Subsidies Strike Again
Document Actions
del.icio.us
Digg
StumbleUpon
Yahoo
Google
Spurl
Wists
Simpy
Newsvine
Blinklist
Furl
Reddit
Fark
Blogmarks
Smarking
Magnolia
Ozmozr
The feature article, "Prairie Conundrum" points out
that the federal government’s Conservation Reserve Program
(CRP) is providing incentives for farmers to convert native prairie
into crop monocultures. But the article praises another USDA/Farm
Bill program — the Environmental Quality Incentive Program
(EQIP). According to the article, EQIP claims to "pay farmers to
adopt conservation practices that improve water quality, wildlife
and irrigation efficiency." In the 2002 Farm Bill, funding for EQIP
shot up from $200 million to $1 billion.
However, judging from the special Klamath EQIP provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill, EQIP, like CRP before it, is a giveaway to farmers disguised as a conservation incentive.
Klamath EQIP was promoted as a means to provide more flow in streams and in the Klamath River by reducing irrigation demand via improvements in on-farm irrigation efficiency. The Natural Resource Conservation Service claims that Klamath EQIP has reduced irrigation demand in the Klamath River Basin by 63,377 acre-feet. This water is presumably now available to augment river flows.
But those in the conservation and ag community who have been working to increase stream flows during the critical late summer and fall salmon-migration season, say that EQIP has wiped out all the water savings they worked to achieve over the past 20 years.
There are lessens in the Klamath EQIP experience. One is that agricultural interests can turn almost any conservation program into a means to feather their own nest at the expense of the environment and the American taxpayer. Another lesson is that conservationists need to read the fine print in Farm Bill drafts and stop supporting incentives/subsidies that sound good but do bad.
Felice Pace
Klamath, California
However, judging from the special Klamath EQIP provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill, EQIP, like CRP before it, is a giveaway to farmers disguised as a conservation incentive.
Klamath EQIP was promoted as a means to provide more flow in streams and in the Klamath River by reducing irrigation demand via improvements in on-farm irrigation efficiency. The Natural Resource Conservation Service claims that Klamath EQIP has reduced irrigation demand in the Klamath River Basin by 63,377 acre-feet. This water is presumably now available to augment river flows.
But those in the conservation and ag community who have been working to increase stream flows during the critical late summer and fall salmon-migration season, say that EQIP has wiped out all the water savings they worked to achieve over the past 20 years.
There are lessens in the Klamath EQIP experience. One is that agricultural interests can turn almost any conservation program into a means to feather their own nest at the expense of the environment and the American taxpayer. Another lesson is that conservationists need to read the fine print in Farm Bill drafts and stop supporting incentives/subsidies that sound good but do bad.
Felice Pace
Klamath, California
