Forests Restoration Act will undermine public involvement in agency decisions (HCN, 12/8/03: Forest Protection on the Honor System). The current forest supervisor, Dave Bull, held the press conference to release an environmental impact statement for a thinning project, the first logging in the Northern Rockies authorized by the act.
Some residents and local officials who support the agency’s plan to log about 6,500 acres were invited to the press conference. But guards prevented two other environmentalists from attending. All three of the excluded are leaders of the Friends of the Bitterroot. The group proposes logging only 1,600 acres, and says that 98 percent of the 10,000 comments on the EIS backed its plan.
Bull later apologized for excluding the critics. A forest public-affairs officer told the Missoulian newspaper, "We wanted to focus on the project’s merits."
The environmentalists are now pressing a federal lawsuit against Bull and the Bitterroot National Forest, claiming their civil rights were violated. The show of hostility tromped on "all the precepts of good government," Brandborg says. "We were three old geezers with pieces of paper and pencils."
- Phaedra Greenwood on Can Aldo Leopold’s land ethic tackle our toughest problems?
- Mary Doherty on Utah burn ban ignites outrage over ‘basic freedoms’
- Dale Lockwood on Utah burn ban ignites outrage over ‘basic freedoms’
- Joe F Whelan on Charles Bowden’s Fury
- Bill Schiffbauer on Utah burn ban ignites outrage over ‘basic freedoms’