Cows versus condos -- Northwest style
by Lissa James
Like ranches elsewhere in the West, small tree farms
in Washington encompass some of the best fish and wildlife habitat:
lowland areas close to streams. An estimated 40,000 people
statewide own small tree farms that make up half of the
state’s 8 million acres of private forestland.
Yet
these small-scale timber operators had little say in negotiating
the Forests and Fish logging rules, says Kirk Hanson, of the
Department of Natural Resources’ Small Forest Landowner
Office, who owns a 40-acre tree farm himself. "The Forests and Fish
rules were industry-negotiated," he says. "Small forest landowners
were shoved to the side."
These landowners bear the brunt
of the Fish and Forest rules, say forestry experts. On average,
streamside buffers eat up 20 percent of the value of every timber
sale, but small landowners lose the most, because they’re
more likely to have land in valley bottoms crisscrossed with
streams. And the plan’s rules are so complicated that most
tree farmers have to hire professional foresters to fill out
cutting applications.
The proposed plan could make life
even harder, many small tree farmers argue, unless it contains
strong guarantees that timber harvesting can continue. And
what’s bad for tree farms may be bad for salmon, too. Small
landowners are under increasing pressure to sell to developers or
subdivide. According to the state Department of Natural Resources,
western Washington loses 88 acres of family forests a day —
or 50 square miles a year — to the kind of urban sprawl
that’s swallowing Puget Sound.
It’s the
Northwest’s version of the "cows versus condos" dilemma, in
which ranchers, pushed to the brink by global markets and tight
regulations, can net tremendous profits by selling their private
land to developers.
The Forests and Fish rules offer
small landowners some exemptions; they’re not required to
inventory fish-blocking culverts, for example. But those exemptions
make it more difficult for the federal government to track fish
kills and gauge the effectiveness of the rules, says Chris Mendoza,
a conservation biologist who works for both the timber industry and
environmentalists: "It’s another blank spot that makes it
difficult to quantify how much ‘take’ (killing) is
actually going on."
The state’s easement programs
help offset the costs of regulations for small forest landowners.
But convincing landowners to sign up for easements can be
difficult, especially in the face of regulatory uncertainty,
according to Peter Overton, whose family has owned a tree farm in
southern Puget Sound since 1922. Speaking at a recent meeting of
the Washington Farm Forestry Association, an advocacy group for
small forest landowners, Overton said that tree farmers don’t
want to run the risk of being "tied up in forestry (and) then
regulated out of business."
© High Country News