The Faces Behind the Lawsuits

by Ray Ring

Relentless

 

 

Johanna Wald

 

Natural Resources Defense Council, branch in San Francisco

 

Bio Viewpoint

"I have never seen the kind of assault on the environment that we are experiencing now. It is broad. It is deep. It is comprehensive. And it is relentless. ... Some cases I’ve won, I’m still having to think about 30 years later (as the same issues come up again)."

 

‘Love of place’

 

Joe Feller

 

Arizona State University law professor

 

Bio

 

Viewpoint

 

"I first grew concerned on a hike in Arch Canyon in 1988. As soon as I walked into the canyon, I said, ‘Boy, something is wrong here.’ All the vegetation was mowed down, it looked like a disaster. I was so inexperienced, at first I thought it was (the aftermath of) a fire. Then I realized it was overgrazing. I decided to make it a research project, started writing letters and asking questions, and I just became so angry, I started to raise objections. My cases always grow out of a love of a place."

 

‘Pay cut’

Laird Lucas

 

Advocates for the West, in Boise

 

Bio

 

Viewpoint

 

"I came out of law school with huge debts, and had to pay it off, so I put in seven years in private practice in San Francisco, representing corporations and wealthy individuals, white-collar defense and securities fraud. I had to look deep within myself and ask, ‘Is this the kind of law I want to practice?’ I took a 60 percent pay cut moving to Boise to do environmental law. I want to work on something I really believe in."

 

‘Imbalance’

Letty Belin

 

Private practice in Santa Fe

 

Bio

 

Viewpoint

 

"It’s disturbing to see how much money gets poured into what you could call the anti-environmental side, vs. how little money is available for people who are pursuing the public’s interest. I think, for example, of one relatively minor hearing in the silvery minnow litigation: I was (alone) representing six environmental groups, and there were 18 lawyers on the other side. Five different parties, at least 18 lawyers — for the city of Albuquerque, the state, the federal agencies, the irrigators — and there was me. That imbalance is so striking, in every case I work on. It just doesn’t seem right."

 

‘Somebody’s got to lose’

Mike Axline

 

Private practice in Sacramento

 

Bio

 

Viewpoint

 

"You’ve got to be willing to lose. That’s why 99 percent of attorneys are not litigators; they settle cases, they try to compromise, they are not willing to get to the point where somebody’s got to win and somebody’s got to lose."

 

‘Sense of urgency’

Jay Tutchton

 

Environmental law clinic at the University of Denver

 

Bio

 

Viewpoint

 

"We have a greater sense of urgency, and need. It’s a true clinic; these (species) don’t have anywhere else to go, and a law student representing them is better than nothing. The government’s behavior is up-front denial of the biodiversity crisis. We have a case where only two plants (of a species) are known to exist, and the government argued that critical habitat designation was not necessary."

 

‘Specialized’

Roger Flynn

 

Western Mining Action Project, in Boulder, Colo.

 

Bio

 

  • Law degree from University of Colorado, 1991, and bachelor’s degree in engineering
  • Founded Western Mining Action Project in 1993
  • Lawsuits and administrative appeals stopped or delayed dozens of mines in the West, including the Oil-Dri kitty litter mine in Nevada and the Crown Jewel gold mine in Washington (that victory got overruled by a congressional rider, but Sen. Slade Gordon took heat for it and was defeated in his re-election attempt)
    Viewpoint
    "To do environmental law, you have to specialize, because you really have to know your issues. When I started, no one was working on mining. The 1872 Mining Law basically ruled everything. They almost didn’t even do environmental reviews of mines. Now they do these big fat environmental impact statements. It takes longer to get a mine going, because they know if they don’t do the review, we’ll sue them. The public is more aware of bad mining, and the agencies are doing a better job."

    ‘Litigation is debatable’

    Tom France
    National Wildlife Federation, Missoula, Mont., branch

    Bio
    Viewpoint
    "Litigation is a useful tool, but sometimes its effectiveness is debatable. National Wildlife Federation in many instances seeks collaborative solutions, finding ways to provide incentives, to work with the affected parties and agencies, to see if we can forge a conservation solution that avoids litigation. We think those solutions can be more durable, and that they are less polarizing."

  • © High Country News