You are here: home   Issues   Pipe Dreams   Bison range fight is not about Indian rights

Bison range fight is not about Indian rights

Document Actions
Your story about the hand-over of three national wildlife refuges to a Montana tribe oversimplified a very complex issue (HCN, 7/7/03: Back on the range?). Despite your portrayal of talks between the Department of the Interior and the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes as a unique attempt to reunite the tribes with bison and lands taken from them decades ago, these secret negotiations are setting dangerous precedents for both the national wildlife refuge system and the national park system. Seventy-five national parks and wildlife refuges — including Redwood, Mount Rainier and Glacier national parks, and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge — are also eligible for similar tribal management plans.

While Undersecretary of the Interior Paul Hoffman has stated that “inherently federal” duties would not be ceded to the tribes, he has also publicly admitted that “inherently federal” is a gray area that will be determined by negotiation. Yet, because the negotiations have been held behind closed doors, without opportunity for public input or oversight, Hoffman and the tribes themselves seek to define those functions as they see fit.

This is not a Native American issue, nor is it a question of whether the tribes could or would successfully operate the National Bison Range and associated refuges. Rather, this is a case of Secretary Gale Norton and her aides taking advantage of political sensitivity to Indian self-determination issues to advance private management of public assets.

Gene Hocutt
Aurora, New York

The writer is director of the Refuge Keeper chapter of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

Email Newsletter

The West in your Inbox

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Follow our RSS feeds!
  1. Rancher vs BLM: a 20-year standoff ends with tense roundup |
  2. Photos of a standoff | Armed militia members join a Nevada rancher to pro...
  3. After the standoff, what's next for Bundy and BLM? |
  4. The energy haves and have-nots | Will rooftop solar owners get off the grid — and...
  5. Why homes are lost to wildfire | This Forest Service expert says it's as much a soc...
  1. Why homes are lost to wildfire | This Forest Service expert says it's as much a soc...
  2. Photos of a standoff | Armed militia members join a Nevada rancher to pro...
  3. The energy haves and have-nots | Will rooftop solar owners get off the grid — and...
  4. Will the Colorado River reach the Gulf of California once more? | Photographs of last month's historic water pulses....
  5. Locals resist a Bakkenization of the Beartooths | South-central Montanans oppose new drilling, forew...
HCN Classifieds
Subscriber Alert
 
© 2014 High Country News, all rights reserved. | privacy policy | terms of use | powered by Plone