The problem is, as you point out, that many of the oil-rig workers are jailed, because they turn to crime to support their habit. However, as your featured sheriff admits, "I’ve seen our community and other communities deal with this in the traditional way, and it’s gotten us nowhere." The "traditional way," of course, is denying people jobs and putting them in jail.
Well, supposing we just stopped enforcing the laws barring the use of meth? The United States long ago found that the prohibition of alcohol was a no-winner. Alcohol is addictive, too; driving under the influence is dangerous, and it is also associated with domestic abuse. But suppression didn’t work. Also, testing for alcohol use the night before arriving for work never kept anyone from getting a job.
If the workers feel that meth helps them, why not let them alone? The jails would empty, and the counties would save enough money to offer rehabilitation to those workers who want to get off the drug.
New York, New York
- The taxpayer money that fuels federal land transfer demands
- Latest: California fracking companies inject protected aquifers with wastewater
- Obama's preemptive strike to reform Endangered Species Act
- Wyoming trespass law is the latest in grazing battle
- Sightseeing at an open pit mine in Arizona copper country
- Bette Korber on The Los Angeles wetland wars
- Garrett Allen on The view from 31,000 feet: A philosopher looks at fracking
- Robb Cadwell on The view from 31,000 feet: A philosopher looks at fracking
- Amy & Chris Gulick on The view from 31,000 feet: A philosopher looks at fracking
- Richard H Ernst on The taxpayer money that fuels federal land transfer demands