The 1,100 people who floated the Grand Canyon prior to the completion of Glen Canyon Dam didn’t need a corporate outfitter. And nobody needs one today. No corporation should be allowed to deny a private citizen access to a public river. Not in the Grand Canyon. Not on any river in America.
For-profit concessionaires have enjoyed the privilege of operating in our national parks when it was erroneously believed to be "necessary and appropriate for public use and enjoyment of the park," according to the National Park Service. Since there are some 8,000 individuals (representing well over 100,000 private citizens) who paid to get on a 25-year wait list in order to gain access to the Colorado River, it is clear that for-profit corporations are neither "necessary" nor "appropriate" in Grand Canyon National Park. These corporate entities are asserting that their traditional public-resource welfare benefits have become a private-property right. And they use that claim of a private-property right to deny public access to what they openly refer to as "their" river.
Mr. Smith is absolutely correct: "(T)he canyon, and the experience, are too precious to destroy." If Mr. Smith and the Grand Canyon River Guides truly want to protect this national treasure, then they should advocate first for the elimination of corporate/ motorized allocation of user days, and then for a complete elimination of all corporate-controlled boating in the Grand Canyon.
- Jim Bolen on Latest: Officials open a criminal investigation of EPA’s role in the Animas river spill
- Jim Bolen on Biking bill is a smokescreen for opening up wilderness
- Jason Brustad on Biking bill is a smokescreen for opening up wilderness
- Toby Thaler on Nuclear power divides California’s environmentalists
- Mike Sennett on Latest: Officials open a criminal investigation of EPA’s role in the Animas river spill