Californians put their money where their meter is

  • City of San Diego Water Department technician Henrietta Crowder checks a water meter for leaks. A new state law requires all California homes to be equipped with water meters by 2025.

    Photo courtesy City of San Diego Water Department
 

California reached a conservation milestone in September, when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, R, signed a bill requiring all homes in the state to use water meters by 2025.

 

Existing California law requires water meters on all houses built since 1992, but most utilities charge a flat rate, rather than using the meters to charge by the gallon. Now, people will pay more if they use more, and utilities will have the ability to detect leaks and encourage customers to use their water wisely.

 

"Ornamental water meters are silly," says Ron Stork of the nonprofit group Friends of the River. "It’s time to get with the 20th century, now that we’re in the 21st."

 

Metering won’t be cheap, however. In Sacramento, the state capital, over 100,000 homes must be retrofitted; the cost, an estimated $300 million, will come out of the city’s pocket. Angela Anderson, a spokesperson for the Sacramento department of utilities, says the city objects to the metering mandate. Long-standing water rights guarantee the city enough water to meet present and future demands, she says, with or without such conservation measures.

 

Despite Sacramento’s complaints, it’s clear that charging people based on their water use works: Through metering and consumer conservation incentives, San Diego County has held its water use down. Residents used virtually the same amount of water in 2003 as in 1990 — despite a 16 percent population increase.

 

Crewzen
Crewzen
Jul 31, 2006 09:33 AM

The State mandates every 'household' have a water meter. Cities have to comply or lose State/Fed water. Will the counties be far behind? I use much less than most people, 'cause I don't have it to waste 6 months out of the year . I have green grass when it rains and dried stalks that are mowed down when the rain quits.

Do I believe that installing water meters might tend to decrease water useage/waste/squandering for people hooked up to water districts pipes: YES!

Will it cost a lot and create more bureacracy/governmental power & abuse of personal rights ? ...YES!

Does it make sense for land owners, that are not on a water district hookup and maintain their own water source {well}, at their own expense, for their own personal use, to be burdened with a meter that will have to be replaced/repaired frequently unless an expensive and high maintenance filter system is installed, in order for State lawmakers to say that they've 'done something' about water in order to get votes for themselves/ political party/ friends, etc.... NO!