In October, the Ojito proposal was tacked on to a Nevada wilderness bill and escorted through the U.S. House of Representatives by New Mexico Reps. Tom Udall, D, and Heather Wilson, R (HCN, 9/13/04: A water-and-wilderness bill kicks up dust in Nevada). But the bill stalled in the Senate when Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., who chairs the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, objected. Because of New Mexico’s water problems, Domenici said, the bill must forfeit any reserved water rights before it can pass.
But because Ojito is dry as a bone, some wilderness supporters believe Domenici is actually trying to set a precedent for future wilderness designations by using the water issue to make an uncontroversial bill controversial. "Domenici’s trying to find ways to erode the strength of the Wilderness Act," says Steve Capra, executive director of the New Mexico Wilderness Alliance. "It’s radical; there’s no other word for it."
With this year’s congressional session over, the bill is dead, and will need to be reintroduced in both the House and Senate next year.
- Harold Johnson on Latest: California’s tree die-off is bigger than you thought
- Harold Johnson on What Obama can actually do about Standing Rock
- Jim Bolen on Bears Ears: Correcting an off-base argument
- Mark Rozman on At Standing Rock, activists dig in on historic treaty land
- Dana Powers on At Standing Rock, activists dig in on historic treaty land