The comment made by Gary Sprung that "cycling in the backcountry is no worse for the environment than hiking," is misleading, in my opinion. Opening up backcountry areas to mountain bikes poses many problems: What about the trails built through meadows and steep areas of highly erodable soils? What about the disturbance this activity will have on wildlife? What about conflicts with other wilderness users such as backpackers and pack stock users? Lastly, while funding for wilderness programs in all of the four agencies responsible for managing these lands continues to dwindle, what impact will this have on budgets already stretched thin?
I’ve been an avid mountain biker for 17 years. I’ve also been a wilderness ranger in northwest California for the past six seasons. With all of the modern technology at our disposal these days, people are getting deeper into remote areas that in the past were not accessible, from snowmobiles in Yellowstone National Park to OHVs in the Mojave Desert, and dirt bikes in national forests. Now mountain bikes in our wilderness areas? When do we start saying, "Enough is enough?"
- Latest: California fracking companies inject protected aquifers with wastewater
- American Indian students in Utah face harsh discipline
- The taxpayer money that fuels federal land transfer demands
- Obama's preemptive strike to reform Endangered Species Act
- Wyoming trespass law is the latest in grazing battle
- Bette Korber on The Los Angeles wetland wars
- Garrett Allen on The view from 31,000 feet: A philosopher looks at fracking
- Robb Cadwell on The view from 31,000 feet: A philosopher looks at fracking
- Amy & Chris Gulick on The view from 31,000 feet: A philosopher looks at fracking
- Richard H Ernst on The taxpayer money that fuels federal land transfer demands