Although the problem seems overwhelming, returning the forests of the West to productive and resilient ecosystems will be a much easier and less expensive a task than challenges the U.S. has faced in the past, e.g. sending a human to the moon, building the great dams of the West, etc. However, to accomplish this feat, a much more coordinated approach, initiated and led by federal government, will be necessary. I suggest the following broad steps:
• Educate the public so that they understand why the forests are at high risk of catastrophic fires. Try to make them as passionate about forest health as they were about the harp seals.
• Plan fuels-reduction treatments at the landscape level. The prescriptions must be driven solely by ecological considerations and not economics.
• Forget about trying to find a use or market for the small-diameter trees removed from the forest. With timber prices at a 20-year low across the West, commercial thinning will be impossible unless larger trees are removed, thereby defeating the purpose of the fuels-reduction projects. Just burn it or chip it — don’t try to make gold out of dog poop.
• Commit to spending $40 billion over the next 20 years. At $1,000 per acre, an army of forest workers could reduce the fuels on over 2 million acres a year, achieving the goal of 40 million acres in two decades, and costing the taxpayer a mere $10 a year.
Marc D. Barnes
Central Point, Oregon
The author is senior project manager for Consulting Foresters and Restoration Ecologists.
- dan bosch on Suckers for gold
- Tom Darnell on Will public-lands ranchers pay more for grazing?
- Alan Stevens on Private property blocks access to public lands
- Linda VanFossan on California has one year of water left: Hype or reality?
- Joseph Yannuzzi on Sportsmen’s bill aims to open inaccessible public lands