The Great Salt Lake's dirty little secret

  • USGS intern Ashley Nielsen collects brine shrimp samples from the Great Salt Lake, where mercury levels are among the highest ever measured anywhere

    Jeff Salt, Great Salt Lake Keeper
 
High mercury levels may have a surprising source

 

Early this year, scientists made a startling discovery about Utah’s Great Salt Lake. The lake, it seems, isn’t just salty. It’s also loaded with mercury.

"We were all taken aback by the results," says David Naftz, the U.S. Geological Survey hydrologist who headed the survey. Water samples exceeded federal mercury thresholds, and methylmercury — the element’s most toxic form — was found in some of the highest concentrations ever measured by the Geological Survey. The lake’s brine shrimp tested above mercury thresholds, as did the eared grebes that feed on the shrimp.

Because it lacks a sport fishery, the lake had previously escaped the scrutiny that’s led to fish-consumption warnings at places like Idaho’s Lake Coeur d’Alene. Were it a freshwater lake, Naftz says, "You can bet that the Great Salt Lake would have been studied for mercury."

The lake’s brackish nature could make it a "methylmercury factory," he says. Its deep saltwater supports bacteria that convert mercury’s metallic form into methylmercury, which damages the central nervous system. That has some hunters worried about the health risks of eating ducks and geese that nosh on the mercury-laden brine shrimp.

But before it gets into the food chain, the mercury has to get into the lake. While scientists search for the mercury’s source, environmental groups are already pointing their fingers at a surprising suspect in north-central Nevada. There, they say, gold mines spew thousands of pounds of mercury into the wild.

Reeling in the mercury

In 1997, the Environmental Protection Agency inventoried the nation’s mercury sources, from coal-fired power plants all the way down to dental fillings from funeral home crematoriums. Gold mines weren’t included, though, says David Jones, associate director of waste management for the EPA’s southwest region: "We didn’t know they had mercury emissions."

But since the mid-1990s, the mining industry has used cyanide leaching and ore roasting to strip trace amounts of gold from ore. And those methods release large amounts of mercury into the atmosphere.

In 1998, the EPA started requiring mines to report mercury emissions. That year, Nevada gold mines accounted for 8 percent to 10 percent of the nation’s airborne mercury emissions, pumping an estimated 21,000 pounds into the air.

In 2001, the EPA and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection implemented a voluntary mercury-reduction program. They worked with the state’s five biggest gold mines, which account for almost all of its mining mercury: Barrick’s Goldstrike, Placer Dome’s Cortez, Queenstake’s Jerritt Canyon and Newmont’s Twin Creeks and Carlin South mines.

Rich Haddock, Barrick’s vice president of environment, says, "Our position was pretty clear: We shouldn’t have uncontrolled mercury sources." The mines installed air scrubbers, and used venting technology and chemical methods to further curb emissions.

The voluntary program, Jones says, has been as effective as a mandatory program, and faster to implement. Today, Nevada mines account for about 3.5 percent of the nation’s total mercury.

Throwing the net wider

Those reductions have not satisfied conservation and mining watchdog groups. They believe that west winds blow mercury across the region and into the Great Salt Lake’s 22,000-square-mile watershed, where it falls in rain and snow, and eventually collects in the lake, which has no outlet. Earlier this year, they readied a lawsuit to force the EPA to regulate emissions.

But scientists say there’s still no easy explanation for the Great Salt Lake’s contamination. Scant evidence links emissions from Nevada’s mines to mercury deposits in neighboring states. The element also occurs naturally, and gold mining historically relied on large amounts of imported mercury. Further confounding research is the "global mercury pool" ever-present in the earth’s atmosphere, which deposits the element indiscriminately.

Mae Gustin, an associate professor of Natural Resources and Environmental Science at the University of Nevada, Reno, says more questions about area mercury need to be answered before blaming one industry. She is beginning a yearlong analysis of atmospheric mercury depositions in Nevada, setting up two sophisticated air-sampling sites to determine just where the state’s mercury goes.

To get a better picture of historic mercury deposits, Naftz, with the U.S. Geological Survey, plans to take lake-core samples in locations ranging from Elko, Nev., to the Great Salt Lake.

Meanwhile, environmentalists have shelved their lawsuit, choosing instead to work with government agencies and mine operators to expand and bolster the voluntary program.

And gold mines seem willing to cooperate: "The net can be thrown wider," says Nevada Mining Association President Russ Fields.

Tentative plans for the voluntary program, which should be hammered out by this fall, include looking at how other industries, such as coal-fired power plants, have reduced emissions, getting more mines on board and, perhaps most critical, conducting more research on mercury pathways.

No matter what happens, it may already be too late for the lake, says Naftz: "If (the mines) are a few hundred miles upwind of the Great Salt Lake and the Great Salt Lake is a major accumulator (of mercury), some of the damage is already done."

The author is an HCN intern.

muberuaga
muberuaga
May 30, 2006 11:33 AM

The fact that the Great Salt Lake is laden with Mercury is not new news. Environmental groups in Utah have been warning about the dangerously high levels of mercury for several years now. Please contact Jeff Salt of the Great Salt Lake Keepers and ask him about his campaign to test Mercury levels in the lake. In fact, Jeff has been working to test Mercury levels in other bodies of water across the state as well. I refuse to give any federal agency credit for "discovering" the toxicity levels in the Great Salt Lake. "Too late" is a poor excuse for inaction. The source of mercury is also no big suprise. Correctly identified as coal fire power plants; the number one source of mercury in our waterways. This is not solely a Utah problem either. For more information on how mercury is affecting the rest of the country and how misguided legislation like the "clear Skies Initiative" actually increases the problem check out cleanairnow.org. That's the problem with the news, every time a truth is exposed we call it "news". Michelle Uberuaga Bozeman, MT

Anonymous
Feb 12, 2008 11:06 AM

Wow! I can't believe it.

It's good that scientists found this quickly.

Anonymous
Apr 02, 2008 04:32 PM

I think that this is all dumb who cares about the mercury levels in the lake, we should just pay more attention to where we fish and hunt and swim I guess.  So i don't even see why the news would even care about this type of thing go find something more useful to put on the news and stop waisting your time with little things like this and make your self more useful towards the more major things.

Mercury levels high in Great Salt Lake
Natalie Barlow
Natalie Barlow
Jan 28, 2010 09:52 AM
I am wondering if mercury is one of the reasons why many of the common birth defects such as Spina Bifida and Cleft Lip and palette are so high in the state of Utah. I am asking if anyone knows of any research or articles that they can refer me to, if studies in the state of Utah have been done on this.

Thanks