In October, the Ojito proposal was tacked on to a Nevada wilderness bill and escorted through the U.S. House of Representatives by New Mexico Reps. Tom Udall, D, and Heather Wilson, R (HCN, 9/13/04: A water-and-wilderness bill kicks up dust in Nevada). But the bill stalled in the Senate when Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., who chairs the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, objected. Because of New Mexico’s water problems, Domenici said, the bill must forfeit any reserved water rights before it can pass.
But because Ojito is dry as a bone, some wilderness supporters believe Domenici is actually trying to set a precedent for future wilderness designations by using the water issue to make an uncontroversial bill controversial. "Domenici’s trying to find ways to erode the strength of the Wilderness Act," says Steve Capra, executive director of the New Mexico Wilderness Alliance. "It’s radical; there’s no other word for it."
With this year’s congressional session over, the bill is dead, and will need to be reintroduced in both the House and Senate next year.
- Mark Bailey on Enough is enough at the Glen Canyon Recreation Area
- Mark Bailey on What I learned from 30 years with the Forest Service
- Tom McCarty on Enough is enough at the Glen Canyon Recreation Area
- Andrew Sipocz on The great salmon compromise
- Kyle Klain on Enough is enough at the Glen Canyon Recreation Area