My minuscule slice of the Colorado River
Basin’s flow dried up yesterday. When I opened the plug on
our 6-inch pipe, a trickle of brown water dribbled out, followed by
a black glob of sediment, writhing with a half-dozen crawdads. And
that was it.
The local ditch company usually stops
delivering water in mid-August, when the last dregs of the
reservoir above town drain out. This year, we made it to September.
Such liquid riches remind me of just how much water and effort we
pour onto our fields, all to grow two cuttings of hay, one of which
was spoiled this year by rain.
Growing hay or grapes or
apples is not a moneymaker for most landowners in this Colorado
valley. A few of us are bona fide farmers, but most are coal
miners, accountants, retirees — even journalists. We farm
because we like fresh vegetables or want to raise food for our
animals, and we delight in the green landscape that water creates
in this semi-desert country.
But as the West fills up
with people, and the thirst of our cities and suburbs grows, does
farming in a dry place make any sense?
Assuming that my
family’s share of the ditch yields an average of 10 gallons
of water every minute, we pour 14,400 gallons of water on our
fields every day. The average home in a Western city uses 300
gallons of water a day; if my irrigation water were potable, it
could supply 48 households for four months. And I am one of the
smallest players on a small ditch.
In an essay
High Country News published in 2000, historian
and Las Vegas booster Hal Rothman had a proposition for the rest of
the West: "Go to the ranchers and farmers and tell them we’ll
give them their best year plus annual cost-of-living raises to
match inflation, and in return they’ll give us their water."
His words were not received kindly by some of our
readers. By the same token, Las Vegas’ proposal to suck the
groundwater out from underneath the rest of the state is being met
with considerable hostility by Nevada’s rural residents. But,
as HCN Associate Editor Matt Jenkins writes in
this issue, the battle goes far beyond that: Rural Nevada has
become a pawn in a much larger fight over the Colorado River.
It’s no surprise that Nevada is at the heart of
this new water war. The state with the fastest-growing city in the
nation and the smallest share of the Colorado River is running up
against its physical and legal limits. With Nevada threatening to
shake apart the whole Colorado River Compact, the six other states
on the river are suddenly eager to help Las Vegas find water. Water
does flow toward money.
But where that water comes from,
and what impact its loss will have on the region’s fragile
ecosystems and rural communities, are complex issues that must be
weighed carefully before the West starts building more pipelines
and pumps.
I’d like to think that Las Vegas,
Phoenix, Denver and the like don’t need my little brown ditch
flow to slake their thirsts; there is plenty of waste and
inefficiency in the system from large-scale agribusiness and
lawn-watering urbanites.
But growth and drought pack a
powerful one-two punch. In the long run, small farms like mine may
be doomed. For now, though, I’ll sit back and keep my eyes on
the mountains, looking for the first snows that, next spring, will
once again turn my fields green.
del.icio.us
Digg
StumbleUpon
Yahoo
Google
Spurl
Wists
Simpy
Newsvine
Blinklist
Furl
Reddit
Fark
Blogmarks
Smarking
Magnolia
Ozmozr

