Can cows coexist with rare plant
communities in a national monument? That is what President Clinton
asked the Bureau of Land Management to determine when he created
the 52,947-acre Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument in
2000.
The monument, east of Ashland, Ore., is an
ecological crossroads where three distinct bioregions - the
Siskiyou Mountains, the Cascade Range and the Great Basin -
intersect. The blending of the three regions produces rare plant
communities, such as the Oregon white oak and juniper stands of
Agate Flat and the rosaceous chapparal. At least 23 rare plants
grow here, including Greene's mariposa lily.
At various
times since the late 19th century, these lands have been burned,
scarred, seeded with exotic grasses and heavily overgrazed; even
ranchers admit cows still trample and foul streams and springs. But
there's little hard science on the effects of grazing on the
monument - thus the order from Clinton to take a close
look.
The BLM took the presidential directive seriously;
it developed a detailed study plan that involved establishing
several monitoring sites and hundreds of photo points. The agency
then submitted the plan for peer review and assembled a team to
implement it, at a cost of $1 million, over the next three to five
years.
But three years and $400,000 after the
grazing-impact study began, its funding may be in jeopardy. Asked
to identify potential cuts in his 2004 budget, Medford BLM manager
Tim Reuwsaat zeroed out money for the study. Reuwsaat says that
doesn't mean it won't go forward with other funds. "It's not an
all-or-nothing study, it's more a study process," he says. "We're
not eliminating the grazing study, period. It's a huge district
priority." Dave Willis, chairman of the Soda Mountain Wilderness
Council, is not convinced. "I'm worried the grazing study will
become an unfunded mandate," he says. That would be a disaster,
says Willis, who has lobbied for 20 years to protect this remote
country.
"BLM management is supposed to protect the
monument," Willis says. "Do exotic species like cows help to
sustain natural system dynamics? I don't think
so."
The very idea of the BLM
study has raised the hackles of the ranchers who hold the
nine grazing leases that cover the monument. They successfully
appealed a plan to fence cattle out of several sites, so range
scientists could compare plant growth with and without grazing. "We
involved the lessees in our decision," says Howard Hunter, the
monument's assistant manager. "They didn't like it very
much."
Some ranchers call the grazing study a ploy to kick
cows off the monument, hatched by environmental activists inside
and outside the BLM. Bruce Buckmaster of Ashland, who grazes 100
beef cattle on the Soda Mountain allotment at the monument's south
end, contends it's a conflict of interest for the agency even to
conduct the study.
"It's the fox guarding the henhouse,"
he says. "The BLM is studying itself. A lot of ranchers feel
someone like Oregon State University should be doing the study
instead."
After an account in the Medford Mail Tribune
described cows trampling fragile streams and springs on the
monument, ranchers proposed that the BLM hire a livestock manager
to keep their cattle under control. (That won't happen, Hunter
says; ranchers who lease BLM land are responsible for controlling
their own cows.)
Buckmaster says he tries to minimize the
damage by distributing his cattle across grazing allotments in
small herds. "We do the best we can," he says. "I can't tell you we
keep them out. It's like keeping kids out of the candy store."
The BLM's draft management plan for the monument,
released in 2002, addresses restoration, recreation, road closures,
off-road vehicle use, fire protection, even the potential use of
grazing as a management tool - everything but the option of
removing cows from the monument. The bigger questions will wait for
the grazing study.
Although Clinton's proclamation
requiring the grazing study has the force of law, Willis says, "I
have a lot of confidence that the Bush-Norton BLM will be breathing
heavily down the neck of the Medford BLM. We fully expect that
there will be litigation to hold the Bush administration's feet to
the fire."
On a new national monument, has an agency been cowed?
Document Actions
- Email this
- Write Editor
- Feeds
- Discuss
- Font Size: A A A
del.icio.us
Digg
StumbleUpon

