But Waldie’s statement "Welcome to the future, Westerners. It’s L.A.," implies we lack alternatives. We do not.
Why is it that — while every other developed nation has stopped growing or is losing population (Italy, Spain, Ireland) — we have one of the highest growth rates and will not allow the possibility that we should stop growing onto the radar? Have we all bought into the boom booster’s self-serving pipe dream: "We must have growth, but it’s got to be good growth"? Do we prefer this myth to confronting social choices that must be confronted eventually: Immigration at upwards of three times the frontier-era great wave and driving a population explosion that will mean a China-like one billion Americans later this century?
We would serve our nation’s future, and the environment’s — both domestic and international — by demanding immigration reduction combined with adequate funding for international family planning.
Rio Rancho, New Mexico
- Meg Scherch-Peterson on Illegal bike trails and a Forest Service crackdown divide a town
- Edward Williams on When poisoning is the solution
- Jeff Zapko on Climate showdown on the Willamette in Oregon
- Jim Brandau on When poisoning is the solution
- Michael Weeks on Deaths renew calls for national parks to rescind BASE jumping bans