It's capitalism, stupid
Document Actions
del.icio.us
Digg
StumbleUpon
Yahoo
Google
Spurl
Wists
Simpy
Newsvine
Blinklist
Furl
Reddit
Fark
Blogmarks
Smarking
Magnolia
Ozmozr
At a time when the morale of the environmental
community is at such a low point, why do Ray Ring and the editor
wish to feature a story casting aspersions and fomenting factional
bickering? One is led to believe that behind every issue,
especially here in Montana where I have lived and worked as an
activist for almost 30 years, there is an obstructionist
tree-hugger thwarting consensus and peaceful resolution. The
assertion that "if environmentalists had gotten involved anytime
earlier than 1999, they could have helped start the cleanup (of
asbestos in Libby, Mont.) sooner" is akin to saying blacks were
responsible for segregation because they didn’t start the
civil rights movement soon enough (HCN, 2/21/05: Where were the
environmentalists when Libby needed them most?).
Ring is trying to achieve some sort of "balance." But there is one essential aspect of the overarching analysis which you don’t mention, and that is the macroeconomic structure that determines our social, property, class and power relations: Capitalism. It contains within its design and function inherent contradictions at the root of every environmental issue you have highlighted since your inception, and yet it remains outside the boundaries of the conversation.
At some point someone, somewhere, will have to take on the dominant narrative that says, "We can have it all — unlimited prosperity, a clean healthy environment, peace and justice for all — and it will all be painless if we will only learn to ‘compromise.’ "
David D. Jones
Hamilton, Montana
Ring is trying to achieve some sort of "balance." But there is one essential aspect of the overarching analysis which you don’t mention, and that is the macroeconomic structure that determines our social, property, class and power relations: Capitalism. It contains within its design and function inherent contradictions at the root of every environmental issue you have highlighted since your inception, and yet it remains outside the boundaries of the conversation.
At some point someone, somewhere, will have to take on the dominant narrative that says, "We can have it all — unlimited prosperity, a clean healthy environment, peace and justice for all — and it will all be painless if we will only learn to ‘compromise.’ "
David D. Jones
Hamilton, Montana
